Only one man was ever able to catch him lunging In and that was after 42 rounds. How Is Pacquiao limited? As far as decent sized fighters, Pacquiao has spent his entire career fighting much bigger guys. I am not knocking your opinion but Pacquiao Is certainly not limited and many fighters have stated how awkward he Is to fight.
Crawford vs Floyd and Pac at 140
Collapse
-
I favor Pacman in a very good fight over Crawford. Crawford-Mayweather is a pick'em, lackluster fight.Comment
-
1.) Pacquiao compared to Crawford has a limited Right hand, doesn't have a very educated right hand.
2.) Lunges A LOT. Extremely open to counters.
3.) Is a very short fighter with a not a lot of reach.
4.) Pacquiao couldn't even outbox Marquez in four fights...a very short guy who he had a speed advantage over. Crawford would wait for Pacquiao to lunge in, and counter him.
2. Lunges a lot? Or areyou mimicking sheeps? PAC gives the illusion of lunging but os actually pivoting to the right in order to make angles for an upper cut or a straight left.
3. Short fighter but demolished fighters that are longer than him and beat them at their own game besides Floyd and Marquez.
4. Are you expecting Pacquiao whose style is taylor made for Marquez to beat one if the greatest counterpunchers at his own game? Thats like daring Crawford to say that he sgould Brawl with Errol Spence.Comment
-
Only one man was ever able to catch him lunging In and that was after 42 rounds. How Is Pacquiao limited? As far as decent sized fighters, Pacquiao has spent his entire career fighting much bigger guys. I am not knocking your opinion but Pacquiao Is certainly not limited and many fighters have stated how awkward he Is to fight.Comment
-
Only one man was ever able to catch him lunging In and that was after 42 rounds. How Is Pacquiao limited? As far as decent sized fighters, Pacquiao has spent his entire career fighting much bigger guys. I am not knocking your opinion but Pacquiao Is certainly not limited and many fighters have stated how awkward he Is to fight.
The 2000 Ravens were "limited" in a sense on offense, doesn't mean they aren't good.
I mean that he doesn't really have an educated right hand, when he's flustered with footwork and what not, he tends to lunge in.
Not to mention, Terence Crawford is a true welterweight [IMHO] just waiting to move to 147. By catch him coming in, I don't mean K.O him cold. I just mean catch him and make him wary of jumping in. Also he doesn't have a south paw advantage against Crawford.Comment
-
I find it funny how clowns would claim "pacquiao lunges, gets countered easily" when it took 42 rounds for one of the greatest counterpunchers of all time to actually catch him. And infact Floyd disnt even catch Pacquiao lunging in also but instead was caught by Pacquiao telegraphing the jab with a big left hand that wobbled him.
Pact@rds. SMH.
METH is a helluva drug.Comment
-
Me calling a fighter limited doesn't mean they aren't good.
The 2000 Ravens were "limited" in a sense on offense, doesn't mean they aren't good.
I mean that he doesn't really have an educated right hand, when he's flustered with footwork and what not, he tends to lunge in.
Not to mention, Terence Crawford is a true welterweight [IMHO] just waiting to move to 147. By catch him coming in, I don't mean K.O him cold. I just mean catch him and make him wary of jumping in. Also he doesn't have a south paw advantage against Crawford.Comment
-
I find it funny how clowns would claim "pacquiao lunges, gets countered easily" when it took 42 rounds for one of the greatest counterpunchers of all time to actually catch him. And infact Floyd disnt even catch Pacquiao lunging in also but instead was caught by Pacquiao telegraphing the jab with a big left hand that wobbled him.Comment
Comment