Just great! Now people are going to start kneeling at boxing events cause of this. The oppression of Crawford not being #1 with a weaker resume.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Gennady Golovkin is now ranked #1 P4P by ESPN
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Rip Chudd View PostWhere does the fair and objective Boxrec computer have him ranked?
Edit: Just looked it up myself. Seems GGG is 3rd behind Terence Crawford and the new #1 Saul Canelo Alvarez
Well so much for espn's rankings. If Freedom has taught me anything it's that we all must bow to the will of the Boxrec computer. It has spoken!
So although GGG should have won a decision over Canelo, the computer accepts the draw as reality.
Similarly, although Mayweather lost to Castillo in their first fight, the BoxRec computer goes by the "official" decision and so ranks Floyd higher than he actually deserves.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View PostYo me they're doing the same thing they did with Roman Gonzalez. Neither him or Golovkin have looked good in a LOOOOOONG time. So I don't see any justification for it when you have guys fighting similar levels of talent and completely dominating them.
You can't be p4p#1 with no convincing wins over top guys.
Comment
-
-
I guess so, nobody else has a strong claim right now. It feel weird though having a guy who looked sensational fighting bums then stepped up in class and had could've-gone-either-way type fights as number 1.
Comment
-
Since Roy Jones left the number 1 spot, the pound for pound rankings is just a popularity contest.
Comment
-
lol, just let the man have it, even if it's only by 1 publication. He's what? 35? 36? He won't have it much longer or ever again.
I really hate to say it, but GGG truly missed the super stardom train by about 7 years. If you think he's slipping, yeah, most likely he is. He's out of his prime already and only got great conditioning that makes up for his age. Don't be surprised at all if GGG's next fight is against a lesser known opponent and he takes a "L".
Comment
Comment