Why do the same posters who claim VADA is the best side with Wilders dirty foes?

[WesternChamp]

How is it silly if its a fact? VADA is cheaper = Fact, VADA has more client in boxing = Fact, now you can tell me the USADA has more in terms of the sport yes i would agree because they look after the whole country, but so far only 2/3 boxers has being able to use USADA, countless of boxer has use VADA and the WBC uses VADA which means more boxers are enrolled with them. Those are facts not friction or opinion or a like/dislike for either of those agencies.

how is usada still in business then??

[Ray*]

how is usada still in business then??

Do you know what USADA does? They are taxpayers funded. They are the recognised testing agency under the WADA code, funded by the US Government/people to test ALL athletes in every sport to make sure they are clean, they are working for the people and can be queried by the general public at anytime....They are answerable to the taxpayers.

They are NOT a private company like VADA, am actually laughing right now that people actually think USADA are a profit making company.

[travestyny]

Yep, he will call in his alt dumbconsumption soon to try and give him credit

LOL!! i called him out on that before.

The two village idiots still at it.

If you believe I use an alt, I've told the both of you multiple times. Let's do a perma-ban bet. We agree to let the mods check my IP address.

If you are wrong, goodbye. Do you man up, or are your balls buried in your purses?

[MurkaMan]

That might be true.

I've not really looked into the numbers myself. However it did become a fact that there was a huge ratio difference in fighters getting caught by VADA compared to USADA, then that should be looked into and investigated.

Your comment, and I say this with no disrespect, is ******. I dont gaf about the ratio of who pops people vs who dont.

I guess I will repeat the comment you responded too; They arent going to pop anyone if everyone they test is clean.

I mean I literally said that in the comment you responded to. I dont get your comment even a little bit. You need to test a DIRTY fighter, for him to come up dirty. Vada tested allot of dirty fighters. Usada did not, until we hear otherwise.

[travestyny]

I've shown you where WADA states you cannot get a retro TUE for mild dehydration,

You haven't shown anything other than that you had no idea what the word retroactive meant.

Now go fetch Mayweather's medical record and the TUE application that was APPROVED OF BY THE TUEC WHICH IS A GROUP OF AT LEAST 3 DOCTORS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE ATHLETE'S NAME ON THE APPLICATION.

Yea, I remember I told you that before. You said I was lying. When I showed you proof........you basically said that you were just bullshltting. LMAO.

You're truly a moron. I mean that.

now show me where WADA states that floyd is allowed to have an IV performed in his lounge room, I bet you cant

You made the wrong bet, dumbo.

[TheBigLug]

Your comment, and I say this with no disrespect, is ******. I dont gaf about the ratio of who pops people vs who dont.

I guess I will repeat the comment you responded too; They arent going to pop anyone if everyone they test is clean.

I mean I literally said that in the comment you responded to. I dont get your comment even a little bit. You need to test a DIRTY fighter, for him to come up dirty. Vada tested allot of dirty fighters. Usada did not, until we hear otherwise.

I think you're missing the point of what i was saying.

Say if VADA were catching people at a 30:1 ratio compared to USADA, then i'd have to say there's something quite a miss there. It could be that it was the truth, but it's very unlikely that VADA would end up with that many dirty tests compared to USADA. Very, very unlikely.

I don't know what the statistics are in reality, it was just making a point that if they are wildly different between the two organisations, then i'd have to assume something is not right.

But maybe you're more trusting/naive than i am.

[GhostofDempsey]

I've shown you where WADA states you cannot get a retro TUE for mild dehydration, now show me where WADA states that floyd is allowed to have an IV performed in his lounge room, I bet you cant

You're talking too much truth to a guy who is willing to take a bullet for Floyd Mayweather. LMAO!

[Shape up]

You haven't shown anything other than that you had no idea what the word retroactive meant.

Now go fetch Mayweather's medical record and the TUE application that was APPROVED OF BY THE TUEC WHICH IS A GROUP OF AT LEAST 3 DOCTORS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE ATHLETE'S NAME ON THE APPLICATION.

Yea, I remember I told you that before. You said I was lying. When I showed you proof........you basically said that you were just bullshltting. LMAO.

You're truly a moron. I mean that.




You made the wrong bet, dumbo.

Doesn't say there he is allowed to have the IV in his loungroom, I showed where it says he can't, come on brainiac, you need to defend fluid Jnr better than that

[travestyny]

Doesn't say there he is allowed to have the IV in his loungroom, I showed where it says he can't, come on brainiac, you need to defend fluid Jnr better than that

You really are slow, aren't you? Look at the image again and tell me which one applies to Mayweather. Also tell me what it says at the top.

Then feel ****** like you always do and log off.

[travestyny]

You're talking too much truth to a guy who is willing to take a bullet for Floyd Mayweather. LMAO!

Shut up you ducking bltch. You already made a dumb ass thread where 90% agreed you're a moron. Keep putting posters on ignore when you can't defend yourself, clown.