Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
    Regular TUEs do need prior approval.

    Retroactive TUEs are approved after the fact as long as they fit certain criteria set forth by WADA.

    My source?

    Turn to page 10 of this WADA protocol:

    https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...E-Final-EN.pdf


    4.3 An Athlete may only be granted retroactive approval for his/her The****utic Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (i.e., a retroactive TUE) if:

    a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary; or

    b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or

    c. The applicable rules required the Athlete (see comment to Article 5.1) or permitted the Athlete (see Code Article 4.4.5) to apply for a retroactive TUE; or

    [Comment to 4.3(c): Such Athletes are strongly advised to have a medical file prepared and ready to demonstrate their satisfaction of the TUE conditions set out at Article 4.1, in case an application for a retroactive TUE is necessary following Sample collection.]

    d. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.

    [Comment to 4.3(d): If WADA and/or the Anti-Doping Organization do not agree to the application of Article 4.3(d), that may not be challenged either as a defense to proceedings for an anti-doping rule violation, or by way of appeal, or otherwise.]


    In a previous post, I established that what Floyd did was legal and in compliance.

    Here is the source for that:

    https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau..._july_2016.pdf

    Notice in Table 2 of the appendix (pg 7), the circumstances of what happened in Floyd's case are covered and the box in the lower left of the table states he needs a TUE for what happened.

    Which is what he got retroactively as part of WADA's normal protocol.

    Now, you butthurt folks can continue to go to the WADA protocol and editing out things or leaving out parts of it, but every time you do, I or someone else will site those botched quotes and point folks to the full quote, explaining exactly why Mayweather was compliant and further exposing you as so hellbent on finding excuses for your hero getting his ass beat that you are willing to fabricate things to appear as fact when they are in truth more lies.

    Stop it.

    You are embarrassing yourselves.
    When did this happen? The only fighter that was wobbled In the fight was Floyd. Neither fighter beat the other fighter's ass and If you truly feel that way than you need to watch more boxing.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
      Oh I get it? You are begging for attention just like you begged me to wear pink clothing with you???

      Lmaooooo. Go away, f@g. This convo is for men.
      lololololol

      No I'm just exposing you for being the biggest ****** in here hahaha!!

      3rd duck in the books. I haven't even started lol

      Travestyny, I haven't even asked you the question, thus you have no idea what it is, and you are already sweating like a little gurrl.

      #duckcity


      #thenerveforyoutocallanothermanaducker SMDH


      Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post

      Hey guys, I can make Travestyny duck a question like his life depended on it. Watch.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
        Lmaoooo. Look how we got these pacroaches going crazy.

        Keep going, ******s
        Their devotion to somehow smearing the innocent name of the guy who made a whole nation cry by kicking their hero's ass would be touching if it wasn't also borderline psychotic.

        They are bringing up cycling, a completely different sport.

        They cite outdated methods that would never get past today's testing.

        They have been shown that some of what they thought was doping was a chimera.

        They are told in plain english that every authority involved has exonerated Floyd completely... and still they try.

        But, the one thing they can't explain is why WADA hasn't slammed USADA and Floyd the way they slammed RUSADA and a whole slew of Russian boxers.

        WADA has no problem suspending signatory organizations and decertifying labs if they find impropriety.

        http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-11-1...liance/6953822

        You can be sure if there was something to find with Floyd or USADA, the folks at WADA would have found it by now.

        Comment


        • Chug it in Floyd. Chug it in.

          Look at that so dehydrated. He can nod his head to the beat of music, he can smile and look healthy even though he was supposed to be limp. Amazing athlete indeed. He can easily be dehydrated in a few hours after re-hydrating orally. Amazing!


          #IVSNEEDED

          Comment


          • Here's a question for you Pac fan's.

            The info that Floyd got a retroactive TUE was public by May 22, 2015.

            Pac and Arum had been notified May 19th.

            So, how come it took 4 months for anyone to start calling Floyd a cheat?

            https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/boxin...182400390.html

            Comment


            • Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
              Here's a question for you Pac fan's.

              The info that Floyd got a retroactive TUE was public by May 22, 2015.

              Pac and Arum had been notified May 19th.

              So, how come it took 4 months for anyone to start calling Floyd a cheat?

              https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/boxin...182400390.html
              Again more rubbish, there is a clear rule in place, arum and pacquaio were subject to a confidentiality clause, which means they were not allowed to raise the subject of the TUE, it's funny to see you weasels squirm and try and pass what you assume a rule means as a fact, fact was there was no sign of dehydration, fact we only have usada and floyds word that this is how it happened, fact usada has been shady in the past with morales, fact for the good of the athlete the NSAC should have been notified, fact fluid saw a doctor 2 hours before an IV was performed in his lounge room, fact he was not sent to hospital, fact floyd said it was just rehydration, fact, usada should be sanctioned for a TUE for mild dehydration, fact a retro tue can only be issued for an IV to combat dehydration if WADA monitors it

              Comment


              • we now know why floyd refused to sign a contract stipulating if either fighter failed a drug test, they would be fined 5 million dollars, why wouldn't he sign it,

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                  lololololol

                  No I'm just exposing you for being the biggest ****** in here hahaha!!

                  3rd duck in the books. I haven't even started lol

                  Travestyny, I haven't even asked you the question, thus you have no idea what it is, and you are already sweating like a little gurrl.

                  #duckcity


                  #thenerveforyoutocallanothermanaducker SMDH
                  Lmaooo. Look how ******ed you are.

                  How the **** can I duck a question that isn’t asked? That’s like saying you ducked a punch that wasn’t thrown!!!

                  Lmaooo. Go learn something kid. Stop embarrassing yourself!!!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
                    Their devotion to somehow smearing the innocent name of the guy who made a whole nation cry by kicking their hero's ass would be touching if it wasn't also borderline psychotic.

                    They are bringing up cycling, a completely different sport.

                    They cite outdated methods that would never get past today's testing.

                    They have been shown that some of what they thought was doping was a chimera.

                    They are told in plain english that every authority involved has exonerated Floyd completely... and still they try.

                    But, the one thing they can't explain is why WADA hasn't slammed USADA and Floyd the way they slammed RUSADA and a whole slew of Russian boxers.

                    WADA has no problem suspending signatory organizations and decertifying labs if they find impropriety.

                    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-11-1...liance/6953822

                    You can be sure if there was something to find with Floyd or USADA, the folks at WADA would have found it by now.
                    You hit the nail on the head. It really does border on some degree of psychosis!! How ****ing sad is that???

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                      Again more rubbish, there is a clear rule in place, arum and pacquaio were subject to a confidentiality clause, which means they were not allowed to raise the subject of the TUE, it's funny to see you weasels squirm and try and pass what you assume a rule means as a fact, fact was there was no sign of dehydration, fact we only have usada and floyds word that this is how it happened, fact usada has been shady in the past with morales, fact for the good of the athlete the NSAC should have been notified, fact fluid saw a doctor 2 hours before an IV was performed in his lounge room, fact he was not sent to hospital, fact floyd said it was just rehydration, fact, usada should be sanctioned for a TUE for mild dehydration, fact a retro tue can only be issued for an IV to combat dehydration if WADA monitors it
                      Lmao. You wouldn’t know a fact if it smacked you in the face. Keep crying. Aren’t you choking on those tears yet?

                      Get your head out of Hauser’s ass. Once he was proven wrong, you should have stopped watching boxing like most of the other PAC Roaches. You were just too ****** to go away

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP