Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[Shape up]

There is absolutely nothing I can do to improve upon the thorough asskicking that travestny has given you over and over again on this point so I will let what he has said stand in as rebuttal.

Here are the questions you still can't answer.

WHY HASN'T WADA COME AFTER USADA AND SUSPENDED THEM THE SAME WAY THEY DID RUSADA FOR DOING EXACTLY THE SAME THINGS WITH RUSSIAN ATHLETES YOU CLAIM USADA DID WITH FLOYD?

WHAT TOOK HAUSER 4 MONTHS TO ACCUSE FLOYD?

WE KNOW PAC LIKES TO SUE SO WHY DIDN'T HE HERE?

WHAT TOOK ARUM AND PAC 4 MONTHS TO COMMENT?

WHY DIDN'T THEY ASK NSAC TO THROW OUT FIGHT RESULTS?

This is what I started the thread with.

Read the OP if you have forgotten.

And almost 800 posts later, none of you butthurts have answered it yet with anything better than deflection and cretinism.

Try to do better.

It's no ones fault except yours if you don't understand contracts and wording, it's quite funny how you and your alt try and change the subject when a hard question is asked. You 2 clowns ****** on for 3 pages about labs when I hadn't even stated anything about them, now your trying to distance yourself from the statement asked for 23.2.2, why don't you answer the question instead of ****ing on about nothing, you can talk all you want about kicking arse, ra ra ra, that **** doesn't answer questions, stop diverting and answer

[koolkc107]

It's no ones fault except yours if you don't understand contracts and wording, it's quite funny how you and your alt try and change the subject when a hard question is asked. You 2 clowns ****** on for 3 pages about labs when I hadn't even stated anything about them, now your trying to distance yourself from the statement asked for 23.2.2, why don't you answer the question instead of ****ing on about nothing, you can talk all you want about kicking arse, ra ra ra, that **** doesn't answer questions, stop diverting and answer

Again, this has been addressed and stomped on so many times, I won't bother.

The issue isn't any slight changes to the contract that were made to accomodate Pacquiao.

The issue here is that you are maintaining Floyd bought USADA, that USADA is corrupt.

Which is why I need your clear detailed answers to the following questions.

Don't just say one word "contract" that doesn't even apply to what is being asked.

I am asking you about WADA, the oversite authority

Here again are the questions you cannot answer:

Try to answer them this time.

WHY HASN'T WADA COME AFTER USADA AND SUSPENDED THEM THE SAME WAY THEY DID RUSADA FOR DOING EXACTLY THE SAME THINGS WITH RUSSIAN ATHLETES YOU CLAIM USADA DID WITH FLOYD?

WHAT TOOK HAUSER 4 MONTHS TO ACCUSE FLOYD?

WE KNOW PAC LIKES TO SUE SO WHY DIDN'T HE HERE?

WHAT TOOK ARUM AND PAC 4 MONTHS TO COMMENT?

WHY DIDN'T THEY ASK NSAC TO THROW OUT FIGHT RESULTS?

You can either answer them with facts of your own, since you are alleging USADA is corrupt or you can admit you are full of shyt, which is the truth.

[Shape up]

Again you won't answer the question, it's clear you cannot answer, diversion again, you haven't STOMPED anything as you stated, bravado does PROVE anything, usada shredded the wada code in half for this fight to suit fluid IVayweathers agenda to cheat

[travestyny]

wouldnt implementation of the code be considered important in boxing tooli, seeing they "left it out"

now your trying to distance yourself from the statement asked for 23.2.2, why don't you answer the question instead of ****ing on about nothing, you can talk all you want about kicking arse, ra ra ra, that **** doesn't answer questions, stop diverting and answer

23.2 Implementation of the Code
23.2.1 The Signatories shall implement applicable Code provisions through policies, statutes, rules or regulations according to their authority and within their relevant spheres of responsibility.
23.2.2 The following Articles as applicable to the scope of the anti-doping activity which the anti-doping organization performs must be implemented by Signatories without substantive change (allowing for any non-substantive changes to the language in order to refer to the organization’s name, sport, section numbers, etc.):
• Article 1 (De nition of Doping)
• Article 2 (Anti-Doping Rule Violations)
• Article 3 (Proof of Doping)
• Article 4.2.2 (Speci ed Substances)
• Article 4.3.3 (Wada’s Determination of the Prohibited list)
• Article 7.11 (Retirement from Sport)
• Article 9 (Automatic disquali cation of individual Results)
• Article 10 (Sanctions on Individuals)
• Article 11 (Consequences to Teams)
• Article 13 (Appeals) with the exception of 13.2.2, 13.6, and 13.7
• Article 15.1 (Recognition of Decisions)
• Article 17 (Statute of Limitations)
• Article 24 (Interpretation of the Code)
• Appendix 1 - Definitions-----------------------

So how did they have substantive change to all of these articles above article 10, when clearly it's stated by the code that usada cannot Change it under the rules

Dude. I've answered this question a billion times. You just refuse to accept what's right in front of your eyes. There is so much I can type here, but I'm going to make this nice and simple so that you can understand.

