Does GGG have to accept rematch?

[Papa Smurf]

GGG fans are scared and want him to knockout Blow Job Saunders because he can't knock out top fighters

[FinitoxDinamita]

No id rather see GG against the likes of Saunders and Charlo.

[OctoberRed]

If the draw triggers a rematch clause, like Golden Boy claims, then he likely would be bound to face Canelo again

[Mic Tyson]

Why are Golovkin fans so scared of a rematch?

They'd rather see BJS than a Canelo rematch?

Someone please explain this to me. My best guess is they want to go back to scoring easy KO victories.

We are not scared. I just see no reason that is going to be beneficial to GGG. He already was robbed and will be agqin to a bigger extent next time. Canelo needs the rematch more than GGG does if you ask me. Don't give it to him. Guy and his promoter are ****ing turde

[Chrismart]

I don't think so, im not sure? I'd assumed it was a rematch clause that kicked in if GGG had beaten him. So now, there's no need for the clause.

Off topic, but for some reason this thread reminded me off when Don King sorted out the Benn-Eubank rematch. In the contract it stated that the winner and loser would have to join him.
But it ended a draw and they both walked away from the deal. That was a weird one

[Shape up]

Why wouldn't he, the heat is on canelo, not ggg as 90% of people thought he won, canelo already has not committed to a rematch an article said yesterday, ggg doesn't have a rematch clause

[Chrismart]

If the draw triggers a rematch clause, like Golden Boy claims, then he likely would be bound to face Canelo again

Ah right, so the clause supposedly covers a draw also. Cheers for the info :ANYWORD:

[Diego Rodriguez]

Why are Golovkin fans so scared of a rematch?

They'd rather see BJS than a Canelo rematch?

Someone please explain this to me. My best guess is they want to go back to scoring easy KO victories.

Personally speaking, as a boxing fan sure I'd love to see them do it again. It was a heck of a fight. Golovkin won but it wasn't a blow out. It was a highly competitive. Canelo loses and he then has to say well that didn't work exactly how I wanted it to and he has to adjust his game. Now maybe he is more aggressive and we have an even more exciting second fight.

As a Golovkin fan though I'm thinking, if Golovkin has to fight even better than that and Canelo can do the same or even slightly better they are going to give him the fight than the deck is incredibly stacked. I don't want to see no BS happen twice.

In one judges eyes Canelo literally could have been knocked down multiple times and still have got a draw (think about that). There will be another judge like her, if not so blatant, on the next card. Unless they do some kind of independent commission which I highly doubt.

I need a little time to think about it but right now if Golovkin said f it I'm going to fight BJS for that last title and then I'm fighting Jacobs (or heck even Charlo) I'd say I'm totally fine with it. Some of those guys might be as tough or tougher fighters than Canelo for Golovkin and far less money so it isn't about being scared of a rematch. It is being scared of fighting your ass off and then getting screwed because of political BS.

In the end if Canelo wants to fight Golovkin will be there I think. Too much money. They'll fight in Vegas you know it. Whether it happens in May like it should or September IDK.

[Diego Rodriguez]

GGG fans are scared and want him to knockout Blow Job Saunders because he can't knock out top fighters

I'd like to see him fight BJS regardless to try and unify the titles. Might as well do it before Canelo fight since there is a high chance against Canelo he'll get screwed again.

[Jsmooth9876]

Canelo doesn't seem to be eager to run it back in May so why not GGG vs Cotto and Canelo vs BJS. Winners meet for the unification in September. GGG gets a nice payday and Canelo faces another legit Middleweight