Comments Thread For: A New Number One: BoxingScene Pound-for-Pound Update

[iamboxing]

Loma then Crawford

[j.razor]

Talk about not knowing boxing. Cliff Rold, You wack.

I like Crawford but Thurman has a better resume, is Champion & undefeated so how is Bud over Keith? Is it cuz he is a Top Rank fighter? How is loma in the list with 10 fights, only 2 good opponents he fought & has a loss, is it cuz he a TR Fighter? lil g has two losses in a row & has a weak resume berore those two losses so how is he in the list period? Nelo has a better resume than all the fighters on this list & only lost to T.B.E. so how is he not high on the list?

This is how people that "Don't Know S**t Bout Boxing" get confused......believing these kind of P4P Lists.....espn sux too....

[M Bison]

Number 1 should be GGG no doubt about it, I wouldn't complain with Rungvisai taking 1# though because he prove it back to back beating the 1# rated P4P guy unlike Crawford who has fought nobody good at all and has yet to prove himself as an elite fighter so far he is simply a good fighter in a weak division nobody can deny this.

[BigStomps]

Which pound for pound fighter did he dethrone,? just curious

I see it like this. In his last 7-8 fights he defeated three undefeated Fighters in Gamboa, Postol, and his last fight against that fighter from Africa. The one he unified all the titles with. I forgot his name.
The point is Crawford has speed, power, footwork, he can fight either southpaw or conventional, and he's very intelligent. He can do it all.
Even though he hasn't fought at welterweight he's already top three in that division with Thurman and Spence being the other two.
And if they fought you really can't say Crawford is the underdog cause like I said, he can do it all.
Some people might disagree but that's my opinion.
Who do you have P4P #1?

[Jsmooth9876]

Talk about not knowing boxing. Cliff Rold, You wack.

I like Crawford but Thurman has a better resume, is Champion & undefeated so how is Bud over Keith? Is it cuz he is a Top Rank fighter? How is loma in the list with 10 fights, only 2 good opponents he fought & has a loss, is it cuz he a TR Fighter? lil g has two losses in a row & has a weak resume berore those two losses so how is he in the list period? Nelo has a better resume than all the fighters on this list & only lost to T.B.E. so how is h not high on the list?

This is how people that "Don't Know S**t Bout Boxing" get confused......believing these kind of P4P Lists.....espn sux too....

Well, what can I say other than LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

the Irony in your last paragraph is amazing.
And who the fk gives you Green K? Have never seen you post anything close to sensible or non biased. Oh well, that's the Internet for ya

[j.razor]

I'm more curious as to how industry will write about RIGO in December when the unsung hero wins in glorious fashion.

If Rigo wins he would only get put up one spot higher & they would only bring loma down one....

[kavi521]

I do not mind the list just a few thing, Garcia is too high but understand it and respect that but Leo in at 10 is a no....

[M Bison]

I see it like this. In his last 7-8 fights he defeated three undefeated Fighters in Gamboa, Postol, and his last fight against that fighter from Africa. The one he unified all the titles with. I forgot his name.
The point is Crawford has speed, power, footwork, he can fight either southpaw or conventional, and he's very intelligent. He can do it all.
Even though he hasn't fought at welterweight he's already top three in that division with Thurman and Spence being the other two.
And if they fought you really can't say Crawford is the underdog cause like I said, he can do it all.
Some people might disagree but that's my opinion.
Who do you have P4P #1?

Gamboa talented but incredibly small
GGG win over Kell Brook tops that

The Africa Ndingdong doe awful technique and with no good wins on his record

Postol is the only half decent one he has and that's it, half decent nothing more nothing less and in that fight Crawford fought negative as hell and put on an absolute sleeper of a performance which was nothing to sing home about.

Crawford is also fighting in the weakest division currently in boxing right now another reason why Crawford shouldn't be 1#, but yeah we get the agenda Americans just want another black boy to be your #1 to stroke your fragile weak ass little ego lmfao.

[Drew Bundini Br]

CRAWFORD without question!

[Gillie]

I see it like this. In his last 7-8 fights he defeated three undefeated Fighters in Gamboa, Postol, and his last fight against that fighter from Africa. The one he unified all the titles with. I forgot his name.
The point is Crawford has speed, power, footwork, he can fight either southpaw or conventional, and he's very intelligent. He can do it all.
Even though he hasn't fought at welterweight he's already top three in that division with Thurman and Spence being the other two.
And if they fought you really can't say Crawford is the underdog cause like I said, he can do it all.
Some people might disagree but that's my opinion.
Who do you have P4P #1?

Good post. Crawford is the complete package and has defeated 3 undefeated champions. I have him as number one as well. I find that Thurman doesn't seem to get as much respect as he should. He should be in the top 5 with his wins over Porter and Garcia imo. Peace.