Comments Thread For: Gennady Golovkin's Promoter on The Canelo Rematch Clause
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Tarver-JonesTom claims that the rematch will be bigger due to the controversy of the first fight. I'm not sure I agree with that statement.
Wasn't the case with Pac-Bradley or Ward-Kovalev.
Have there been any examples where a rematch due to controversy was more lucrative than the first fight?
Pacquiao-Marquez
Mayweather-MaidanaComment
-
Comment
-
Interesting to see what happens here... If they decide to got the Cotto route, and then fight Canelo, they're not going to be able to unify the division, which what their goal was or they claimed it was. Because Derevyachenko is an IBF mandatory and they're going force the mandatory fight likely next year. Then Charlo is a WBC mandatory, although I don't think that matters that much because the WBC doesn't enforce mandatory like IBF.
But they've got a tough choice here. Do they go for the money fight with Cotto and risk losing one of the belts, Or do they got after Saunders and unify in December?Comment
-
Comment
-
Like when he sold 250 K PPV vs Liam Smith. They both have the same options. Canelo just makes more money on PPV because of the Mexican population in the US.Comment
-
One would have to be naive to think that a rematch would happen this december. Canelo isnt fighting till next May and GG might not fight again this year either.
Im not looking forward to a rematch.Comment
Comment