Why do the same posters who claim VADA is the best side with Wilders dirty foes?

[Kigali]

if they use the same testing agency, why is it only vada that is catching the cheaters?

There is something wrong with you....maybe you should stop eating dinner at the Kennel.

[Ray*]

if they use the same testing agency, why is it only vada that is catching the cheaters?

Because more people are signed up to VADA than USADA? VADA are cheaper so they get more work, which is great for them. Am glad people are getting caught, we came from "Testing is for cowards" to VADA are catching cheaters within 8 years, thats great progress for boxing.

[WesternChamp]

Because more people are signed up to VADA than USADA? VADA are cheaper so they get more work, which is great for them. Am glad people are getting caught, we came from "Testing is for cowards" to VADA are catching cheaters within 8 years, thats great progress for boxing.

Lol you act like usada doesn't get any business. "Because more peoole is signed to vada".. if vada is catching cheaters you would think they'll avoid vada and go to usada and cough up the extra doe to keep it under the rug, nah mean?

Testing or no fight is for coward. Just testing in itself, i have no problem with that.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Just for the record...

VADA pops guys for things that later trigger endless threads about the severity or benefit (Luis Ortiz most recently). All I see is people making excuses for the blood pressure meds.

USADA pops guys for things that are tied to a performance benefit.

So it begs the question: Is your interest to catch cheaters or is your interest just to get a guy to pop over what might be nothing for headlines?

[WesternChamp]

There is something wrong with you....maybe you should stop eating dinner at the Kennel.

Im on a diet brotha. mosquitoes burgers for me only. Look that up

[Ray*]

Lol you act like usada doesn't get any business. "Because more peoole is signed to vada"..
.

So you ask a question, i provided you with an answer but you disagree? IMHO more people are using VADA in boxing than USADA, the WBC even have VADA for their testing protocol. So all that childish "Lol" stuff that you are doing is just that childish.

[Ray*]

Just for the record...

VADA pops guys for things that later trigger endless threads about the severity or benefit (Luis Ortiz most recently). All I see is people making excuses for the blood pressure meds.

USADA pops guys for things that are tied to a performance benefit.

So it begs the question: Is your interest to catch cheaters or is your interest just to get a guy to pop over what might be nothing for headlines?

Thats a very good post, but how do we know that both agencies doesn't look for the same thing in their respective testing?

[WesternChamp]

So you ask a question, i provided you with an answer but you disagree? IMHO more people are using VADA in boxing than USADA, the WBC even have VADA for their testing protocol. So all that childish "Lol" stuff that you are doing is just that childish.

because its silly to say vada catches more because more people is signed to them. there's obviously some thing going on behind closed doors that we dont know about.

[paulf]

You know why

[Ray*]

because its silly to say vada catches more because more people is signed to them. there's obviously some thing going on behind closed doors that we dont know about.

How is it silly if its a fact? VADA is cheaper = Fact, VADA has more client in boxing = Fact, now you can tell me the USADA has more in terms of the sport yes i would agree because they look after the whole country, but so far only 2/3 boxers has being able to use USADA, countless of boxer has use VADA and the WBC uses VADA which means more boxers are enrolled with them. Those are facts not friction or opinion or a like/dislike for either of those agencies.