Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford: Mikey Garcia Fight Would Have To Be at 147

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MisanthropicNY
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2014
    • 7680
    • 288
    • 6
    • 37,612

    #11
    I'm still wondering why nobody points out that Crawford has one of the weakest resumes of the so-called "lb for lb top 10"...

    Crawford beat a chinny blown featherweight who just lost again and Postol... Wow, what a resume!

    Comment

    • Dramacyde
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2016
      • 1442
      • 66
      • 0
      • 21,771

      #12
      Bob Arum would never do business with Garcia again.

      Comment

      • rrayvez
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 3769
        • 671
        • 53
        • 19,715

        #13
        Originally posted by MisanthropicNY
        I'm still wondering why nobody points out that Crawford has one of the weakest resumes of the so-called "lb for lb top 10"...

        Crawford beat a chinny blown featherweight who just lost again and Postol... Wow, what a resume!
        how quickly people forget that Postol had just come off beating mathysse into submission after mathysse was coming off one of his bigger wins vs provodnikov. I remember everyone saying how Danny Garcia moved up to 147 in order to avoid Postol but once Crawford schooled him, he was never that good. Is there anyone in Crawfords weight classes that you think he should've fought but didn't?

        Comment

        • MisanthropicNY
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2014
          • 7680
          • 288
          • 6
          • 37,612

          #14
          Originally posted by harwri008
          If Garcia is willing to fight Cotto at 154 then 147 shouldn't be a problem. If it is, then it would be a problem.
          Why are you taking sides lol? I'm guessing racial bias?

          Comment

          • HarvardBlue
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2011
            • 6762
            • 224
            • 128
            • 41,455

            #15
            Originally posted by MisanthropicNY
            Why are you taking sides lol? I'm guessing racial bias?
            I'm actually a bigger fan of Garcia than Crawford. It's a funny thing I like to do called being fair.

            Comment

            • JakeTheBoxer
              undisputed champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2014
              • 21141
              • 4,630
              • 2,798
              • 123,960

              #16
              No, it should be at 140.

              If you have balls for 147, than fight a real 147 fighter.

              Comment

              • jjsmyth87
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2014
                • 2741
                • 95
                • 4
                • 10,723

                #17
                Originally posted by MisanthropicNY
                I'm still wondering why nobody points out that Crawford has one of the weakest resumes of the so-called "lb for lb top 10"...

                Crawford beat a chinny blown featherweight who just lost again and Postol... Wow, what a resume!
                Nobody points that out because of the fact hes cleaned out both the 135 and 140 lb divisions. Not just cleaned them out but completely dominated them, its not his fault that those arent the strongest divisions. I wonder why you dont think hes earned his spot? Could it be racial bias? Lmao

                Comment

                • HURTFEELINGS
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 2741
                  • 143
                  • 34
                  • 18,198

                  #18
                  This is the next BIG fight in boxing, but if both are moving up, WHY would they both go down in weight and fight?

                  Comment

                  • Raggamuffin
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2016
                    • 8208
                    • 456
                    • 964
                    • 43,263

                    #19
                    Originally posted by MisanthropicNY
                    I'm still wondering why nobody points out that Crawford has one of the weakest resumes of the so-called "lb for lb top 10"...

                    Crawford beat a chinny blown featherweight who just lost again and Postol... Wow, what a resume!
                    And who has Garcia beaten, Salido? That chinny featherweight beat him too, and better, AND Gamboa wasn't accused of quitting.

                    Comment

                    • HURTFEELINGS
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Feb 2015
                      • 2741
                      • 143
                      • 34
                      • 18,198

                      #20
                      Originally posted by jjsmyth87
                      Nobody points that out because of the fact hes cleaned out both the 135 and 140 lb divisions. Not just cleaned them out but completely dominated them, its not his fault that those arent the strongest divisions. I wonder why you dont think hes earned his spot? Could it be racial bias? Lmao
                      Mysanthropic was a very respected poster, but lately he's been blowing that "dogwhistle" But who know maybe he will eventually put down his tiki torch and join the rest of us and be "boxing fans" again

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP