Comments Thread For: NSAC Head: No Corruption, Byrd Feels Terrible Over Canelo-GGG

[AndyShitHot]

Why does she feel bad? If she feels that she judged it honestly then stand by your convictions. The problem is that no unbiased person could have possibly judged the fight 118-110 to Canelo.

[MisanthropicNY]

This is pathetic. She's being bullied for no reason. Good Lord.

All to protect non boxing GGG? Hilarious.

White Knight Mangina Cuck to the rescue! Now she's the victim lol... It's Maginas like this that have helped Femi****s ruin society through forced diversity...

This is a Boxing forum... go to take your Victim Card to some Social Justice Warrior cause...

[bluemax]

LOL! No corrupt decisions in Nevada. ROLF!!!! I'm shocked that they would say that!!! Liars lying who would of thought. Guess all those shady decisions were the controlling promoters fighter happened to always pull out the win are all coincidences... Sit back and watch a few of the Canelo fights held in Vegas and explain the scoring. Competitive fights are not competitive on the scorecards. Heck ! one judge had Canelo drawing with Mayweather, see a pattern here

[Citizen Koba]

No corruption, more likely incompetence or the individual judge showing favoritism on her own. If it was corruption it would be easy to prove, because there would be a paper trail or other evidence. No evidence has been brought forth because there is none.

If this woman was paid off then any journalist with half a brain could prove it. A money transfer, the judge buying something outside her income level, etc.

The problem with boxing judges is their ages. I recall many of these judges judging fights in the 1980s. These judges are past their primes and as they age they get worse.

I've read some **** about this kinda stuff and I think in the main there's nothing so crass as meetings in unlit parking lots and envelopes changing hands... just a hint dropped here and there and the knowledge that the event invitations and judging gigs will dry up if the right result doesn't materialise.

[Bossman15]

The sad is that Golovkin is slowly on decline and could not produce a knockout too and he did lose but not by that wide margin I ordered and DVR it so I can sit on it again Canelo did land clean punches that frustrated Golovkin but

[hitking]

The sad is that Golovkin is slowly on decline and could not produce a knockout too and he did lose but not by that wide margin I ordered and DVR it so I can sit on it again Canelo did land clean punches that frustrated Golovkin

I've rewatched it once. And I scored it 6-5-1 for Canelo. The fight shouldn't have been 10-2 either way. But even the rounds GGG won, Canelo was landing the better shots.

[Cinci Champ]

im not saying there is no corruption i just dont think its how people picture it happening. with this though I think were just dealing with an incompetent judge point blank period I honestly dont think its anything more then that. One thing though is ever since Golden Boy Promotions have been around all their big big events have some of the most questionable scoring in favor of whoever their money man is all the way back to Oscar getting a favorable card against Mayweather. GBP has got to be the worst when it comes to bad scoring in favor of GBP for whatever reason.

Its died down lately with PBC popping up and TR having their own questionable decisions etc but lets not so easily forget that GBP was and still is infamous for bad scoring in their favor.

[Cinci Champ]

Another thing I will say is this is why boxing going mainstream is so good. We may never have complete oversight in boxing but when people like ESPN, Fox News etc put judges on blast by name for horrible decisions thats about as good as it gets for getting better decisions. Were so used to screaming robbery for any debatable fight these days but the ones that are truly bad when the world is paying attention really helps.

Now that ESPN is getting into boxing in a real way with this fight and the Pac Horn fight tho I personally think both fights were way closer then the majority think its still good espn is making a big deal out of the decisions and I think they will continue to make strides in this way as long as their in boxing.

My only worry is now it feels like every time there is a close debatable fight we all scream robbery. We no longer can have a close fight without people screaming robbery. It used to be decisions were debated now any controversial decision is automatically a "robbery" and my worry is it gets a lot of attention so they may run with it. Its a double edged sword no doubt but now that fans are basically saying enough is enough and even bashing decisions when their fighter is the beneficiary only good can come from it

[Southpawology]

Suspend that dizzy broad indefinitely! Back to the kitchen Ms Byrd

[WesternChamp]

No she doesn't and neither do you. If you felt sorry at all, she would be fired today, but she wasn't because you really don't give a schit. Now stop lying and GTFO!

boxing fans really need to take a stand. not just for bad judges, but also bad promoter's keeping fighters away from each other, etc. can we as boxing fans, just not a buy fight if we know its a mismatch or a money grab fight? i mean, how hard is it to not buy a fight for just this one time? everyone complaining but these are the same people putting money in these guys pocket for them to continue doing this.