Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So, who has the better resume - Crawford or GGG?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • So, who has the better resume - Crawford or GGG?

    First thing - I believe Crawford is the best fighter in the world.

    But perhaps our dear friends who consider Gennady to be a hypejob who has fought no-one can tell us how his resume stacks up with Bud's.

    Just a quick line up of each's notable names:

    GGG

    Canelo
    Jacobs
    Brook
    Lemieux
    Murray
    Geale
    Macklin


    Crawford

    Indongo
    Postol
    Diaz
    Burns
    Gamboa
    Dulorme
    Beltran
    47
    GGG
    74.47%
    35
    Crawford
    25.53%
    12

  • #2



    Can you add a public poll?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Beercules View Post



      Can you add a public poll?
      Added

      Comment


      • #4
        GGG by far better resume, it’s not even close. He is the wrong skin color for most of the haters though...

        Comment


        • #5
          It is really sad this is even up for debate honestly..GGG is 35 and Crawford is 29..Crawfords been pro for 9 years while GGG has been pro for 11 years

          Comment


          • #6
            cant add Canelo to his resume when he didnt win

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by larryxxx. View Post
              It is really sad this is even up for debate honestly..GGG is 35 and Crawford is 29..Crawfords been pro for 9 years while GGG has been pro for 11 years
              How is it sad it is even up for debate? What does that even mean? Gennady has been a pro for 2 more years? That's the metric you are using?

              What a bizarre post. You seem to be implying Gennady should have a far better resume than the p4p best fighter because he's been pro 2 more years?

              Comment


              • #8
                Golovkin has Jacobs and Canelo which pretty much puts him far over the top. If Crawford was to beat both Spence and Thurman I think an argument can be made for him have the superior resume depending on what Golovkin goes on to do next.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by larryxxx. View Post
                  It is really sad this is even up for debate honestly..GGG is 35 and Crawford is 29..Crawfords been pro for 9 years while GGG has been pro for 11 years
                  Crawford is 30-years-old, he's by no means a spring chicken himself.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by larryxxx. View Post
                    cant add Canelo to his resume when he didnt win
                    Really? You can't add it? Why, because Adelaide Byrde said so? And because Don Trella gave the 7th round to Canelo?

                    So, Canelo is not part of Gennady's resume because of sheer incompetence of 2 judges?

                    I don't know if you know this but a huge number of people thought GGG won (including Canelo's Mexican fans in the stadium), and for the record, in the books, he didn't lose either.

                    But you think that should be scrubbed off?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP