-
-
Actually your latest response confirms your lack of intelligence. You know Curtsy you simply could have said I disagree for "x" reason. I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with my opinion and wants to share their own. But like the moron you are you couldn't do that. You couldn't control your PMS like emotions. That's why I'm absolutely sure you're a total loser in life who's accomplished crap. We both know I'm right.
So basically you admit you attacked me with your groupie talk not because of what I stated in my post but because of what others wrote. You lack the both the mental and emotional intelligence to not resort to stereotypes when engaging in individual encounters, yes that pretty much confirms for me you aren't very bright.
I'm not sure why I should even respond as you clearly have me all figured out. You've already lumped me in with a group of people. Your other buttbrother WeedQueen did the same thing. Claims I've said certain things which I haven't. I ask him to please find me the quote and it is crickets from him. I challenge you to do the same thing, find me the quote where I've said or indicated that Golovkin is not at fault for anything, though I'm not sure what that exactly means. He's a boxer and an athlete and just like every other athlete in any sport he isn't perfect. The greatest players in any sport aren't free from valid criticisms. That doesn't mean they still aren't great.
Curtsy you're hung up on Golovkin fans and the reality is you are as big a loser as any Golovkin fan who you might think is a nuthugger. Your attack on me in a post where I stated nothing negative or positive about any particular fighter is proof.
Now that I've dispatched of you and your idiocy I'm going to go enjoy the rest of this sports Saturday. Meanwhile you can get back to your obsession with Golovkin groupies and trying to determine why you get a chubby when ever Golovkin's name comes up.Comment
-
If he had fought Saunders it would have made total sense. Chance to capture all belts and bigger money fight.
He doesn't have anything to prove against Charlo at this point. The word duck against Charlo shouldn't even be mentioned at this point. Charlo has had one fight against a nobody.
As I said a few months ago now, Charlo should be continuing to fight other name fighters. He shouldn't be sitting around waiting for a Golovkin fight that may not happen any time soon. I said it might not happen until 2019 and if Golovkin doesn't fight Canelo until May 2018 he may only have one fight left in 2018. Who knows maybe there is a third Canelo fight, maybe Jacobs rematch or still Saunders out there. Or he moves up. Charlo can't be sitting on his ass waiting for things to fall his way.Comment
-
I’m sure Mr. “I’m not afraid of nobody. They already gave out fear when I was born. I know I won the fight 8-4. I’m the new face of boxing. This is my era” knows very well that the second time around judges and referees will not be taking money from fishnet Oscar to make canellow the winner. He will have to win by KO, but GGG walked through his best shots unfazed. I will not be surprised that canellow fights Lemiuex when he takes the title away from BJS. Less risk and can force the rematch to 2019.Comment
-
We will agree to disaagree. we need more fights by the superstars.Comment
-
We will agree to disaagree. we need more fights by the superstars. Plenty of fighter dont mean ****...just like sport teams we gravitate towards certain fighter so would be nice to have the superstars fight more often.Comment
Tweet
The only thing sh*****g on the sport is the media & fans that "Don't Know S**t Bout Boxing."
Comment