Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[ironmt]

Ship-out, do you realize we are nearing 850 posts and you still don't know what a WADA signatory is?

And you still don't know that as a WADA signatory, anything that involves USADA by definition also involves WADA?

And how many times do you have to be told that everything gets reported to both WADA and USADA?

BTW, where is your essay proving Floyd cheated?

I think you are crazier than a bedbug but if you think USADA did something wrong then, on the million to one chance you are actually right, they should not get away with it.

So let's petition WADA and the press to investigate.

I may be wrong here, but didn't you say a few pages back (or more at this point) that you believed Floyd looked su****ious or that the whole process looked suspect?

If so, how did you now come to the conclusion that It Is a "million to one chance"

[koolkc107]

I may be wrong here, but didn't you say a few pages back (or more at this point) that you believed Floyd looked su****ious or that the whole process looked suspect?

If so, how did you now come to the conclusion that It Is a "million to one chance"

I said it looked shady not that is was shady.

Any even cursory application of common sense and you realize that he did not cheat.

Actually, he couldn't cheat, not the way things went down.

As travestyny has said, if he really was going to cheat and if he really bought off USADA, none of us would know an IV was even used.

That, and a sample tested before the IV was given came back clean and matched everything else.

That should be enough for any sane person, no matter how it looked.

Couple that with it being Nevada, where IVs are almost commonplace, and you have a lot of smoke but no fire.

[Shape up]

Ship-out, do you realize we are nearing 850 posts and you still don't know what a WADA signatory is?

And you still don't know that as a WADA signatory, anything that involves USADA by definition also involves WADA?

And how many times do you have to be told that everything gets reported to both WADA and USADA?

BTW, where is your essay proving Floyd cheated?

I think you are crazier than a bedbug but if you think USADA did something wrong then, on the million to one chance you are actually right, they should not get away with it.

So let's petition WADA and the press to investigate.

What you fail to realize is when you crackheads **** on about garbage I basically ignore it, you 2 ****** on about labs for 3 pages, why would I need to explain myself about a topic I didn't even touch on. I let you imbeciles ramble on and embarrass yourselves, you clowns are the ones who could argue that it's cold in Antarctica, you 2 reply can't be that dumb to believe fluid is clean after the IV incident

[Shape up]

Yes I did you moron. LMAOOOOOO.


I see you haven't visited USADA's website and posted section 5 of the USADA Protocol, huh?


Why won't you do it?

Oh, and do you still believe its an international level fight? Haven't heard you say that in awhile

Embarrassed yet?

No you didn't answer it, yes I posted the full section that was written in the contract, the only relevant part. It is international, a world title isn't a national title gimp, now 23.2.2 , what have you to say

[Bobby Deez]

Ha ha like domino's, cuz.

[travestyny]

No you didn't answer it, yes I posted the full section that was written in the contract, the only relevant part. It is international, a world title isn't a national title gimp, now 23.2.2 , what have you to say

Then why don’t you step up, son.

First we can have a little contest about if this was an international level competition as defined by WADA. Don’t worry about perma ban. We’ll do it for sig control.

Are you down. Yes or no? Stop ducking.

And no you cvnt. I never said this was a national level event either. Lmaoooo. Try to read and comprehend.

Oh, and I’m still waiting for you to post section 5 from the USADA protocol. Funny that it includes everything that you said was missing, isn’t it?

Why won’t you step up and put your account where your mouth is. Not too confident, are you?

[ironmt]

I said it looked shady not that is was shady.

Any even cursory application of common sense and you realize that he did not cheat.

Actually, he couldn't cheat, not the way things went down.

As travestny has said, if he really was going to cheat and if he really bought off USADA, none of us would know an IV was even used.

That, and a sample tested before the IV was given came back clean and matched everything else.

That should be enough for any sane person, no matter how it looked.

Couple that with it being Nevada, where IVs are almost commonplace, and you have a lot of smoke but no fire.

I will say this.

I am as interested in the truth as anyone.

Which is why I will fully support anyone who comes up with a clear logical essay on how and why Floyd cheated.

I will help get the essay to media sources and help petition WADA with it.

If they are really sure about it, I will help even tho I think they are batshyt crazy.

The sport should be clean, no matter who it is.

It Is an Interesting debate and I agree with keeping the sport clean regardless of who It Is. In reality, that's never going to happen.

There have been valid points made on both sides, honestly, Including the following comment you quoted.

As travestny has said, if he really was going to cheat and if he really bought off USADA, none of us would know an IV was even used.

You also have to understand why people feel that the entire process looks su****ious, which you did when you said It looked shady.

It Is very su****ious to have a cash cow fighter such as Floyd have a tight relationship with one drug testing agency and absolutely flat out refuse to use any other agency. Let's face It, Floyd has contributed handsomely to USADA.

At the end of the day we will probably never really know what exactly transpired.

If Floyd does return he should rematch Pacquiao and put this entire debate to rest. At this point In their careers Floyd would be a massive favorite and should win on points fairly easy, although, at one point(2009) I don't think that would have been the case.

[travestyny]

It Is an Interesting debate and I agree with keeping the sport clean regardless of who It Is. In reality, that's never going to happen.

There have been valid points made on both sides, honestly, Including the following comment you quoted.

As travestny has said, if he really was going to cheat and if he really bought off USADA, none of us would know an IV was even used.

You also have to understand why people feel that the entire process looks su****ious, which you did when you said It looked shady.

It Is very su****ious to have a cash cow fighter such as Floyd have a tight relationship with one drug testing agency and absolutely flat out refuse to use any other agency. Let's face It, Floyd has contributed handsomely to USADA.

At the end of the day we will probably never really know what exactly transpired.

If Floyd does return he should rematch Pacquiao and put this entire debate to rest. At this point In their careers Floyd would be a massive favorite and should win on points fairly easy, although, at one point(2009) I don't think that would have been the case.

Good post.

I just wanted to add that it makes sense for Floyd to stay with USADA. They do the ABP which makes it more difficult to cheat. So the more tests he takes that are overseen by USADA, the better.

[Shape up]

Then why don’t you step up, son.

First we can have a little contest about if this was an international level competition as defined by WADA. Don’t worry about perma ban. We’ll do it for sig control.

Are you down. Yes or no? Stop ducking.

And no you cvnt. I never said this was a national level event either. Lmaoooo. Try to read and comprehend.

Oh, and I’m still waiting for you to post section 5 from the USADA protocol. Funny that it includes everything that you said was missing, isn’t it?

Why won’t you step up and put your account where your mouth is. Not too confident, are you?

Well if you didn't say anything about national level athletes, why did you post a WADA rule that refers to national level athletes, where was the point in doing that

[Shape up]

wada definition of international level athlete:athletes who compete in sport at the international level, as definedby each intternational federation, consistent with the international standard for testing and investigations