Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[ADP02]

Yo, ADP02, I'm going to do you dirty right now. This is how you end a debate


You think you're right about Salazar manipulating TUE's right? Ok. Don't worry, I'm not going to challenge you to a dome duel...but similar.

Billeau has been around more nowadays. Let me remind you, he believes that Pacquiao won the Mayweather fight. Also, Zaroku has been around, and you trust him to give a fair assessment of things. I also trust both of these dudes.

I say we submit ONE and only ONE post to one of these guys. We ask them if they will agree to judge it. You give ALL of your evidence that Salazar manipulated TUES (which will be like....no evidence) and I give all of my evidence that he didn't (which would be a fair amount), and we see whom they agree with.


Deal? Oh, I forgot to add the fine print. THIS WILL BE FOR A PERMANENT BAN.


I BET YOU BlTCH OUT. I'M WILLING TO PUT MY ACCOUNT ON THE LINE THAT THEY WILL AGREE WITH ME MORE THAN YOUR DUMB ASS. DO YOU ACCEPT?


AFTER YOU DECLINE, GO GIVE ME THAT LINK, YOU PUNK BlTCH

Actually lets do one on this since you couldn't admit that you were WRONG.


Question for the Mayweather Mafia dudes:
On Salazar/Dr Brown & company ....
"Was Travestyny WRONG when he said that they didn't need a TUE because the IVs were <50ml?"


USADA stated:
Reason why Travestyny WAS WRONG:
Initial protocol was > 50ml so it required a TUE.

Updated protocol was still > 50ml so it required a TUE.



* Judges cannot vote for someone just because 1 guy posts more.

* Judges must actually understand what they are voting on.

* Travestyny must actually understand what he agreed on.

* Judges must actually have the time to read the post. LOL



After you decline, go respond to my post like you said you would about Ian McCall .... DEFLECTOR!




Just like I told you, Salazar and company tried to get the drugs no matter which way he can.

So the question that you should ask that you cannot agree on is:
"Do you think that Salazar would try anything and everything to get his athletes meds even if it includes trying to get a TUE when his athletes do not require one or do not require one for the given dose"






Now read the below:

John Cook, who coached at the Oregon Project from 2003 to 2005, told Runner’s World that he was “not surprised” at the allegations regarding Salazar.

In an interview with the BBC, he said “runners were getting [the****utic use exemptions] left and right.”

You still believe that TUEs were not being abuses?


and then he says this:

SD: Along those lines, when you were asked to work with the program, that reputation in some ways already existed. Did that concern you at the time? How did you deal with that?

JC: It concerned me a great deal.

For instance, getting a The****utic Use Exemption for an inhaler can be very easily done.

If I take you and run your ass up and down the stairs five or six or seven times, then take you into the doctor, you’re going to be asthmatic and fail the test, and you’re going to be allowed to take an inhaler.

You still think that Salazar and company were not abusing TUEs? LOL



.

[travestyny]

Actually lets do one on this since you couldn't admit that you were WRONG.


Question for the Mayweather Mafia dudes:
On Salazar/Dr Brown & company ....
"Was Travestyny WRONG when he said that they didn't need a TUE because the IVs were <50ml?"

JESUS CHRIST. YOU MORON. I STOPPED READING RIGHT HERE BECAUSE THIS IS NOT WHAT I SAID. HOW CAN YOU NOT COMPREHEND THIS!!????


I DIDN'T SAY HE DIDN'T NEED A TUE. I SAID ACCORDING TO HIM, HE DIDN'T NEED A TUE. THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF THE ****ING INVESTIGATION YOU IDIOT. HERE IS PROOF OF THIS YET AGAIN!!!!

ARE YOU ******ED OR JUST NOT ABLE TO COMPREHEND ANYTHING. THAT IS THE WHOLE ****ING POINT. I TOLD YOU THAT HE WAS GIVING SMALL INJECTIONS AND TRYING TO CLAIM THAT THEY WERE NOT CONSIDERED AN INFUSION OVER 50ML, BUT USADA BELIEVES THAT IS BULLSHlT AND IT DOES CONSTITUTE AN INFUSION OF OVER 50ML.

IF I'M TELLING YOU USADA BELIEVES IT WAS BULLSHlT, HOW THE **** ARE YOU SAYING THAT I SAID HE DIDN'T NEED A TUE.


AND HERE IS PROOF OF THAT:

HI Dathan, Alvina ,and Galen, For your interest. When asked about an Infusion, you are to say no. LCarnitine and Iron in the way we have it done is classified as an injection. So no TUE’s and no declaration needed, not online and not when asked about infusions when getting drug tested in or out of competition.. Thanks.- Alberto

EVEN YOU POSTED IT YOU IDIOT. HERE YOU POSTED ABOUT THEM CHANGING TO AN EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN 50ML PROCEDURE, AND USADA SAYING THAT IT WAS STILL BREAKING THEIR RULES!!!!

