Jacobs beat triple L

[Metho_4u]

Both had similar amount of visible facial damage but in the fight itself, Golovkin's punches were effecting Canelo Alvarez more (snapping his head back more frequently, forcing his entire body backwards for over 50% of practically every round and etc.)

So even if both Canelo and Golovkin are equal in the visible facial damage department, Golovkin was still more effective with his punches in other ways as I've already mentioned.

No, they didn't have even close to the same damage....golovkin was beat the **** up.

[Mr Objecitivity]

No, they didn't have even close to the same damage....golovkin was beat the **** up.

yes, they did. Golovkin beat up Canelo Alvarez, at the very least as much, if not more than vice versa.

Anyway, visible damage is only one out of many (4) other methods at the very least to determine punch effectiveness.

[Metho_4u]

yes, they did. Golovkin beat up Canelo Alvarez, at the very least as much, if not more than vice versa.

Anyway, visible damage is only one out of many (4) other methods at the very least to determine punch effectiveness.

You need to look at some actual pictures then, Canelo wasn't nearly as marked up as golovkin. Bet he looked nice the next day.

[hugh grant]

Floyd lost Castillo. Bradlety lost to PAC in first fight. Ward lost to kov.
But that was in past so why keep going on about Jacobs loss to GGG?

[FinitoxDinamita]

Jacobs would beat the dogsht out of Canelo like a mexican chiuaha.

Jacobs is much trickier and canelo cant deal with that. Too much range, speed, and power for canelo.

[Mr Objecitivity]

You need to look at some actual pictures then, Canelo wasn't nearly as marked up as golovkin. Bet he looked nice the next day.

I have and what I deduced from them is that both damaged each other enough to suggest both landed effective punches. They simply had different types of damage. One had red marks. The other had actual bumps.

Again, facial damage isn't the ONLY method to determine effectiveness of punches.

[redmyth79]

How come they didn't make much of that all this crying by triple L is getting ridiculous just man up and be happy u didn't get a L as a decision.so Jacobs should be crying the same way triple L is?

Well said. I rewatched that fight and gave a close decision to Jacobs.

[redmyth79]

Golovkins face looked worse than Canelo Saturday...so Canelo won then too???

XD

I finnggg love that post. Lmao. Well said. Canelo did win in my opinion though. I first scored it a draw rewatched and Canelo really Floyd his azz imo.

[Metho_4u]

Floyd lost Castillo. Bradlety lost to PAC in first fight. Ward lost to kov.
But that was in past so why keep going on about Jacobs loss to GGG?

Here we go with biased posters ignoring the facts...

FACT Floyd beat Castillo...check thed record
FACT Bradley beat manny...check the record
FACT Saturdays fight was a draw, check the record.

Denial and delusional fuggin fanboys all butthurt.

[Metho_4u]

I have and what I deduced from them is that both damaged each other enough to suggest both landed effective punches. They simply had different types of damage. One had red marks. The other had actual bumps.

Again, facial damage isn't the ONLY method to determine effectiveness of punches.

No it's not, but which one do you think was p1ssing more blood? That's the damage that goes unnoticed too often.