From the contract:

Mayweather and Pacquiao agree that sections 5, 9-13, 16, 17(a), and 21 of the United States Anti-Doping Agency
Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing shall constitute the procedural rules applicable to any Results Management Services provided hereunder.

Let's look at Section 5:

5. Choice of Rules
In conducting Testing and results management under this Protocol, USADA will apply the following rules and principles:
a. Articles of the Code set forth in Annex A, which is incorporated by reference into the USADA Protocol, shall apply in all cases.

Ok great. WADA Codes set forth in Annex A should apply IN ALL CASES.

Do you know what is included in Annex A?

• Article 1 (De nition of Doping)
• Article 2 (Anti-Doping Rule Violations)
• Article 3 (Proof of Doping)
• Article 4.2.2 (Speci ed Substances)
• Article 4.3.3 (Wada’s Determination of the Prohibited list)
• Article 7.11 (Retirement from Sport)
• Article 9 (Automatic disquali cation of individual Results)
• Article 10 (Sanctions on Individuals)
• Article 11 (Consequences to Teams)
• Article 13 (Appeals) with the exception of 13.2.2, 13.6, and 13.7
• Article 15.1 (Recognition of Decisions)
• Article 17 (Statute of Limitations)
• Article 24 (Interpretation of the Code)
• Appendix 1 - Definitions

Go see for yourself

https://www.usada.org/wp-content/upl...A_protocol.pdf


IT'S OVER! GIVE UP!!! I'M TIRED OF TEACHING YOU, SON!

R.I.P.

[koolkc107]

He keeps asking the same ******-assed question as if you never answered it the first time.

And it's a question that only tangentially has anything to do with the OP.

But, ask him a question that even gives him the benefit of the doubt, one that starts off assuming his ******ed ass is actually correct, and he still can't answer it.

This fool and others like him have spent almost a thousand posts saying Floyd cheated and USADA is corrupt.

But ask them why WADA hasn't dropped the hammer on USADA and they look like a toddler that just shat himself.

It's amazing really.

Still looking for answers to these.

Any butthurt Pac fan can try...


WHY HASN'T WADA COME AFTER USADA AND SUSPENDED THEM THE SAME WAY THEY DID RUSADA FOR DOING EXACTLY THE SAME THINGS WITH RUSSIAN ATHLETES YOU CLAIM USADA DID WITH FLOYD?

WHAT TOOK HAUSER 4 MONTHS TO ACCUSE FLOYD?

WE KNOW PAC LIKES TO SUE SO WHY DIDN'T HE HERE?

WHAT TOOK ARUM AND PAC 4 MONTHS TO COMMENT?

WHY DIDN'T THEY ASK NSAC TO THROW OUT FIGHT RESULTS?

[Shape up]

Dude. I've answered this question a billion times. You just refuse to accept what's right in front of your eyes. There is so much I can type here, but I'm going to make this nice and simple so that you can understand.

From the contract:



Let's look at Section 5:


Ok great. WADA Codes set forth in Annex A should apply IN ALL CASES.

Do you know what is included in Annex A?

• Article 1 (De nition of Doping)
• Article 2 (Anti-Doping Rule Violations)
• Article 3 (Proof of Doping)
• Article 4.2.2 (Speci ed Substances)
• Article 4.3.3 (Wada’s Determination of the Prohibited list)
• Article 7.11 (Retirement from Sport)
• Article 9 (Automatic disquali cation of individual Results)
• Article 10 (Sanctions on Individuals)
• Article 11 (Consequences to Teams)
• Article 13 (Appeals) with the exception of 13.2.2, 13.6, and 13.7
• Article 15.1 (Recognition of Decisions)
• Article 17 (Statute of Limitations)
• Article 24 (Interpretation of the Code)
• Appendix 1 - Definitions

Go see for yourself

https://www.usada.org/wp-content/upl...A_protocol.pdf


IT'S OVER! GIVE UP!!! I'M TIRED OF TEACHING YOU, SON!

R.I.P.

