Crawford vs Floyd and Pac at 140

[Thraxox]

Crawford vs Pac that fought Hatton.
Crawford vs May that fought Gatti.

[ironmt]

I think they both beat Crawford.

[lparm]

Manny via murder

Floyd via ud

[Thraxox]

I think they both beat Crawford.

Crawford looks imprssive but at rhis point in terms of opposition both Manny and Floyd is head and shoulders above him. And xant really gauge how good Crawford is in comparison.

[WhatDisButtonDo]

Pacquiao is an amazing talent, but he is overrated... Pacquiao is extremely athletic but very limited, has a tendency to lunge in, and against decent sized welters or Jnr Welters he would find himself having trouble.
Floyd would outbox Crawford I'd expect but it'd be a good scrap.

[Thraxox]

Pacquiao is an amazing talent, but he is overrated... Pacquiao is extremely athletic but very limited, has a tendency to lunge in, and against decent sized welters or Jnr Welters he would find himself having trouble.
Floyd would outbox Crawford I'd expect but it'd be a good scrap.

Pacquiao veey limited? GTFO with that **** and watch Pacquiaos career.

[ironmt]

Crawford looks imprssive but at rhis point in terms of opposition both Manny and Floyd is head and shoulders above him. And xant really gauge how good Crawford is in comparison.

That Is true. Even though we haven't seen him In with the best fighters yet you can certainly tell that he has the skills and attributes to be a great fighter. He Is only 29 years old and should be around for quite a while yet, so he has plenty of time to make his mark and cement his legacy. At this point, If I was a betting man, I would take him over both Pacquiao and Mayweather. I don't think he beats either version that you provided In your example.

[Santa_]

Pacquiao is an amazing talent, but he is overrated... Pacquiao is extremely athletic but very limited, has a tendency to lunge in, and against decent sized welters or Jnr Welters he would find himself having trouble.
Floyd would outbox Crawford I'd expect but it'd be a good scrap.

[WhatDisButtonDo]

Pacquiao veey limited? GTFO with that **** and watch Pacquiaos career.

1.) Pacquiao compared to Crawford has a limited Right hand, doesn't have a very educated right hand.
2.) Lunges A LOT. Extremely open to counters.
3.) Is a very short fighter with a not a lot of reach.
4.) Pacquiao couldn't even outbox Marquez in four fights...a very short guy who he had a speed advantage over. Crawford would wait for Pacquiao to lunge in, and counter him.

[Thraxox]

That Is true. Even though we haven't seen him In with the best fighters yet you can certainly tell that he has the skills and attributes to be a great fighter. He Is only 29 years old and should be around for quite a while yet, so he has plenty of time to make his mark and cement his legacy. At this point, If I was a betting man, I would take him over both Pacquiao and Mayweather. I don't think he beats either version that you provided In your example.

Crawford beats Floyd and Pac at this point. Crawford only has 2-4 more years before it starts going downhill.