Comments Thread For: Luis Ortiz Fires Back at Wilder: Don't Get Caught With Weed Again!

[vitali1999]

I've said it before, Ortiz just needs to the right opponent to get the exposure he needs. His shots are straighter and more precise than the telegraphing Wilder. I feel Wilder is tailor made for him in that he'll run more than return fire which I expect will hurt his credibility even more. If Ortiz loses, he's supposed to lose. The pressure is not on Ortiz...

This is true

[Cheek busting]

Lol wtf?? Steroids vs weed?

**** outta here u fat old bum..

Wilder is a stick bum with chicken legs - just like paul williams he is a hilariously awkward KO just waiting to happen.

All these dudes with stick legs are..

Bum vs bum here.

[removed]

Ortiz is old, but he'll still have far too much skill for a bum like Wilder.

[rudy]

Ortiz has a pretty good point there...

Talking for an excuse before the fight even started, Oritz is hype because he is cuban, he is old and desperate for money. He will be stopped mark my words Wilder is not the best but has enough to deal with a hype job.

[PunchyPotorff]

Quote:
Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
Getting popped for weed in Dumb-As-A-Rock backwoods Alabama a week before the fight would likely cause the fight to be cancelled. Not to mention it's banned just like peds.

Banned or not. They are NOT comparable. One is a recreational drug while the other will not only give you the edge in the fight it can cause death to your opponent. Let's be real

I was just being real. Conversely, you're just trying to push your agenda. This article is about not doing something that gets the fight cancelled. Yours is a different argument entirely. Try to keep up.

[PunchyPotorff]

Quote:
Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
Isn't weed still cause to get banned too? So IOW, wouldn't make any difference really. Both would get a fighter banned. Both would nullify the fight results. Right? I mean, if you're gonna be strict on rules are rules are rules, then what's the difference? Both = banned.

Perhaps, but you've got to admit, PEDs are wayyyyyyy worse than getting popped with weed.
Just about everything about it looks worse in every possible way.

Could be, but that's another argument entirely. This article is about not doing something that gets the fight cancelled.

[Lopez_Boxing]

Quote:
Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
Getting popped for weed in Dumb-As-A-Rock backwoods Alabama a week before the fight would likely cause the fight to be cancelled. Not to mention it's banned just like peds.



I was just being real. Conversely, you're just trying to push your agenda. This article is about not doing something that gets the fight cancelled. Yours is a different argument entirely. Try to keep up.

I think most you guys just learned the word "agenda" and feel smart by saying it. It's used way to often. Do tell, what agenda am I trying to push? I had no argument. When you get popped for steroids you sound silly to me to bring up someone and marijuana for any reason. No argument just my opinion. Try to keep up and stay off my comments if you can't clown.

[CubanGuyNYC]

Seems to me, Punchy is right. I think we can all agree PEDs are worse than weed, but that's not the point. The point is not doing something that'll get the fight cancelled. And, like it or not, marijuana is a banned substance.

[Dle]

Drugs not the point here. Both guys are smart enough. But the mind war here is the issue. Seems like Ortiz can be a bit feisty. He's undefeated & we seen him on his toes boxing, when necessary. Gentlemen, we have a legit fight here.

[JRB123]

Ortiz wins the verbal warning here. That part about the injury and the weed was funny because Ortiz got him back on both points.

Plus add the fact that Wilder fought Chris Arreola after Chris got caught with weed in his system himself.