Why do you keep posting parts of the protocol, in this instance, for this fight, via the contract, the protocol isn't worth the paper it's written on, so have you given up on up on trying to pass this WORLD TITLE FIGHT off as national level you ****** pr1ck, how about 23.2.2 for implementation of the code, how about the fact you can't give a retro TUE to combat dehydration, how about the fact an IV is prohibited at all times for recuperation not in an appropriate medical setting and a proposal from wada RECOMMENDING something doesn't make it a rule, none of the above has been answered by you 2 clowns, I have shown you clowns answer after answer, you 2 are dumb and dumber

[Shape up]

Originally Posted by Shape up View Post
the code 23.2.2the following articles as applicable to the scope of the anti doping activity which the anti doping organization performs must be implemented by signatories without substantive change--------------so you haven't answered this one, in fact you've avoided it

[Shape up]

omit
ə(ʊ)ˈmɪt/Submit
verb
past tense: omitted; past participle: omitted
leave out or exclude (someone or something), either intentionally or forgetfully.
"he was omitted from the second Test"-------- thought I'd set you straight that omitted means left out

[travestyny]

Why do you keep posting parts of the protocol, in this instance, for this fight, via the contract, the protocol isn't worth the paper it's written on, so have you given up on up on trying to pass this WORLD TITLE FIGHT off as national level you ****** pr1ck, how about 23.2.2 for implementation of the code, how about the fact you can't give a retro TUE to combat dehydration, how about the fact an IV is prohibited at all times for recuperation not in an appropriate medical setting and a proposal from wada RECOMMENDING something doesn't make it a rule, none of the above has been answered by you 2 clowns, I have shown you clowns answer after answer, you 2 are dumb and dumber

Originally Posted by Shape up View Post
the code 23.2.2the following articles as applicable to the scope of the anti doping activity which the anti doping organization performs must be implemented by signatories without substantive change--------------so you haven't answered this one, in fact you've avoided it

Listen, you ******ed monkey. THE ****ING CONTRACT SAYS WHERE THE RULES COME FROM. Why am I posting the protocol??? BECAUSE THE ****ING CONTRACT SAYS THE PROTOCOL IS WHAT IS USED, YOU DUMB BlTCH!

Mayweather and Pacquiao agree that sections 5, 9-13, 16, 17(a), and 21 of the United States Anti-Doping Agency
Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing shall constitute the procedural rules applicable to any Results Management Services provided hereunder.

Isn't that what is says above, you ****ing idiot. YOU'RE JUST MAD BECAUSE ALL OF THE SHlT THAT YOU'VE BEEN RANTING ABOUT IS RIGHT THERE!!!

And for the last time, you waste of bone marrow, this is NOT an international level competition.



Here is more from the Code, Moron!:

Athlete: Any Person who competes in sport at the international level (as defined by each international Federation) or the national level (as defined by each national anti-doping organization).

An anti-doping organization has discretion to apply anti-doping rules to an athlete who is neither an International-level athlete nor a national-level athlete, and thus to bring them within the definition of “Athlete.”

In relation to athletes who are neither International-level nor national-level athletes, an anti-doping organization may elect to: conduct limited testing or no testing at all; analyze Samples for less than the full menu of Prohibited Substances; require limited or no whereabouts information; or not require advance tues.
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...oping-code.pdf

Does that make it clearer, you dumb ****?

How the **** are you trying to say that Mayweather is an international level athlete. What international level federation governs over him? THERE IS ONLY ONE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR BOXING:

Boxing (AIBA) - International Boxing Association

THAT IS A SIGNATORY FOR WADA. See for yourself here:

https://www.wada-ama.org/en/code-signatories


BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, IT'S FOR AMATEURS, YOU MORON!

The International Boxing Association, originally the Association Internationale de Boxe Amateur and still referred to as the AIBA is a sport organization that sanctions amateur (Olympic-style) boxing matches and awards world and subordinate championships.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intern...ation_(amateur)

NOW SHUT THE **** UP AND GO BACK TO SCHOOL. I'M TIRED OF BEATING THE SHlT OUT OF YOU!

[travestyny]

omit
ə(ʊ)ˈmɪt/Submit
verb
past tense: omitted; past participle: omitted
leave out or exclude (someone or something), either intentionally or forgetfully.
"he was omitted from the second Test"-------- thought I'd set you straight that omitted means left out

GO READ MY PREVIOUS POST CAREFULLY, YOU ****ING IDIOT. FOR YOUR SAKE, I HOPE YOU'RE A TROLL. IF NOT, YOU'RE ONE OF THE DUMBEST PEOPLE I'VE EVER ENCOUNTERED. LOG THE **** OFF!

OH....AND WHILE UR AT IT, TELL ME WHY SECTION#5 OF THE USADA PROTOCOL, WHICH IS SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED IN THE CONTRACT, HAS ALL THE SHlT THAT YOU CLAIM WAS OMITTED. LMAOOOOOO!!!!


**** OFF, BlTCH!