Stop with the sci fi nonsense. Plenty of HW champions haven't been seen as the "baddest man on the planet" by anyone. Hell I don't think most saw Wladimir Klitschko as the baddest man on the planet & he had a highly impressive reign. Baddest man on the planet has been a title pushed onto select few HW title holders in history. Its mythical. Its bullsh^t. It is catchy doe & thats why some minority of fans, like yourself apparently, see it as a real thing.
Thats still a horrible analogy cuz those are skill level differences not height or weight or anything physical related (well expect for the handicap league). The reality is any sport with so much contact weight is playing a part in deciding the winner. Thats the whole reason we have weight divisions in the first place.
LOL no its not. People haven't even been paying attention to "the champion of boxing" til recently. The whole Klitschko "baddest man on the planet era" wasn't even a thing to most people.
Is HW the most influential division to casuals when its interesting? Sure. But personality & how guys win plays into it to. Mike Tyson was that mythical baddest man on the planet. Joshua & Wilder aren't...yet at least. Klitschko definitely wasn't. Michael Moorer wasn't. Buster Douglas wasn't. Sonny Liston & Muhammad Ali probably were but that was before my time. Others were, most weren't. Its much more selective of a thing & involved capturing the publics imagination more than winning a belt.
You can still have divisions. Just as basketball has college, high school, the WNBA, wheelchair leagues, etc.
But the heavyweight champion is the champion of boxing.
Is HW the most influential division to casuals when its interesting? Sure. But personality & how guys win plays into it to. Mike Tyson was that mythical baddest man on the planet. Joshua & Wilder aren't...yet at least. Klitschko definitely wasn't. Michael Moorer wasn't. Buster Douglas wasn't. Sonny Liston & Muhammad Ali probably were but that was before my time. Others were, most weren't. Its much more selective of a thing & involved capturing the publics imagination more than winning a belt.
Comment