Ah!, I forgot, I'd have sworn that it was provodnikov the one fighting the las rounds yesterday. Gg went full provod, it was pitiful to witness. Gg, doesnt belong to the same ring as hagler, monzón, or hearns, not any single day of his life. A good fighter? sure, yes. But not an atg, never.
So GGG is a one dimensional brawler/slugger who also has very little power confirmed
Collapse
-
GGG has VERY good power.
He stopped like 20 guys in a row before jacobs. Jacobs had the right style match up against GGG. He had good reach and boxed from the outside. GGG isnt a counter puncher so when jacobs was throwing, it stopped GGG from throwing and then after Jacobs threw his combos then GGG steps forward for his. Kept GGG at bay for a lot of the fight.
Canelo has excellent defense and prevented GGG from landing clean all night, Slipped a ton of shots and blocked a ton more. He didnt stand there toe to toe in the center until late in the fight when he had no energy. He was moving for a reason in the early rounds.
Funniest guy to ever comment on GGG's power was Brook with the "GGG never hurt me, he didnt punch that hard", GGG broke his ***ing eye socket, Brooks career will never be the same.
What good does it do you to say you took all his shots without going down like Margarito vs pac when your face was broken and your career is over after the fight and you still lost the fight...
How do you beat guys with big power? you beat them with a good defense and not taking their shots in the first place. Thats the smart way to do it.
I've been reading and hearing recently that not only does Golovkin lack punching power and that his power is overrated because of his lack of opposition, but he also lacks boxing skills and isn't a top level boxer.
So if that was the case where a boxer had very little punching power to KO opponents like Canelo Alvarez and also had very little boxing skills to match opponents like Canelo Alvarez in a boxing contest whilst also lacking power, then how an Earth could Golovkin be as competitive as he was against Canelo Alvarez in that fight? Surely, Golovkin should've been demolished like how Ricky Hatton was demolished by Manny Pacquiao in 2 rounds. Am I right?Comment
-
So according to you, Golovkin was boxing from the exact day he was born? So he was a boxer as a newborn baby?gg's footwork is sheet, even worse than canelo's. It really stunned me, I didnt expect that.
Gg was missing AALLL NIIIGHT LOOONG. I havent watched a figther missing so much since long long ago.
If there is anything that this fight has made clear, is that gg hasnt fought elite oposition not even a sinlge time before yesterday. Tomato after tomato... for 35 years.
So if Golovkin was that bad, then why haven't all those other better boxers fought against him and beat him?Comment
-
Gg has power, if someone says otherwise he should look for another sport.I've been reading and hearing recently that not only does Golovkin lack punching power and that his power is overrated because of his lack of opposition, but he also lacks boxing skills and isn't a top level boxer.
So if that was the case where a boxer had very little punching power to KO opponents like Canelo Alvarez and also had very little boxing skills to match opponents like Canelo Alvarez in a boxing contest whilst also lacking power, then how an Earth could Golovkin be as competitive as he was against Canelo Alvarez in that fight? Surely, Golovkin should've been demolished like how Ricky Hatton was demolished by Manny Pacquiao in 2 rounds. Am I right?
But the only reason, THE ONE AND ONLY, why gg was competitive yesterday was by sheer workrate. His footwork, talent and ring IQ, went through the window, they were exposed as F.Last edited by ray moe; 09-17-2017, 07:31 AM.Comment
-
Again, if Golovkin was that bad in terms of boxing abilities, then why couldn't Canelo Alvarez absolutely murder, demolish amd decapacitate Golovkin's body out of the ring? Are you reading that right? Golovkin is obviously that horrible according to you. Yet, the fight looked fairly competitive. Now why was that the case?Ah!, I forgot, I'd have sworn that it was provodnikov the one fighting the las rounds yesterday. Gg went full provod, it was pitiful to witness. Gg, doesnt belong to the same ring as hagler, monzón, or hearns, not any single day of his life. A good fighter? sure, yes. But not an atg, never.Comment
-
Which better boxers? bjs? rofl. It's not my fault, neither gg's fault, that MW is full of trash. Canelo, and even cotto, would clean the whole division without breaking a sweat, dude.Comment
-
So what if he was competitive? If he was that bad as a boxer, it shouldn't matter. He still shouldn't be in any competitive fights against any top level opponent like Canelo Alvarez. Top level opponents like Canelo Alvarez should beat someone as horrible as Golovkin are more easily, like how Manny Pacquiao demolished Ricky Hatton in 2 rounds.Comment
-
**** no, give the man his props. He fought a great fight with one of the p4p best fighters in the world. Why cant yall just give someone his props. Golovkin fought like a machine. Canelo has a granite chin, no one has ever been able to knock him down. And i thought the draw was a good decisionComment
-
I repeat, workrate. Canelo's workrate was sheet yesterday. He didnt come to the fight to work, he did the very minimum, he allowed gg to get out of the hook by sheer workrate, and he shouldnt have done that.Again, if Golovkin was that bad in terms of boxing abilities, then why couldn't Canelo Alvarez absolutely murder, demolish amd decapacitate Golovkin's body out of the ring? Are you reading that right? Golovkin is obviously that horrible according to you. Yet, the fight looked fairly competitive. Now why was that the case?Comment
-
So why haven't Cotto and Canelo cleaned out the middleweight division then? Talk is cheap and actions are rich. I can claim that my little baby son can clean out this and that division, but it's all talk.Comment
Comment