Why didn't Hagler challenge himself

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sheldon312
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2016
    • 2649
    • 165
    • 65
    • 33,229

    #1

    Why didn't Hagler challenge himself

    Hagler is considered to be the greatest MW of all time which is arguable. But looking at his resume all his big wins were against smaller men moving up like Hearns and Duran. There's not one MW on his resume that screams "Great" if anything, Jones and Monzon have better resumes. Most of the greats went up and challenged themselves. Hagler didn't seem to want to do that. He could've went up and faced Michael Spinks but he chose to take the easy way out and stay in a dead division. Why does Hagler get a pass for this.
  • Raggamuffin
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2016
    • 8195
    • 453
    • 961
    • 43,263

    #2
    Originally posted by Sheldon312
    Hagler is considered to be the greatest MW of all time which is arguable. But looking at his resume all his big wins were against smaller men moving up like Hearns and Duran. There's not one MW on his resume that screams "Great" if anything, Jones and Monzon have better resumes. Most of the greats went up and challenged themselves. Hagler didn't seem to want to do that. He could've went up and faced Michael Spinks but he chose to take the easy way out and stay in a dead division. Why does Hagler get a pass for this.
    This is what's wrong with today's boxing fan. Monzons best wins came against smaller men in Napoles and Griffith.

    Comment

    • djtmal
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 12273
      • 1,200
      • 11
      • 39,097

      #3
      you had to LIVE it, before you can judge it........

      Comment

      • GrandpaBernard
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 17158
        • 4,480
        • 2,947
        • 114,399

        #4
        Because he dominated his division. Hagler stopped other guys from shining.

        The smaller fighters got established doing great work in the weight classes without Hagler.

        Comment

        • Robbie Barrett
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2013
          • 40891
          • 2,779
          • 667
          • 570,921

          #5
          There was no 168 division, he would have had to jump from 160-175. Do you see the size of Hagler compared to todays MW's?




          And they say Golovkin is small.

          Comment

          • The Big Dunn
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 69462
            • 9,538
            • 7,869
            • 287,568

            #6
            Originally posted by Sheldon312
            Hagler is considered to be the greatest MW of all time which is arguable. But looking at his resume all his big wins were against smaller men moving up like Hearns and Duran. There's not one MW on his resume that screams "Great" if anything, Jones and Monzon have better resumes. Most of the greats went up and challenged themselves. Hagler didn't seem to want to do that. He could've went up and faced Michael Spinks but he chose to take the easy way out and stay in a dead division. Why does Hagler get a pass for this.
            What the fuck is wrong with "boxing" fans these days? Eating right, avoiding drugs and alcohol and training so you can remain at the same weight over a 15 year career shows discipline, its not taking the easy way out.

            You actually think making weight your whole career equates to getting a pass for not going to 175 to fight Spinks?

            Comment

            • _original_
              Dinamita
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2009
              • 17838
              • 1,872
              • 789
              • 67,167

              #7
              OP is an ass clown.

              Comment

              • Kagami Taiga
                Generation of Miracles
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2010
                • 19078
                • 703
                • 228
                • 40,183

                #8
                He fought at a time where there were same day weigh ins and where the next above division was 175lbs...which was essentially the division BEFORE Heavy. I think that about covers it.

                Comment

                • hectari
                  Power to the People
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 22896
                  • 1,430
                  • 768
                  • 131,802

                  #9
                  When hagler fought there was no 168.

                  He wasnt even a huge middleweight he was even smaller than golovkin. He walked around at 170 and never more so weight cutting no issue, fighters were all slim and in shale and fought at their or near their walk around weights because of same day weigh ins.

                  Comment

                  • The Big Dunn
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 69462
                    • 9,538
                    • 7,869
                    • 287,568

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Kagami Taiga
                    He fought at a time where there were same day weigh ins and where the next above division was 175lbs...which was essentially the division BEFORE Heavy. I think that about covers it.
                    Good, solid post dude. I'd green you if I could.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP