Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: UKAD Responds To Tyson Fury Over Claims on Delaying Ruling

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: UKAD Responds To Tyson Fury Over Claims on Delaying Ruling

    UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) has denied Tyson Fury's claim that it is to blame for the long delay in the case against him and his cousin Hughie Fury. The heavyweight duo were charged in June 2016 after they tested positive for a banned substance. Hughie Fury has continued to box and will fight New Zealand's Joseph Parker for the WBO title in Manchester on Saturday but Tyson Fury has not fought since his famous win over Wladimir Klitschko nearly two years ago.
    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Ok wait, if he's clean why is he asking for them to exclude evidence.

    Comment


    • #3
      So Hughie Fury has still not been cleared by UKAD or has officially served any suspension if he was found guilty.

      From the evidence and delay it seems both Hughie and Tyson will be found guilty which is why they're taking so long to make sure once they announce that verdict, its air tight and no chance of them being sued.

      This makes Hughie's fight against Joseph Parker on saturday almost meaningless as if he wins, he will be suspended a month or so later and stripped of his title.

      CRAZY!!!
      Last edited by Boxnation fan; 09-20-2017, 01:58 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        "exclude certain evidence"

        Comment


        • #5
          This whole thing is bogus. They had trace amounts of a substance absorbed through a nutrition product. Tyson talked about the Zionist and you can see what's happening now. Hugie doesn't talk so they left him alone because there is nothing on either of them. The coke use is what they are using to keep Tyson out of the scene.

          Comment


          • #6
            Do come admit your was banned for life. Sht these commissions think WAY to highly of themselves with NO check or balances. I mean S HT the Nevada tried banning that UFC fighter for 5 years for weed. AND the BI@TCH originally wanted him banned for LIFE for "Disrepsecting" her...

            Coke, weed banned for your entire career, I get it. PED's, loading gloves??? REAL cheating... slap on wrist

            Comment


            • #7
              Peteros spot on fury dared to mention the elitist/secretive shadow government that permeates every aspect of our lives and now he is being punished "they" don't like mainstream attention and or spotlight

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by turnedup View Post
                Ok wait, if he's clean why is he asking for them to exclude evidence.
                Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                "exclude certain evidence"
                A generous interpretation might be that he wants them to exclude the ******* bust? That seems to be why he can't fight while Hughie can

                Comment


                • #9
                  I wonder what it is Hughie and Tyson are instructing their law team to have excluded ? The very fact both stable mates have been popped is proof enough for me, UKAD must know Klitschko is waiting in the wings to sue them for, these guys must be making sure they're own backs are covered and it's Team Fury who will in fact be pursued through the courts.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    This is very simple. Fury pissed off just about everybody he could when he was champ for a couple of months, now they are paying him back hahahah. he talked about gays, ***ish people, women, you name it. This is his punishment for that I am sure of it. The fact that Hughie is able to fight confirms it for me.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP