Originally posted by Konstantin
Klitschko fans.
Collapse
-
-
You call Wladimir one dimensional and yet you describe Briggs as a "great fighter"? Briggs wouldn't last four rounds against Wlad.Comment
-
Originally posted by Born to WinI think he often appears to be sort of one-dimensional and only effective due to his size.Comment
-
Originally posted by Left2bodyI agree with your other points except for intellegence and technical skills. James Toney is an extremely sound fighter in terms of ring generalship and knowledge. He is also a very smart fighter.
James Toney in shape has a good shot against most heavy weights even though he should'nt even be in the division with is height and lack of power. But matched up against Klitch and I think Toney would lose, but not because Klitch is more intellegent or more technical.
But notice I said the heavyweight division. The only part of Toney that belongs in ther is his stomack. Toney has not been able to "Dominate" as he promissed, nor will he be able to. I just can't see him beat guys like Wlad, Lyakhovich, and Valuev is just too huge for him...
and all like you said - size disadvantage. Toney does not belong with the HWs.Comment
-
Originally posted by Born to WinKlitschko was down 11 times in his career.
1 Panell - lucky shot.
1 Puritty - lucky that Klitschko ran out of gas.
4 Sanders - lucky, probably one of the greatest hitters in history.
1 Brewster - lucky Klitscko ran out of gas.
1 Williamson - lucky, was only the balance.
3 Peter - lucky, illegal blows (Wlad's holding and turning around of course had nothing to do with it).
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!Comment
-
Originally posted by Born to WinHey guys,
I am still new around here, but I thought it was about time to start this thread, I would like to hear your honest views on this.
The topic is the Wladimir Klitschko fans.
He gets praised like the second coming. But he is very limited, in my opinion.
He lost to Ross Puritty, Corrie Sanders and Lamon Brewster fair and square. But the fans claim they were only lucky and would get brutalized in rematches. Then why on Earth doesn't Wlad rematch them? Let me take a guess: they are not worthy?!
Klitschko is good against hand-picked opponents like Castillo, Moli and Byrd - they are small and weak.
Klitschko was down 11 times in his career.
1 Panell - lucky shot.
1 Puritty - lucky that Klitschko ran out of gas.
4 Sanders - lucky, probably one of the greatest hitters in history.
1 Brewster - lucky Klitscko ran out of gas.
1 Williamson - lucky, was only the balance.
3 Peter - lucky, illegal blows (Wlad's holding and turning around of course had nothing to do with it).
I am not trying to be disrespectful. Klitschko is a good boxer and deserves to be champ now. But could YOU please calm down about him?Comment
-
Originally posted by Born to WinHey guys,
I am still new around here, but I thought it was about time to start this thread, I would like to hear your honest views on this.
The topic is the Wladimir Klitschko fans.
He gets praised like the second coming. But he is very limited, in my opinion.
He lost to Ross Puritty, Corrie Sanders and Lamon Brewster fair and square. But the fans claim they were only lucky and would get brutalized in rematches. Then why on Earth doesn't Wlad rematch them? Let me take a guess: they are not worthy?!
Klitschko is good against hand-picked opponents like Castillo, Moli and Byrd - they are small and weak.
Klitschko was down 11 times in his career.
1 Panell - lucky shot.
1 Puritty - lucky that Klitschko ran out of gas.
4 Sanders - lucky, probably one of the greatest hitters in history.
1 Brewster - lucky Klitscko ran out of gas.
1 Williamson - lucky, was only the balance.
3 Peter - lucky, illegal blows (Wlad's holding and turning around of course had nothing to do with it).
I am not trying to be disrespectful. Klitschko is a good boxer and deserves to be champ now. But could YOU please calm down about him?Comment
-
Originally posted by Kid AchillesYou call Wladimir one dimensional and yet you describe Briggs as a "great fighter"? Briggs wouldn't last four rounds against Wlad.
id actually like to see wlad fight briggs.. briggs is huge.. and wlad will finally meet someone his size if not bigger.. they both pack huge punches..Comment
Comment