Why won't people admit- Jacobs exposed Golovkin.
Collapse
-
-
GGG wasnt exposed at all. Jacobs was a fcking giant 100% lean muscles and still got dropped. The right guy won that fight and I can't see how you can score for Jacobs.
Btw I think that Jacobs can beat Canelo. Jacobs is bigger and has better movement. Speed and power are about the same, but maybe even in those Jacobs is better than Canelo considering he fights at mw.Comment
-
I hate the word "exposed". It gets thrown around way too often. Exposed to me means anyone can do it and it will work. Maidana exposed Broner for his poor output and stamina, so now EVERYONE just throws a ton of punches at Broner and it will be a close fight at the very least.
Jacobs used in and out movement and his athletic ability to present a varied attack and plenty of angles. Andre Ward might be the only one from 160-175 that can fight that way. I'm not saying GGG can't be beat, because he can be beat, but not many can implement the gameplan that Danny Jacobs did against him.Comment
-
It was a closer fight than people expected, but that's about it.
Gennady clearly won that. He outboxed, outlanded, dropped down Jacobs. You can hardly make an argument for Jacobs winning more than 4-5 rounds.
+ I believe Jacobs gave it all he could. He almost collapsed at the end of the fight. He simply isn't good enough to beat GGG.Last edited by Simurgh; 08-30-2017, 09:47 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Great post, totally agree with every point you made here.It was a closer fight than people expected, but that's about it.
Gennady clearly won that. He outboxed, outlanded, dropped down Jacobs. You can hardly make an argument for Jacobs winning more than 4-5 rounds.
+ I believe Jacobs gave it all he could. He almost collapsed at the end of the fight. He simply isn't good enough to beat GGG.Comment
yeah, I'm sure it's for the profile pic
Comment