Comments Thread For: Wilder-Ortiz, Jacobs, Lipinets Showtime Tripleheader in Play

[IMDAZED]

He'll then discredit the old Cuban.

It's already begun.

[juggernaut666]

Buddy...you said Wilder cancelled the fight. I asked you how he won a lawsuit if he is the reason the fight didn't happen. Also, both the WBC and the courts are on record as saying the fight didnt happen because Povetkin tested positive.

Neither Parker nor Wilder ever got in position to fight each other. Why? Mandos (Stiverne and Fury)

What's ******ed is you seem incapable of using facts or references. If you are gonna call someone's post BS...support it with something...like facts.

Wilder won bc the AMOUNT Wilder was getting paid to fight ,the U.S jury gave him more to the amount he filed with which has NOTHING to do with PEDS bc it was determined it was not proven with the ACTUAL VADA ppl he took it prior to the fight . Wilder team brought there OWN expert to claim he did take it . The trial was about MONEY not PEDS ,they only needed a reason as to WHY the fight was cancelled and that fell on Wilder which obviously he was going to win when a jury only needed 30 minutes to decide which was B.S when the amount was 14 x under the legal guidelines !

Really is this that difficult for you to understand ?

Ive already explained that WAYYYYYYYY back in Feb. that Stiverne became his MANDATORY and they were going to promote the fight by Parker stepping in the ring but he was told NOT too . Really why cant you comprehend this ? HAD Wilder took care of Stiverne it sets up Parker BEFORE H.Fury comes in the picture . GET IT ?

If you dont know whats going on in the ins and outs and cant decipher FACTS ( like your friends on here ) its bc your to busy cheerleading while deflecting Wilders faults , go back and READ my SIX lists (i stopped short ) on Wilder !

[Kigali]

It's already begun.

They are predictable as a morning piss.

[Randall Cunning]

They are predictable as a morning piss.

LOL, on the last page you said Ortiz "couldn't knock out a bum", "his legs are gone" and "hes old", who needs to discredit the win when Wilders fans do it for themselves

[juggernaut666]

LOL, on the last page you said Ortiz "couldn't knock out a bum", "his legs are gone" and "hes old", who needs to discredit the win when Wilders fans do it for themselves

These fanboys are total morons !

[Kigali]

LOL, on the last page you said Ortiz "couldn't knock out a bum", "his legs are gone" and "hes old", who needs to discredit the win when Wilders fans do it for themselves

I've been saying that long before this fight was announced.

[vitali1999]

What will you say if Wilder wins? That's the question I'm asking.

I will say my god he can actually beat somebody that isn't a bum. But will never beat Joshua

[j.razor]

Not since GGG beat him. You can't be a boogey man if you back up all night and get dropped.

Dude, your boy lost two fights in a row, Jacobs & Nelo.

[j.razor]

Dawg we both know that unifications trump mandatories, and the wbc is very ******* when enforcing their rules, and also likely GGG wants to duck Charlo because for all the "I'm a fighter, not a businessman" bullcrap he's been making very business minded decisions.

GGG will want to fight Saunders when he beats Canelo, and he'll get the rules allow him to do that.

Are you saying Charlo should stay inactive while GGG has a megafight with Canelo and a big unification fight with Saunders for the undisputed heavyweight crown?

Just think about. Charlo would benefit from fighting someone like Jacobs. If he beats him better than GGG, then he proves that he has acclimated to the weight and he gets the hype an momentum needed to corner the wbc and GGG into making the fight sooner rather than later.

The media and the fans will demand the fight and GGG will have nowhere to hide. But if Charlo sits on his ass while GGG gets Canelo and Saunders, don't be surprised if he gets screwed over and doesn't get his deserved mandatory shot, or GGG retires after unifying with Saunders.

The media and fans are powerful tools to get what you want. Sometimes the rules aren't enough because they can be bent and/or exceptions can be made. Charlo needs the Jacobs fight to get the media and fans to rally behind him.

But if GGG takes the Charlo fight immediately after Canelo then yes kudos to him and I will eagerly anticipate Charlo's victory. I'm a Charlo supporter believe it or not.

But for Charlo to get the big fight GGG needs to win, and win convincingly, by KO. If he wins by KO then I doubt there's a Canelo rematch.
If the fight is close then there will be a rematch, and then he will unify with Saunders and probably retire afterwards, and Charlo will be sitting on his ass with nothing to show.

That's what I don't want to happen.

Jacobs & Charlo are the best in the division so let's save the best for last.

[yankees7448]

Dude, your boy lost two fights in a row, Jacobs & Nelo.

Dude. My boy was in two close fights in a row.