Comments Thread For: Parker vs. Fury - Terry O'Connor Replaced As Referee

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • b d w
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Feb 2011
    • 572
    • 31
    • 4
    • 8,280

    #31
    Originally posted by keith_head
    I think Parker's team just wanted to draw media attention to it, so that any foul play will get the spotlight.
    Does your promoter need to turn up drunk at the press conference to achieve that though?

    Comment

    • paulf
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 23701
      • 3,325
      • 2,094
      • 1,052,140

      #32
      Parker should pull out of the fight.... and fire his whole team.

      Theyre having a guy too biased to ref JUDGE the fight?

      FFS......

      Comment

      • PunchyPotorff
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2012
        • 10384
        • 525
        • 1,304
        • 49,687

        #33
        Not much, but at least a tiny bit of improvement. Now watch, if Fury makes it 12, O'Connor will have already turned in a 12-0 card in Fury's favor. At this stage, if I had a fighter climbing the rankings or a reigning champ, no way would I allow him to fight in the UK.

        Comment

        • jackkeane6
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jun 2017
          • 225
          • 49
          • 109
          • 8,389

          #34
          Terry O'Connor is Peter Furys cousin. Watch the IFL video of Higgins going into the press conference on YouTube

          Comment

          • Deus
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2017
            • 1329
            • 56
            • 29
            • 18,075

            #35
            Originally posted by PunchyPotorff
            Not much, but at least a tiny bit of improvement. Now watch, if Fury makes it 12, O'Connor will have already turned in a 12-0 card in Fury's favor. At this stage, if I had a fighter climbing the rankings or a reigning champ, no way would I allow him to fight in the UK.
            Not sure that will be the case considering the furor there has been surrounding all this. You'd presume there will be a lot of scrutiny of the judging for this fight an thus any clear bias simply won't be tolerated.

            Comment

            • PunchyPotorff
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2012
              • 10384
              • 525
              • 1,304
              • 49,687

              #36
              Quote:
              Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
              Not much, but at least a tiny bit of improvement. Now watch, if Fury makes it 12, O'Connor will have already turned in a 12-0 card in Fury's favor. At this stage, if I had a fighter climbing the rankings or a reigning champ, no way would I allow him to fight in the UK.

              Originally posted by Deus
              Not sure that will be the case considering the furor there has been surrounding all this. You'd presume there will be a lot of scrutiny of the judging for this fight an thus any clear bias simply won't be tolerated.
              You'd think, but I have doubts.

              Comment

              • KillaCamNZ
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2016
                • 3967
                • 200
                • 156
                • 29,082

                #37
                Originally posted by TheBigLug
                Was the problem because he's British? or because he's Terry O'Connor? I've not really been following it.

                I don't see a problem with it if it's just because he's British. If you go fight in USA against an American, you will generally get an American ref and judges, so what's the difference?
                It's a bit of both.

                And regarding your second point - you're right. But that doesn't make it okay. Half of the issue here is that way these things operate is pretty bull**** to begin with.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP