Comments Thread For: Sanchez: Canelo Best Counter-Puncher, Not Biggest Puncher for GGG
Collapse
-
To answer your question canelo has been challenging himself vs the absolute best consistently with much more frequency than Jacobs/Charlos/lara etc. & Whatever other hypejobs you wanna claim would"beat the dog shît" outta him.hes done that since 20 yrs old & these clowns have cherrypicked til older age vs straight bums,you claim Canelo cant name an opponent to have demonstrated his skills against like Jacobs,yet Jacobs only has 1 good robbery vs ggg thats it,& he was dropped in that fight too,Canelo since young age destroyed & ko'd fighters who have themselves destroyed or ko'd gggs best wins way before him &/or way better than him.
Angulo kod alcine/rosado in 1 rd apiece way before ggg dragged up rosado to mw & only kod him in 7,& alcine destroyed lemieux way before ggg but was obliterated in 1 rd by Angulo,Rubio was destroyed by Chavez Jr 4 yrs before ggg did, Canelo has fought the exact most difficult opponents & styles since age 22, in mayweather/ trout/Lara 3 exact ******nite styles,undefeated,trout is still jermalls best only good win &
he was booed afterwards because trout won imo (Jermalls the only decent charlo not yet whooped by a complete nohoper). Canelos fighting ggg next & you still are looking forward to hating by already saying hes gonna duck so & so, instead of asking why dont Jacobs/Charlo fight ANYONE,or each other instead of begging 4 a payday? Jermall will sit on his gifted #1 contender instead of challenging himself vs ANY mw,but he knows hes average so hell sit on it pîssing & moaning.
Alcine did not destroy Lemieux.
"When the fight started, Lemieux came out hard and fast as expected, bombing away with both hands looking to put an end to the fight quickly. Alcine had prepared for that though,DBE keeping a high guard to block many of the shots and staying on his toes moving effortlessly around the ring. Alcine, now 35 years old, was looking more like the fighter who, in 2007, went into the backyard of undefeated World Boxing Association (WBA) Light Middleweight Champion Travis Simms, in Bridgeport, Connecticut, to take Simms’ title in dominant fashion via 12-round unanimous decision.
By the middle rounds, it was clear that Lemieux was tiring and Alcine, 13 years his senior, was the fresher of the two, boxing beautifully and even staggering the heavy-handed Lemieux on a few occasions.
Heading into the championship rounds, the fight was close, but Alcine’s experience proved to be the difference, as he was able to sweep the last four rounds on the scorecards to win a majority decision with two tallies of 116-112 in his favor and the third judge calling the bout even at 114-114."
Who has Trout beat? Name one besides Cotto. Go on.
If Canelo has fought the most difficult there is name 3 that was less than 35 when he fought them, and were in the same weightclass as him. They should also have less than 15 months of lay-off.Comment
-
True, but if Jacob's public profile improves it could be made into a big money fight. That, of course, assumes Oscar will do business with Haymon, and if there is enough money involved Oscar will. All of this might be a moot point though because Canelo probably will not get by GGG.Comment
-
True, but if Jacob's public profile improves it could be made into a big money fight. That, of course, assumes Oscar will do business with Haymon, and if there is enough money involved Oscar will. All of this might be a moot point though because Canelo probably will not get by GGG.Comment
-
You killed this back and forth by bringing up P4P lists...that's an objectionable list created by people with biases. I say stack Canelo's resume and name one fighter on his resume that even goes the distance with Jacobs. JUST GIVE ME ONE NAME! One. Or you can continue to go the popularity route if you'd like and mention more p4p lists.Comment
-
To answer your question canelo has been challenging himself vs the absolute best consistently with much more frequency than Jacobs/Charlos/lara etc. & Whatever other hypejobs you wanna claim would"beat the dog shît" outta him.hes done that since 20 yrs old & these clowns have cherrypicked til older age vs straight bums,you claim Canelo cant name an opponent to have demonstrated his skills against like Jacobs,yet Jacobs only has 1 good robbery vs ggg thats it,& he was dropped in that fight too,Canelo since young age destroyed & ko'd fighters who have themselves destroyed or ko'd gggs best wins way before him &/or way better than him.
Angulo kod alcine/rosado in 1 rd apiece way before ggg dragged up rosado to mw & only kod him in 7,& alcine destroyed lemieux way before ggg but was obliterated in 1 rd by Angulo,Rubio was destroyed by Chavez Jr 4 yrs before ggg did, Canelo has fought the exact most difficult opponents & styles since age 22, in mayweather/ trout/Lara 3 exact ******nite styles,undefeated,trout is still jermalls best only good win &
he was booed afterwards because trout won imo (Jermalls the only decent charlo not yet whooped by a complete nohoper). Canelos fighting ggg next & you still are looking forward to hating by already saying hes gonna duck so & so, instead of asking why dont Jacobs/Charlo fight ANYONE,or each other instead of begging 4 a payday? Jermall will sit on his gifted #1 contender instead of challenging himself vs ANY mw,but he knows hes average so hell sit on it pîssing & moaning.Comment
-
Thats the thing your arguments are all more baseless.You argue Jacobs is more skilled faster etc. But this is boxing where the only thing that counts toward proving those things is who you've consistently done it against & their skill levels along with other variables like age.
Jacobs had accomplished jack shît prior to giving golovkin all he can handle. Before that fight he was known as a glassjaw with only 1 half decent win on his resume who was almost put to sleep by mora. I was one of the few anywhere who not only gave Jacobs a chance at winning but I told everyone that ggg is overrated & if he destroyed Jacobs like the rest on his resume hes the real deal as Jacobs was a decent b level win who would finally show us gggs true level.
But you trying to claim not only Jacobs is a all around better fighter() not to mention that hes supposedly more proven & that canelos a giant cherrypicker with weak opponents etc. just demonstrates how much of a hypocrit canelo hater u are whos the same one who hypocritically worships a bunch of fighters who are older & have a 20x weaker resume than him like charlo sisters & basically anyone whos black.
You use these lame claims like he will duck so & so. When those so & sos are career ultra cherrypickers who wont fight each other like charlos/lara etc. who wont fight any top opponent until they hit the lottery vs ggg/canelo, charlo just beat(& claimed it was a legit ko win deserving of respect) a 1 legged gimp,who Sulaiman had waiting in retirement for 2 yrs as #1 until haymon bribed him to give Charlo a completely undeserved title shot vs a retired 1 legged Pinocchio pedo doll Heiland.Comment
-
My guy? LMFAO i'm probably one of like 5 people here who spent the entire time of the lead up to Golovkin vs Jacobs warning people that he was a live dog but now it's because my guy had a tough time? Seriously I wish they paid y'all money for all these assumptions, it's downright hilarious. Canelo is the better boxer, go ahead and tell me how...what does Canelo do better than Jacobs because i'm curious as fk and please leave the typical "trump card" of name dropping Golovkin into every reply that's so common when mofo's can't make an argument.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SanchezCanelo Best Counter-Puncher, Not Biggest Puncher for GGG
Canelo has great timing, and Golovkin is slooooow.....
the red kid is gonna lite that boy up like a Christmas tree
[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/jc0qoTS750Mo0/*****.gif[/IMG]
Comment
Comment