Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo-Golovkin: Nevada Commission Approves Judges, Referee

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Mirko Troll Cop View Post

    Just some knowledge for you to know about the red hair gene and the elementary view that it's exclusively ''Irish.''
    Did anyone here say it was exclusively Irish ? The red-hair gene has been found in Neanderthals too. The gene just flourished more in Ireland/Scotland than anywhere else for reasons probably linked to a combination of climate and ***ual preference (if you want to go all Darwin on it). That combined with historical reasons why the Irish migrated a lot out of Ireland, including documented migrations of Irish groups into Mexico, and from there its all just probability.

    eg I've got an Irish name, and I can trace my ancestry back to about the mid 1700s (ie pre-famine), all of which lived in South-West England. I can only extrapolate that before that they descended from a particular trading arrangement with some Lord back in the day who was known to have profited from trade with Southern Ireland in the 1500s, which led to some migration back then. Can I prove it ? Nope. Just probabilities - its the most likely. Most of the time that's all we've got if we don't have documentary evidence.

    Anyway, its been fun, but back to boxing.......

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
      Your a f@cking sht talking Bi@tch and that's all you do is talk, talk , talk

      Tru That!

      I'll put $500 right now Canelo makes it past round 9. Since you have Canelo loseing in like 2 rounds this should be easy $$$ for u. But your a Bi@tch and just talks... Walk the walk then lil man
      You keep throwing out crap about betting. Are we going to bet your account that I won't be putting down money on Golovkin which you said I wouldn't. I noticed how you ran away from that conversation. Time to walk the walk lil' btch.

      I saw that Tru That was right down the middle on this fight and now you are attacking him. You are a douche bag dude. I have no problem with Canelo fans. I have respect for the man and will give him his props if he wins. You talk all this crap about Golovkin and his fans but you are as bad as they come for any fan base.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by j.razor View Post
        Nah, I had Danny up by two & Lara started off good then faded, I was rooting for Lara but I had nelo winning & I'm not a nelo fan.....
        I've yet to ever see a Jacobs person ever explain round by round how they gave that fight to Jacobs. I've yet to see a video dissecting how they came to that conclusion. So here's your chance, what rounds did you give Jacobs. I'm also curious how did Jacobs win by 2 points?

        If you gave Jacobs 8 rounds = 115 vs. 112 (assuming you scored all rounds 10/9 minus the round Golovkin got a KD so won 10/8)

        If you gave Jacobs 7 rounds = 114 vs. 113

        So how did you have Jacobs winning by 2 points?

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Diego Rodriguez View Post
          You keep throwing out crap about betting. Are we going to bet your account that I won't be putting down money on Golovkin which you said I wouldn't. I noticed how you ran away from that conversation. Time to walk the walk lil' btch.

          I saw that Tru That was right down the middle on this fight and now you are attacking him. You are a douche bag dude. I have no problem with Canelo fans. I have respect for the man and will give him his props if he wins. You talk all this crap about Golovkin and his fans but you are as bad as they come for any fan base.
          Why the heck would I bet my account your gonna put some $$$ on the fight??? I'm betting on the fight as well you dumb ***. You gonna put your sht account up also??

          I hope u talk sht about Canelo at the bar or Where ever your at to Mexicans and get your ass beat for being a dumb ***.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by j.razor View Post
            Nah, I had Danny up by two & Lara started off good then faded, I was rooting for Lara but I had nelo winning & I'm not a nelo fan.....
            Only reason why i wasn't mad Canelita "beat" Lara, was cause of Lara using way too much "ring generalship" and running.

            GGG was in there with a prime Jacobs, who is reported to have outweighed him, now we get to see GGG in there with someone who is probably smaller than Jacobs.

            It will be pot shot and move.. till the fans boo!

            Comment


            • #96
              Every fight in Vegas has bad judging period - hence, why casuals don't want to invest in fights with bizarre scores and outcomes.

              The fact that Alavarez v. Mayweather was even close on any scorecard is a disgrace, and having Canelo ahead of Amir at the time of the stoppage is laughable.

              Canelo clearly beat Running Lara - how the fk do you expect to win a fight by literally running and throwing no punches? If you thought Lara won, you're the reason boxing is a marginal sport.

              My prediction is that GGG will easily dominate Canelo and get robbed because neither guy will even score a knockdown in the fight, as both have good chins and boxing ability. GGG's jab will totally dominate Canelo...
              Last edited by MisanthropicNY; 09-11-2017, 05:27 PM.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Diego Rodriguez View Post
                I've yet to ever see a Jacobs person ever explain round by round how they gave that fight to Jacobs. I've yet to see a video dissecting how they came to that conclusion. So here's your chance, what rounds did you give Jacobs. I'm also curious how did Jacobs win by 2 points?

                If you gave Jacobs 8 rounds = 115 vs. 112 (assuming you scored all rounds 10/9 minus the round Golovkin got a KD so won 10/8)

                If you gave Jacobs 7 rounds = 114 vs. 113

                So how did you have Jacobs winning by 2 points?
                Why do you use a Hispanic name when you hate MexiCANS??

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by ox805er View Post
                  Only reason why i wasn't mad Canelita "beat" Lara, was cause of Lara using way too much "ring generalship" and running.

                  GGG was in there with a prime Jacobs, who is reported to have outweighed him, now we get to see GGG in there with someone who is probably smaller than Jacobs.

                  It will be pot shot and move.. till the fans boo!
                  Only people mad about Lara losing are the Internet Boxing-tards who think running is "ring generalship." Lara ran and barely threw anything - Canelo won every round in that fight... It's the Twilight Zone in boxing sometimes - delusional InterneTards who start Bromancing fighters. If you root for any fighter to the point where you lie about them winning a fight - you really need a father figure.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Bayless as referree. Well canelo now has zero chances of winning this fight. This ref favors ggg as he will always break the fight up everytime it goes to a clinch.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
                      Both are prime? One is a 35 year old pressure fighter. Nobody tops Ward with a victory here.
                      Canelo is a much better fighter than both frotch and kovalev.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP