Comments Thread For: Gennady Golovkin's Promoter on The Canelo Rematch Clause

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ake-Dawg
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2016
    • 5510
    • 127
    • 80
    • 76,361

    #11
    Originally posted by Lemonhead_Jeff
    Amazing how your options increase when you've been showing the signs of decline. Golovkin better cash-in, because the curtain is coming down. He's not going to be favored to dominate those opponents like he would have been in the past.
    Umm the only option he truly has is Jacobs and Charlo. He is at the mercy of Cotto, Alvarez, and Saunders.

    Is it decline or just better quality of opponents? Sanchez says it's the latter.

    Comment

    • chargerhemi06
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2010
      • 1364
      • 58
      • 0
      • 12,644

      #12
      Ggg better hook up with memo to make these cherry pickers think twice about calling him out.

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #13
        Originally posted by Slyboots
        Tom claims that the rematch will be bigger due to the controversy of the first fight. I'm not sure I agree with that statement.

        Wasn't the case with Pac-Bradley or Ward-Kovalev.

        Have there been any examples where a rematch due to controversy was more lucrative than the first fight?
        Tarver-Jones
        Pacquiao-Marquez
        Mayweather-Maidana

        Comment

        • rasdun
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 1843
          • 48
          • 95
          • 8,765

          #14
          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
          Tarver-Jones
          Pacquiao-Marquez
          Mayweather-Maidana
          those were all close fight, not really bad decisions like Pacquiao vs Bradley

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #15
            Originally posted by rasdun
            those were all close fight, not really bad decisions like Pacquiao vs Bradley
            Canelo-Golovkin was a close fight with 1 bad card, not like Pacquiao-Bradley.

            Comment

            • TheCell8
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2016
              • 5551
              • 353
              • 44
              • 38,715

              #16
              Interesting to see what happens here... If they decide to got the Cotto route, and then fight Canelo, they're not going to be able to unify the division, which what their goal was or they claimed it was. Because Derevyachenko is an IBF mandatory and they're going force the mandatory fight likely next year. Then Charlo is a WBC mandatory, although I don't think that matters that much because the WBC doesn't enforce mandatory like IBF.

              But they've got a tough choice here. Do they go for the money fight with Cotto and risk losing one of the belts, Or do they got after Saunders and unify in December?

              Comment

              • Lemonhead_Jeff
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2013
                • 1636
                • 113
                • 17
                • 18,096

                #17
                Originally posted by Ake-Dawg
                Umm the only option he truly has is Jacobs and Charlo. He is at the mercy of Cotto, Alvarez, and Saunders.

                Is it decline or just better quality of opponents? Sanchez says it's the latter.
                You're right, and at 35, it's a little of both.

                Comment

                • boxingitis
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 7075
                  • 2,042
                  • 18
                  • 23,227

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Clubber Pac
                  Don't be foolish, none of those other options are lucrative. Cotto perhaps, but thats a cherry pick, a BS fight. GGG has NO options to make money outside of Canelo. Canelo meanwhile? He has a laundry list of options, and only ONE of them is GGG
                  Like when he sold 250 K PPV vs Liam Smith. They both have the same options. Canelo just makes more money on PPV because of the Mexican population in the US.

                  Comment

                  • FinitoxDinamita
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Sep 2016
                    • 16112
                    • 2,217
                    • 2,187
                    • 281,604

                    #19
                    One would have to be naive to think that a rematch would happen this december. Canelo isnt fighting till next May and GG might not fight again this year either.

                    Im not looking forward to a rematch.

                    Comment

                    • thack
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 12891
                      • 2,937
                      • 1,340
                      • 53,931

                      #20
                      Lol...don't even think about it ........Cotto just retire!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP