Comments Thread For: Golovkin: If I KO'd Jacobs, I Would Not Be Getting Canelo Fight!

[HarvardBlue]

I'm picking Golovkin to beat Canelo but he need to stop repeating the BS. If he's not saying he carried Jacobs he's implying it by constantly bringing it up. It's not the first him or Sanchez said it. It does matter what led to the fight getting made it's here now. He looked human against Jacobs but like he said, he's not Chavez Jr and Canelo is not Jacobs. Enough said! No need to keep bringing up those past opponents unless he's trying to say Canelo had an easier out than he did. This whole team (to include Canelo and Golden Boy) is really lame at selling this fight. We hear more about Mayweather (and now Jacobs) than we hear bout the 2 people fighting September 16th.

[livershot73]

So what is it? You carried him or he gave you good learning experience cuz it can't be both guy. GGG is a fùcking liar and I'm dying to see his charrypicking asś lose.

Please explain WHERE in his statement GGG implies that he "carried him"....If I recall correctly, he has always praised Jacobs for his performance and has always spoke about him with a lot respect as a fighter. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.....

[livershot73]

So what is it? You carried him or he gave you good learning experience cuz it can't be both guy. GGG is a fùcking liar and I'm dying to see his charrypicking asś lose.

I'm picking Golovkin to beat Canelo but he need to stop repeating the BS. If he's not saying he carried Jacobs he's implying it by constantly bringing it up. It's not the first him or Sanchez said it. It does matter what led to the fight getting made it's here now. He looked human against Jacobs but like he said, he's not Chavez Jr and Canelo is not Jacobs. Enough said! No need to keep bringing up those past opponents unless he's trying to say Canelo had an easier out than he did. This whole team (to include Canelo and Golden Boy) is really lame at selling this fight. We hear more about Mayweather (and now Jacobs) than we hear bout the 2 people fighting September 16th.

I agree with you to a certain point (as far as repeating), but I'm almost certain they are only answering direct questions from reporters....and PLEASE, TELL ME WHO THAT IS IN YOUR AVI!!!!

[rrayvez]

Depends on what was accepted. Golovkin will look weak if he accepted like 25% after asking for 45/40%. Golovkins team have always been secretive when asked about financials. We only find out about them when the commissions reveal purses in the past. You claiming it's "common sense" it was Goldenboy that didn't want them revealed only shows your lack of it.

In short, your implication that Canelo or shall I say golden boy wanted to fight ggg
When they instead fought khan, Smith and Chavez jr does show a lack of common sense. Oscar himself just yesterday had an interview where he flat out said that Canelo wasn't ready for 160 and that he was really a welterweight and junior middle weight at the time. Now anyone who knows boxing knows that Canelo hadn't fought at welter in forever so its obvious to see who the liar is. Moot point, at least the fight is finally happening. Thanks to Daniel jacobs.

[WesternChamp]

I'm picking Golovkin to beat Canelo but he need to stop repeating the BS. If he's not saying he carried Jacobs he's implying it by constantly bringing it up. It's not the first him or Sanchez said it. It does matter what led to the fight getting made it's here now. He looked human against Jacobs but like he said, he's not Chavez Jr and Canelo is not Jacobs. Enough said! No need to keep bringing up those past opponents unless he's trying to say Canelo had an easier out than he did. This whole team (to include Canelo and Golden Boy) is really lame at selling this fight. We hear more about Mayweather (and now Jacobs) than we hear bout the 2 people fighting September 16th.

Do you feel the same way about how floyd supposedly carried conor also? Didnt think so.

[McNulty]

and PLEASE, TELL ME WHO THAT IS IN YOUR AVI!!!!

Are you referring to me or therother guy?

[McNulty]

He is absolutely positively not saying he carried Jacobs so get your head out of your a$$. Many people, myself included, thought that while dangerous Jacobs lacked the chin to withstand GGG's punches myself included. We were all surprised. GGG is simply saying that if that had been the case he wouldn't have gotten the Canelo fight AND that it was a good learning experience for him to go 12 rounds with a tough opponent. There is absolutely **** all to suggest that he carried Jacobs you ****ing hater.

Nowhere in that quote did he say he carried Jacobs. He stated what most observers knew. If he looked good he wouldn't be fighting Canelo. Your do desperate to find fault with Golovkin you read what you want into everything he says.

Where did he say he carried Jacobs, they've always shown Jacobs nothing but the utmost respect..stop trying to create a narrative that has never been there. The only people talking shh about Jacobs are the morons on here who don't want to acknowledge him as a great fighter.

You are such a douche bag. Are you a tough guy or not? Get in the ring with GGG and run your mouth. He makes Canelo look like an amateur. Blow him out.

Eh?

Where did you get the "carried him" from?

Please explain WHERE in his statement GGG implies that he "carried him"....If I recall correctly, he has always praised Jacobs for his performance and has always spoke about him with a lot respect as a fighter. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.....

There are no survivors in my fights.

If I look great against Jacobs…if I knocked him out, I would not be getting this fight with Canelo now.

I have never done that before.

Highlighted in bold for your pleasure!

Didn't he say that with Brook too then he denied it after? Seems to be a pattern with GGG when he looks like áss.

[Robbie Barrett]

In short, your implication that Canelo or shall I say golden boy wanted to fight ggg
When they instead fought khan, Smith and Chavez jr does show a lack of common sense. Oscar himself just yesterday had an interview where he flat out said that Canelo wasn't ready for 160 and that he was really a welterweight and junior middle weight at the time. Now anyone who knows boxing knows that Canelo hadn't fought at welter in forever so its obvious to see who the liar is. Moot point, at least the fight is finally happening. Thanks to Daniel jacobs.

Where did i imply that? The offer was on the table to fight in September before Golovkin fought Jacobs. Golovkin could have signed to fight Canelo and still fought Jacobs (this kind of deal has been done many times in the past). Golovkin is the one lying here.

[b00g13man]

Lame........

[future hendrixx]

little g and sanchez said the same after the brook fight. that they purposely let brook get shots in to lure canelo to fight him lol.. and every time somebody hits him its because he allows it for the "big drama show".

little g is full of **** and i see theyre still crying about jacobs fight night weight. wait till they see canelo rehydrated lol..

and the reason this fight took so long is because little g refused to accept his role as the b side and thought he could actually call shots on canelo.

but none of that matters cuz canelo is gonna massacre little g and flatline him in the late rounds. but of course they'll give canelo no credit they'll say he waited til ggg got old.

little g better buy a tuxedo for that coffin.