i spoke too soon. its here. LOL!!!
Why do the same posters who claim VADA is the best side with Wilders dirty foes?
Collapse
-
-
It does? Can you provide us with the proof? Thanks. That will surely clear some things up for us!
But if you can't provide it, will you admit that you straight up lied and pulled that from your a$s?
This directly contradicts your information:
WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that would be monitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative.
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Ortiz is black and disqualified for using a prescibed diuretic for a confirmed heart condition and he has been willing to go the extra mile to prove it was not masking any peds but VADA and Dibella aint interested in anything but StiverneLast edited by maracho; 10-03-2017, 12:35 PM.Comment
-
Put me down as one who thinks it's the fault of the boxer's who failed the test and not Wilder's fault. He is trying to be a good champion now and fight the best available contenders. Good for Wilder. Vada is working for the good of boxing. They aren't working for Wilder.Comment
-
UFC has had their stars pop dirty with USADA left and right. US Olympians get caught by them constantly. The entire USADA vs VADA "controversy" is something boxing promoters cooked up because VADA is much more controllable and corruptible due to their dependence on boxing money.Comment
Comment