Yet, there is a significant hole in Magness’s description of multiple injections which collectively exceeded the 50 mL WADA infusion limit but were spaced to circumvent the 50 mL limit.

YOU ****ING DOPE!

AND ONCE AGAIN, HERE YOU ARE ARGUING THAT HE DIDN'T HAVE A TUE......SO HOW THE **** DID HE MANIPULATE INFORMATION TO GET A TUE WHEN HE DIDN'T GET ONE?


IS IT MY FAULT THAT YOU CAN'T COMPREHEND THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE?????? Give the **** up, you idiot.

AND GIVE ME THAT LINK!

[travestyny]

Actually lets do one on this since you couldn't admit that you were WRONG.


Question for the Mayweather Mafia dudes:
On Salazar/Dr Brown & company ....
"Was Travestyny WRONG when he said that they didn't need a TUE because the IVs were <50ml?"


USADA stated:
Reason why Travestyny WAS WRONG:
Initial protocol was > 50ml so it required a TUE.

Updated protocol was still > 50ml so it required a TUE.



* Judges cannot vote for someone just because 1 guy posts more.

* Judges must actually understand what they are voting on.

* Travestyny must actually understand what he agreed on.

* Judges must actually have the time to read the post. LOL



After you decline, go respond to my post like you said you would about Ian McCall .... DEFLECTOR!




Just like I told you, Salazar and company tried to get the drugs no matter which way he can.

So the question that you should ask that you cannot agree on is:
"Do you think that Salazar would try anything and everything to get his athletes meds even if it includes trying to get a TUE when his athletes do not require one or do not require one for the given dose"






Now read the below:



You still believe that TUEs were not being abuses?


and then he says this:





You still think that Salazar and company were not abusing TUEs? LOL



.

READ THE REST. CHALLENGE ACCEPTED. ANYTIME, ANY PLACE. LET'S GO.

WHAT'S THE TOPIC. IS IT WHETHER SALAZAR WAS ABUSING THE TUE PROCESS TO GET TUE'S FOR ATHLETES THAT DIDN'T NEED THEM?

ACCEPTED!!!!!!! SET IT UP!

GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR POST ABOUT TUE'S BEING ACCEPTED LEFT AND RIGHT. BECAUSE THERE WERE ONLY 4 SINCE 2011


PERMA-BAN BET, RIGHT? YES??? ARE YOU READY TO DO THIS?

[travestyny]

Question for the Mayweather Mafia dudes:
On Salazar/Dr Brown & company ....
"Was Travestyny WRONG when he said that they didn't need a TUE because the IVs were <50ml?"

Or is this the one that you want to challenge me over. CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!!!!


GO FIND A QUOTATION WITH ME DEFINITIVELY SAYING THAT HE DIDN'T NEED A TUE FOR HIS PROCEDURE AS OPPOSED TO HIM TELLING HIS ATHLETES THAT THEY DIDN'T NEED A TUE. FIND ME SAYING HE IS INNOCENT OF ANYTHING OTHER THAN MANIPULATING THE TUE PROCESS. FIND ME SAYING THAT THE INFUSIONS THAT WERE AT OR BELOW 50ML WERE ACCORDING TO WADA RULES.


QUOTE ME! LET'S SEE WHAT YOU GOT AND SEE IF IT CAN BE PROVEN THAT I SAID HE DID EVERYTHING ACCORDING TO THE WADA RULES. YOU CAN HANDLE THAT, CAN'T YOU?


AGAIN...CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!!!! WAITING ON YOU!

[ADP02]

JESUS CHRIST. YOU MORON. I STOPPED READING RIGHT HERE BECAUSE THIS IS NOT WHAT I SAID. HOW CAN YOU NOT COMPREHEND THIS!!????


I DIDN'T SAY HE DIDN'T NEED A TUE. I SAID ACCORDING TO HIM, HE DIDN'T NEED A TUE. THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF THE ****ING INVESTIGATION YOU IDIOT. HERE IS PROOF OF THIS YET AGAIN!!!!




IF I'M TELLING YOU USADA BELIEVES IT WAS BULLSHlT, HOW THE **** ARE YOU SAYING THAT I SAID HE DIDN'T NEED A TUE.


AND HERE IS PROOF OF THAT:



EVEN YOU POSTED IT YOU IDIOT. HERE YOU POSTED ABOUT THEM CHANGING TO AN EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN 50ML PROCEDURE, AND USADA SAYING THAT IT WAS STILL BREAKING THEIR RULES!!!!



YOU ****ING DOPE!

AND ONCE AGAIN, HERE YOU ARE ARGUING THAT HE DIDN'T HAVE A TUE......SO HOW THE **** DID HE MANIPULATE INFORMATION TO GET A TUE WHEN HE DIDN'T GET ONE?


IS IT MY FAULT THAT YOU CAN'T COMPREHEND THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE?????? Give the **** up, you idiot.

AND GIVE ME THAT LINK!

DEFLECTO

So what you are REALLY SAYING is that you got it WRONG so you cannot accept the challenge. Got it!!!



