Recent judging by women: HORRIBLE

[Strategic1]

Women judges. CJ Ross, Waleska Roldan, Adelaide Byrd, Lisa Giampa

Horrible cards.
CJ Ross for Pac Bradley 1 and scoring Floyd-Canelo a draw.

Waleska scoring 117-111 for Horn

Byrd with 1118-110 for Canelo.

Lisa Giampa..scoring Lomachenko-Russell fight a draw.

Absurd. Women judges can't be trusted. They can't be fully logical. They will go sometimes with who they subconsciously would like to f#^k. OR who they prefer

There I said it

[Helm]

As judging a boxing match is inheritely subjective to a high degree, women should stay miles away from judging boxing match. they see the world through emotions and lack of objecting reasoning and logical thinking.

I think it should be a more objective way to judge boxing match, even using technology if that help. The scoring system is too subjective and approximative.

Or we could go back to old school 25 rounds boxing where you have a knockout every time and you clearly have a winner.

[iamboxing]

[iamboxing]

[iamboxing]

[Citizen Koba]

Women judges. CJ Ross, Waleska Roldan, Adalaide Byrd.

Horrible cards.
CJ Ross for Pac Bradley 1 and scoring Floyd-Canelo a draw.

Waleska scoring 117-111 for Horn

Byrd with 1118-110 for Canelo.

Absurd. Women judges can't be trusted. They can't be fully logical. They will go sometimes with who they subconsciously would like to f#^k. OR who they prefer

There I said it

My theory is somewhat more sophisticated and predicated on just the sort of prejudice your post illustrates. IMO women are just as capable and objective and can be just as honest (or corrupt) and unbiased (or not) as their male colleagues. However those seeking to influence the outcome of a major fight may prefer to use female judges to deliver the more absurd results exactly because male fans are more likely to blame it on female frivolity or lack of knowledge or objectivity than on corruption. Just my 2p.

[Evil_Meat]

Op probably never gets laid and hates women.

[NEETzsche]

Well, in the case of Byrd and Lederman at least they were clearly not hired for their credentials but because of their husbands. Boxing officialdom is just rife with cronyism and doesn't select for competence or integrity at all. At this point I'd be happy if every single referee and judge in the sport was given the sack and replaced with unaffiliated young blood. A clean slate

[////]

You forgot Lisa Giampa: Scored Lomachenko vs Russell Jr a draw

How she got her crony job: Wife of Chuck Giampa

[Strategic1]

My theory is somewhat more sophisticated and predicated on just the sort of prejudice your post illustrates. IMO women are just as capable and objective and can be just as honest (or corrupt) and unbiased (or not) as their male colleagues. However those seeking to influence the outcome of a major fight may prefer to use female judges to deliver the more absurd results exactly because male fans are more likely to blame it on female frivolity or lack of knowledge or objectivity than on corruption. Just my 2p.

I know what you are saying. And I believe in equality and being prejudiced is not good.

But there are very few women judges in the sport; now a pattern is starting to develop.

Yes, Byrd and Lederman have produced decent scorecards in the past ... But still better way to put it.. when a women judge is OFF , they tend to be way off.