Comments Thread For: Donaire Had Flashbacks Over Canelo-Golovkin Scoring By Byrd

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Donaire Had Flashbacks Over Canelo-Golovkin Scoring By Byrd

    Former four-division champion Nonito Donaire had a bout of deja vu when the scorecards came down last Saturday night, for the twelve round split draw between Canelo Alvarez and Gennady Golovkin at T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas. While the fight was very entertaining, the majority of the post-fight focus has completely centered on the scorecard submitted by judge Adelaide Byrd, who had it 118-110 in favor of Canelo.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • doom_specialist
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2006
    • 1722
    • 120
    • 195
    • 27,396

    #2
    I feel like a good course of action would be to demote judges, until they show enough consistency to get opportunities at judging title fights. At least if some judges are corrupt, they'll only see one payday every few years.

    Comment

    • Travycat
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2015
      • 2289
      • 73
      • 0
      • 9,892

      #3
      The NSAC director said they still support her even though she had a "bad night", which makes him look like he's on the take, too.

      Comment

      • Pinoy4ever
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2011
        • 1962
        • 36
        • 0
        • 18,183

        #4
        Adelaide Byrd is laughing all the way to the bank.... She won that fight!!!

        Comment

        • Boxing Logic
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2016
          • 4049
          • 442
          • 65
          • 59,061

          #5
          Originally posted by doom_specialist
          I feel like a good course of action would be to demote judges, until they show enough consistency to get opportunities at judging title fights. At least if some judges are corrupt, they'll only see one payday every few years.
          If the goal was good judging, that's what they'd do, but you have to understand the refs and judges get assignments based on how well they do what their boss tells them to do. Robert Byrd fixed the fight for the home team in Kovalev-Ward II, so they rewarded him by letting him ref Mayweather-Mcgregor, and letting his wife judge Canelo-GGG. Kenny Bayless always gets the most assignments because he protected Mayweather all those years, and always let him hold and use forearms and everything else.

          On the flipside, guess who was iced for years? Tony Weeks, because he let Maidana get too physical with Floyd in Floyd-Maidana I. Because of that, they gave him no big assignments for years, until a fight came along where it was actually in the interest of the home team to have a hands off ref who let anything go. So they finally gave him another big fight, Ward-Kovalev I, where they wanted him to let all the wrestling go. This time, he did exactly like they wanted, so they quickly gave him another assignment this time as reward, I forget the fight but it was a recent one.

          That's how it works. You don't just not get "benched" for bad scores or reffing, you get rewarded. They want you to do that. Byrd just went too far this time is all. Maybe someone got their wires crossed. Who knows. But there is a clear pattern where the refs who are fair, and don't help the house fighter, get benched, while the ones who are corrupt, and help the house fighter, are constantly rewarded.

          Comment

          • Arg_Tincho
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Nov 2016
            • 171
            • 11
            • 0
            • 6,449

            #6
            Originally posted by Boxing Logic
            If the goal was good judging, that's what they'd do, but you have to understand the refs and judges get assignments based on how well they do what their boss tells them to do. Robert Byrd fixed the fight for the home team in Kovalev-Ward II, so they rewarded him by letting him ref Mayweather-Mcgregor, and letting his wife judge Canelo-GGG. Kenny Bayless always gets the most assignments because he protected Mayweather all those years, and always let him hold and use forearms and everything else.

            On the flipside, guess who was iced for years? Tony Weeks, because he let Maidana get too physical with Floyd in Floyd-Maidana I. Because of that, they gave him no big assignments for years, until a fight came along where it was actually in the interest of the home team to have a hands off ref who let anything go. So they finally gave him another big fight, Ward-Kovalev I, where they wanted him to let all the wrestling go. This time, he did exactly like they wanted, so they quickly gave him another assignment this time as reward, I forget the fight but it was a recent one.

            That's how it works. You don't just not get "benched" for bad scores or reffing, you get rewarded. They want you to do that. Byrd just went too far this time is all. Maybe someone got their wires crossed. Who knows. But there is a clear pattern where the refs who are fair, and don't help the house fighter, get benched, while the ones who are corrupt, and help the house fighter, are constantly rewarded.
            How do i give points in this site?

            Comment

            • BrometheusBob.
              All Time Great
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2015
              • 20460
              • 916
              • 1,917
              • 156,555

              #7
              The difference in that case was that Magdaleno whooped Donaire easily. No way in hell did Donaire win that fight, I don't wanna hear that at all.

              Comment

              • komandante
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2008
                • 3579
                • 184
                • 14
                • 24,294

                #8
                NSAC's Adelaide Byrd should not be allowed or at least suspended for judging in "peeleft:

                Comment

                • Thraxox
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Sep 2016
                  • 9363
                  • 339
                  • 56
                  • 112,604

                  #9
                  Originally posted by BrometheusBob.
                  The difference in that case was that Magdaleno whooped Donaire easily. No way in hell did Donaire win that fight, I don't wanna hear that at all.
                  I gave it to 7-5 Magdaleno. Donaire was a shadow of his former self in that fight.

                  Comment

                  • Liondw
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 5996
                    • 1,873
                    • 34
                    • 23,904

                    #10
                    No problem with a scorecard for Canelo, edged it with sweet science, sometimes not that sweet. But yeah, wasn't ten rnds to two, no way. Six or seven to five, can see that. Subjective scoring sport, commentary, bias, which style you prefer can all influence who you saw winning.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP