Comments Thread For: Golovkin-Canelo Winner Will Likely Be Ordered To Face Charlo
Collapse
-
I threw one punch, landed it, for a 100% connection rate. it was a power punch too. I win. Golovkin was the aggressor, threw more, landed more, and missed a ton of rights (especially when canelo was in the corner, i dont know how he ddint correct even tho sanchez put it out there for him). Canelo did great, sure, but he didn't win. If you think he did you're part of a small minority (unless you live in mexico, holy **** are they bias) But thats neither here nor there. you are still a hatin ass hater.Comment
-
Comment
-
Did you read all my posts before you actually commented on my posts?? I said it was a great, close fight that could have gone either way. Not once did I say Triple g lost. Yes he threw more, missed more, and landed more. He connected way more jabs while Canelo connected way more body punches. Overall, I thought Canelo connected the more meaningful punches. So it all depends on what you like to see.I threw one punch, landed it, for a 100% connection rate. it was a power punch too. I win. Golovkin was the aggressor, threw more, landed more, and missed a ton of rights (especially when canelo was in the corner, i dont know how he ddint correct even tho sanchez put it out there for him). Canelo did great, sure, but he didn't win. If you think he did you're part of a small minority (unless you live in mexico, holy **** are they bias) But thats neither here nor there. you are still a hatin ass hater.
So how am I a hater??Comment
-
back to the topic at hand...charlo will lose to either because both of them are far more experienced and will be able to neutralize the youthful vigor. Charlo is a great fighter but still has a long way to go to compete with either GGG or canelo.Comment
-
Why would I be pissed off? I said earlier that if you thought triple g won cause he was the more aggressive fighter then fine. But in all reality I thought it was a great close fight that could have gone either way.Comment
-
completely fair.Did you read all my posts before you actually commented on my posts?? I said it was a great, close fight that could have gone either way. Not once did I say Triple g lost. Yes he threw more, missed more, and landed more. He connected way more jabs while Canelo connected way more body punches. Overall, I thought Canelo connected the more meaningful punches. So it all depends on what you like to see.
So how am I a hater??
but to say GGG didnt do **** is ridiculous.
like the midget pron flaggot train. Right?Comment
-
This is the smartest thing you've said all night!Comment
-
Watch the fight again. Canelo was running, fighting only a few seconds in each round. Most of the rounds he spent by running without countering. He won only some episodes, but not the whole fight. To win the champion you must dominate, in close fights champion gets the victory.See that's what dumb mother****ers like you think! You dumb ****s obviously don't comprehend boxing.
The name of the game is Boxing not brawling! Hit and not get hit!
Canelo boxed him and it was a great fight, no matter what idiots like you say. You obviously have no appreciation for the art of boxing so maybe you should stick to gay, midget p orn if all you wanna see is two guys going at it full contact!Comment
Comment