Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[travestyny]

NO you are not getting it ... DEFLECTOR CITY!!!




1. Going by past fights, how many times was Floyd tested at the weigh-in?


2. I keep on asking you, what are you talking about with Mosley?


You would take a bullet for your hero!
Floyd gave 3 simples BS excuses. Did he say he had the runs?


Still, even though you DEFLECTED, logically, if you have the runs and become extremely dehydrated, you tend to lose weight not come in as you usually do for a freaking decade! Ooops!




3. Novitsky contradicts himself while trying to protect USADA!!!

Novistky says that besides the TUEC there is going to be a thorough vetting process.

Now comes Floyd's case ...... CRICKETS!!!! No vetting process. As I stated, there was a TON of stuff to investigate!!!!



THRESHOLDS!!!
You went back to a case from 2003/2004 and tried to convince people that there were no thresholds. The case wasn't even about WADA. Judge 3 believed you even though you know that the case had loads of statements where both side said ..... THRESHOLDs!!!

Lance was just below the "threshold" .... that is what they meant by THRESHOLD. Lance had a su****ious sample because he was just below the threshold. You said either there was or was not .... that was a shot at YOU and the Mayweather Mafia team!!! Ooops!


.







.

LMAOOOO. YOU ARE A MORON!!!!

1. Testing can happen at anytime before the fight. You are arguing that Mayweather doesn’t know that or will take a chance right before the fight when he wanted testing specifically UP TO THE FIGHT. LMAOOOO. GAME OVER CLOWN.

2. I mean why was he dehydrated for the Mosley fight when he doesn’t go up and down in weight? Because he was working out right? Now, did he run before the DCO came? Did he have the runs? What do you know? (Nothing)

3. Novizky did not contradict himself you desperate bafoon. He said it would be thoroughly vetted and your proof that it wasn’t was that it took 2 days for 3 doctors to decide if an IV was appropriate. Lmao.


4. Don’t talk about thresholds son. We both know you got destroyed!

[Shape up]

Ya dumb bltch!

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

More concentrated than drinking water ******, now answer how he was given a retro tue without usada breaking WADA rules, without referring to the ISTUE as we already know that doesn't meet the criteria

[travestyny]

More concentrated than drinking water ******, now answer how he was given a retro tue without usada breaking WADA rules, without referring to the ISTUE as we already know that doesn't meet the criteria

AHAHAHAHA. More concentrated than drinking water is your contribution???


You are an idiot. Shut ya dumb ass up, unless you can explain how the specific gravity test was fooled by a “concentrated sample”

And are you saying the ISTUE isn’t supposed to be followed??? Lol. You are so dumb. Buzz off.

[Shape up]

You didn't answer the questions gimp, floyds a cheat, simple explaination, you couldn't manage to show any proper or right way around the fact he was given an IV to mask peds

[travestyny]

You didn't answer the questions gimp, floyds a cheat, simple explaination, you couldn't manage to show any proper or right way around the fact he was given an IV to mask peds

Dude, after what I did to you, don’t you think you should go back to avoiding this thread?

Unless you can respond to my questions, moron.

1. How did he dilute his sample with a more concentrated sample?

2. Do you admit that Hauser got his math wrong?

3. Why would WADA Comment on USADA breaking their rules, according to you, and not punish them, you complete moron!

[Shape up]

Dude, after what I did to you, don’t you think you should go back to avoiding this thread?

Unless you can respond to my questions, moron.

1. How did he dilute his sample with a more concentrated sample?

2. Do you admit that Hauser got his math wrong?

3. Why would WADA Comment on USADA breaking their rules, according to you, and not punish them, you complete moron!

So here is the first question you need to answer----------------Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is prohibited at all timeswithout prior TUE approval

[Shape up]

Here is the second question to answer--------------------------WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that would be monitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE [COLOR="red"]could[/COLOR allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative. however, the spokesperson added: “This case is not one that was monitored by WADA because the World Boxing Council is not a signatory to the Code. We understand that USADA was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight, however.”

[Shape up]

You can talk **** all you want ******NY, BUT YOU HAVENT ANSWERED THESE QUESTIONS ABOVE, these are the rules usada broke to help fluid jnr

[travestyny]

So here is the first question you need to answer----------------Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is prohibited at all timeswithout prior TUE approval

You still don't know what retroactive means, do you? LMAOOOOOO. Go play in traffic, son.

Why the **** would WADA say that according to their rules, a retroactive TUE can be given?

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that would be monitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative. However, the spokesperson added: “This case is not one that is monitored by WADA because the World Boxing Council is not a signatory to the Code. We understand that USADA was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight, however.”


Now are you going to explain how you dilute with a concentrated sample?

[travestyny]

Here is the second question to answer--------------------------WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that would be monitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE [COLOR="red"]could[/COLOR allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative. however, the spokesperson added: “This case is not one that was monitored by WADA because the World Boxing Council is not a signatory to the Code. We understand that USADA was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight, however.”

What do you think that means, you moron