Originally posted by davef
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
So is GGG still short work ?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Metho_4u View PostAsswad...i said it was a wasteland...as in the entire time golovkin has been the top guy there...who was there? Macklin? Rosado, lemieux, geale, Stevens, Murray? Yeah, that's a top division alright. Everyone but you seems to understand that he's a weak champion in a weak division.
Lol you haved to get all personal because I insulted your boyfriend huh? It's ok, I understand the truth hurts.
You're the kind of moron who would have told Hopkins to leave the Middleweight division back in the day before he fought Tito and DLH.
I'm only calling you what is obviously the truth, sorry if it hurts. But it is clear you're a loser.Last edited by Diego Rodriguez; 08-30-2017, 10:55 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diego Rodriguez View PostThe only wasteland is between your ears. Golovkin's been a Middleweight since 2006. He should have fought Sergio but then Sergio didn't want to fight him, Cotto snuck in and then Canelo. It was some bad luck for Golovkin. And everyone doesn't seem to recognize him as a weak champion, he's ranked by virtually everyone in the top 10 P4P idiot. Instead of making up BS on boxing forums why don't you work on getting that GED, then you can possibly get a better job than flipping burgers.
You're the kind of moron who would have told Hopkins to leave the Middleweight division back in the day before he fought Tito and DLH.
I'm only calling you what is obviously the truth, sorry if it hurts. But it is clear you're a loser.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Metho_4u View Post*sigh* and yet you keep on talking about Hopkins because you obviously have no other REAL arguments. You really are dense.
The same crap you are saying about Golovkin was said about Hopkins. His competition was weak. He was a overrated. Tito would expose him. Most boxing people picked Tito to win that fight. When Hops beat Tito he finally got credit.
Just beat it chump, I'm sick of taking you to the woodshed and beating your butt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diego Rodriguez View PostNo moron I mention Hopkins because it is a parallel story. That might be beyond your comprehension.
The same crap you are saying about Golovkin was said about Hopkins. His competition was weak. He was a overrated. Tito would expose him. Most boxing people picked Tito to win that fight. When Hops beat Tito he finally got credit.
Just beat it chump, I'm sick of taking you to the woodshed and beating your butt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Metho_4u View PostHopkins moved up in weight by 15 lbs and took on top competition...thats where any similarities end (aside from the fact that he knew his place as the B side vs oscar and actually agreed to a cw)...was golovkin willing to do that? NOPE! Golovkin is a triple chump with a **** resume and has ducked the biggest challenges to fight guys who were on house arrest and a 100-1 underdog that trained at the friggen YMCA.
Hopkins fought Tito in 9/2001 (he was 4 months shy of 37 years old). This is the fight that finally brought him the recognition he deserved. This was his Canelo fight.
After he fought Tito he stayed in the MW division and faced DLH 3 full years later (nearly 40 years of age). DLH should have lost his last fight against Strum and didn't look good. I'm not blaming Hopkins for taking that fight.
After the DLH fight Hops stayed in the MW division for almost another year until he lost to Taylor.
Now go change your diaper because you keep crapping in it.
Comment
Comment