You are struggling with this .....

Initially you couldn't comprehend and ever since I corrected you, SEVERAL TIMEs, you have been SQUIRMING to try to pretend that you never said or meant .... bla bla bla




You said this:

travestyny

The guy gave infusions, via small injections under 50ml.

He had several emails with someone at USADA who specializes in TUE's to understand the rules and in particular when a TUE would NOT have to be applied for.

Oh, and there is a document detailing all of this, once again, BY USADA. Isn't it ironic that each time you deflect to another athlete, it's USADA who is on their ass?

WRONG!!! The guy did NOT give infusions under 50ml!!!!


WRONG!!! They needed a TUE!!! Why? The infusion was > 50ml!!!



.

[travestyny]

DEFLECTO

So what you are REALLY SAYING is that you got it WRONG so you cannot accept the challenge. Got it!!!



You are struggling with this .....

Initially you couldn't comprehend and ever since I corrected you, SEVERAL TIMEs, you have been SQUIRMING to try to pretend that you never said or meant .... bla bla bla




You said this:






WRONG!!! The guy did NOT give infusions under 50ml!!!!


WRONG!!! They needed a TUE!!! Why? The infusion was > 50ml!!!


.

Are you ******ed? More proof that you can’t read


I accepted the challenge, idiot!

Are you saying he didn’t have emails with a TUE specialist to understand when a TUE does not have to be applied for? Let me know, bro. I’m sure I can get you that information!

AND DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT “INFUSIONS VIA SMALL INJECTIONS” MEANS? Lmaooooooo.

I got info on that too. So we good to go or what?

By the way, where is that link??? I’ve only asked 30 times!!!

[ADP02]

Did you just say what am I talking about? Dudeeeeee.....





I SIMPLY ASKED YOU FOR THE LINK TO THIS ABOUT 30 TIMES NOW. WHY ARE YOU PLAYING ******? ALL I WANTED TO SEE WAS WHY THE **** WOULD ANYONE BE SEALING A PARTIAL SAMPLE IN THE A VESSEL, BUT WHEN I ASKED FOR THE LINK YOU AVOIDED, AND AVOIDED AND AVOIDED. NEED PROOF:



THIS ISN'T EVEN AN UPDATED LIST. ALL I ASKED FOR WAS YOU TO SEND ME THE LINK TO YOUR QUOTATION. DO YOU HAVE IT OR NOT?

I do not have the link but I will search for this while you contemplate on how to respond (damage control) to my previous post....



.

[travestyny]

I do not have the link but I will search for this while you contemplate on how to respond (damage control) to my previous post....



.

LMAOOOO. YOU COMPLETE MORON. I RESPONDED TO YOUR PREVIOUS POST TWO POSTS AGO. I ACCEPTED THE CHALLENGE!!!

[ADP02]

Actually lets do one on this since you couldn't admit that you were WRONG.


Question for the Mayweather Mafia dudes:
On Salazar/Dr Brown & company ....
"Was Travestyny WRONG when he said that they didn't need a TUE because the IVs were <50ml?"


USADA stated:
Reason why Travestyny WAS WRONG:
Initial protocol was > 50ml so it required a TUE.

Updated protocol was still > 50ml so it required a TUE.



* Judges cannot vote for someone just because 1 guy posts more.

* Judges must actually understand what they are voting on.

* Travestyny must actually understand what he agreed on.

* Judges must actually have the time to read the post. LOL



After you decline, go respond to my post like you said you would about Ian McCall .... DEFLECTOR!




Just like I told you, Salazar and company tried to get the drugs no matter which way he can.

So the question that you should ask that you cannot agree on is:
"Do you think that Salazar would try anything and everything to get his athletes meds even if it includes trying to get a TUE when his athletes do not require one or do not require one for the given dose"






Now read the below:



You still believe that TUEs were not being abuses?


and then he says this:





You still think that Salazar and company were not abusing TUEs? LOL



.

Are you ******ed? More proof that you can’t read


I accepted the challenge, idiot!

Did you even know what the challenge would be?


* Travestyny must actually understand what he agreed on.


See quote above: When you read the document you actually thought that the meds were infused < 50ml


Who is right?
Travestyny: The infusion was < 50ml

ADP02: Understood that the infusion was NOT < 50ml



.

[travestyny]

Did you even know what the challenge would be?


* Travestyny must actually understand what he agreed on.


See quote above: When you read the document you actually thought that the meds were infused < 50ml


Who is right?
Travestyny: The infusion was < 50ml

ADP02: Understood that the infusion was NOT < 50ml



.

Dude. I accepted the challenge! You claim I was saying he was acting according to the rules and didn’t need a TUE, right?

I’m claiming that your ****** ass has low comprehension skills and I’m saying he gave small injections that USADA believes were consistent with infusions that exceeded the limit, though his purpose for the small injections was to avoid the TUE process.

Am I missing something? Perma ban bet on this right? You ready?