Comments Thread For: DeGale: Can't Moan Over Canelo-GGG Draw, It Was Close Fight

[aboutfkntime]

My mention of age was in relation to he's handspeed, I never came on here saying "hey everyone he'd have done better if he'd been quicker" I'm saying hes slower than he was, simple as that. In regards to he's fight with Canelo I and many others thought he won by a couple of rounds. So no excuses needed. Ive not made a single excuse. Age isn't an excuse for defending he's title and winning in the eyes of the world, it's just the age he is, and the reason he's handspeed is slower. Some insiders may have scored for Canelo, but most scored for Golovkin. It doesn't matter like you say, and you have a preconceived position which would have seem Canelo winning any way as long as he left the ring upright. You can't be unbiased, because you call the other guy silly names so your position is hardly based on boxing alone is it? Now here's the pattern you've fell in. I'm answering you and all you are doing is writing that you don't care about anything I write and then talking about every excuse in the book, but this is in reference to me mentioning he's age on the subject of him being slower. It's not an excuse about the fight.i felt he won but Im not bothered about the draw. I don't know where you get "every excuse in the book" from. I think it's another case of you have your mind made up and you've invested in this position and you can't shake out of it. I already stated that Golovkin wining was my opinion, just like him losing he's last two was yours. Corse, I didnt go around calling Jacobs and Canelo silly names so I didn't have a personal stake in what I saw. Fact: Golovkin got a draw, retained he's title and won the fight for me and most others. Fact: No excuses, it's a draw but I thought he won so I don't feel I made some horrendous prediction, unlike those who said Golovkin would be destroyed who you have no issues with.Fact : The reason why you don't have an issue with these predictions is because you have a personal dislike of the fighters and he's fans for some odd reason. FACT : He is 35 and you are slower by then than you were in your 20s,no amount of bollocks from your or pep talk from Sanchez changes that. I've boxed, my friends have boxed and I KNOW this. But do come back with your well established position, even if it's the same thing again because I do enjoy our little convos.

it really is no big deal

it does not greatly matter, nor does it make you a bad person, nor a bad poster, nothing

but, your first comment in bold above..... is another excuse

you suddenly pointing out that Golovkin is 35yo, is pointless..... because you absolutely knew that when you made your original prediction..... nothing has changed, other than Golovkin going life and death with the fat red kid

no big deal, lets agree to disagree

[bluepete]

it really is no big deal

it does not greatly matter, nor does it make you a bad person, nor a bad poster, nothing

but, your first comment in bold above..... is another excuse

you suddenly pointing out that Golovkin is 35yo, is pointless..... because you absolutely knew that when you made your original prediction..... nothing has changed, other than Golovkin going life and death with the fat red kid

no big deal, lets agree to disagree

Well thanks for that I don't think you're so bad yourself. I knew he was abit long in the tooth going in, and you're totally right, I thought hed win no matter the age, thats why I said it. It doesnt change the fact that I think he's slower than when he fought Proska and Co, the fat red kid did alright, I'm not saying it was a robbery or anything. I'm abit biased, I prefer Golovkin over Canelo. I'll say this, even if he's 36 when the rematch comes I think he out works and outjabs Canelo, and I do think he should fight Charlo instead of moving up, it's only fair he gets he's shot as he's the number 1.See,im not one of "those guys". Feel free to pull me up by searching this post out if I suddenly say he should give Charlo a miss and fight Lemieux again.

[aboutfkntime]

Well thanks for that I don't think you're so bad yourself. I knew he was abit long in the tooth going in, and you're totally right, I thought hed win no matter the age, thats why I said it. It doesnt change the fact that I think he's slower than when he fought Proska and Co, the fat red kid did alright, I'm not saying it was a robbery or anything. I'm abit biased, I prefer Golovkin over Canelo. I'll say this, even if he's 36 when the rematch comes I think he out works and outjabs Canelo, and I do think he should fight Charlo instead of moving up, it's only fair he gets he's shot as he's the number 1.See,im not one of "those guys". Feel free to pull me up by searching this post out if I suddenly say he should give Charlo a miss and fight Lemieux again.

fair call