Ortiz another juice up ****... that's pathetic
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Luis Ortiz Fails Drug Test, Deontay Wilder Fight in Doubt
Collapse
-
-
-
-
I'm backing VADA testing... OK...
... Pvetkin was on PEDs... Ortiz is on PEDs... OK...
But Andrzej Wawrzyk??? Who the fuck was Andrzej Wawrzyk??? The article reads: "Nine months later (after Povetkin...), Poland’s Andrzej Wawrzyk tested positive for Stanozolol, an anabolic steroid, and was removed from his fight against Wilder."... Somebody explain me who the fuck was this Andrzej Wawrzyk (because I can't find him among the WBC contenders...), and how the fuck he was "selected" to fight Wilder (just after Povetkin)???
In order to conclude -- Wilder's (proposed) opponents: Povetkin (caught on PEDs); Wawrzyk (caught on PEDs); Ortiz (caught on PEDs)...
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View Postmost State commissions have a rule that if there is a change to the Main Event, the promoter must offer refunds.
here is the rule as it pertains to Florida........
548.066 Ticket refunds.—
(1) Upon the postponement, substitution of either participant, or cancellation of the main event or the entire program of matches, the promoter shall refund the full purchase price of a ticket to each person presenting a ticket for a refund within 30 days after the scheduled date of the event. Within 10 days after the expiration of the 30-day period, the promoter shall pay all unclaimed ticket receipts to the commission. The commission shall hold the funds for 1 year and make refunds during such time to any person presenting a ticket for a refund. Thereafter, the commission shall pay all remaining moneys from the ticket sale to the Chief Financial Officer for deposit into the General Revenue Fund.
(2) For failure to comply with this section, the commission may declare a promoter’s bond or other security forfeited, suspend or revoke the license of a promoter, and impose any other penalty provided.
History.—ss. 2, 4, ch. 84-246; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 650, ch. 2003-261; s. 13, ch. 2014-128.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Superarms1 View PostThe hctz correct is s very mild diuretic for hypertension which means his blood pressure is not even that bad, it's like the weakest med a Dr can prescribe for hypertension. However how is a beta blocker a performance enhancing drug bro? Lol. Beta blockers slow down the heart rate and if anything he would not be able to even box because his heart rate won't increase during the fight and he would pass out. These beta blocker...if they are alpha blockers or calcium channel blockers..and if they are first or second generation blockers will all do the same effect. Beta blockers make the brain and heart receptors slow down, therefore if he was on it he would be calm as hell, and lack stamina... even power. Now what is being said is that what was actually found was a masking agent, the same agent to mask PED/steroids/testosterone. However Ortiz's camp is saying that the masking agent was so they would not find out he was on a Alpha blocker and hctz. Which are by far not PEDs. So spare me Ortiz. Now a banned substance could be a drug called lasix which is given for people with congestive heart failure, liver failure, or kidney failure...but that's for old , overweight people that usually have less than ten years to live. BUT some athletes use it to make weight as it is 100 times strong than hctz to make you pee up a storm. Hctz usually makes a patient pee once after taking it then they just pee through out the day like normal people not on it. However they are both diuretics (hctz and lasix) so it could be that. But heck he doesn't need to make weight this is the heavyweight division lol. So guys it could be the diuretic of hctz which btw you don't need to be diabetic to be on. (****** article acting like they are in the medical field) but a expensive masking agent for something he has a prescription for? ...so 65% PED he may be on or because the hctz being the weakest diuretic in the world lol 35 % that would be the reason. But making agent is why he failed I'm leaning towards PEDs. Yes I'm a PA and Paramedic for LAFD for 18 years and I've been a boxer for even longer. Lol what I'm curious about is when AJ fights Wilder for the WBC belt will that dude pass a test being a part time body builder lol. We shall see gents.
Something to do with it keeps you heart rate lower during exercise that can give you better cardio . I might be wrong but I'm sure that fit Russian chick got pulled for it
Hopefully the fight goes ahead . It's sucks for Wilder big time
Chisora is in top shape that's a fight I would love to see wilder chisora / whyte
Big money in the uk and a easyier fight for bongsquad
Comment
-
Originally posted by MDPopescu View PostI'm backing VADA testing... OK...
... Pvetkin was on PEDs... Ortiz is on PEDs... OK...
But Andrzej Wawrzyk??? Who the fuck was Andrzej Wawrzyk??? The article reads: "Nine months later (after Povetkin...), Poland’s Andrzej Wawrzyk tested positive for Stanozolol, an anabolic steroid, and was removed from his fight against Wilder."... Somebody explain me who the fuck was this Andrzej Wawrzyk (because I can't find him among the WBC contenders...), and how the fuck he was "selected" to fight Wilder (just after Povetkin)???
In order to conclude -- Wilder's (proposed) opponents: Povetkin (caught on PEDs); Wawrzyk (caught on PEDs); Ortiz (caught on PEDs)...
The one he said "don't fail a drugs test" etc
Maybe these guys are all cheating kents but it's a strange one for Ortiz to let this mega fight get cancelled . Especially after waiting so long for a shot
Daft situation for him to be in
Comment
Comment