Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why does Charlo have to "PROVE" himself to fight GGG?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    I remember when FMJ said Cotto had to prove himself, become a household name and be his own boss in order to get a fight

    Comment


    • #12
      Funny people say this but totally neglect why GGG didn't get his shot at bigger names earlier in his career. "Who has Golovkin fought?" We've seen that line from many over several years. But then you see Heilands only notable name is Macklin, who is supposedly a no name for GGG but now is a worthy name for Charlo because it's an eliminator. Stay consistent

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by GriffTannen View Post
        gg was gonna fight that cripple at one point lol.. who did wade and monroe beat.. theyre bums
        Wade and Monroe weren't one legged cripples that couldn't even walk. Heiland shouldn't have been allowed to fight

        Charlo proved nothing with this fight

        or maybe he proved he's just another pampered, priviledged black murican fighter

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by lopetego View Post
          Wade and Monroe weren't one legged cripples that couldn't even walk. Heiland shouldn't have been allowed to fight

          Charlo proved nothing with this fight

          or maybe he proved he's just another pampered, priviledged black murican fighter
          I don't think you can blame Charlo though. He beat who they put in front of him. I am sure he wasn't planning on fighting a cripple.


          I like the Charlo-Golovkin fight. It wouldn't happen until next year so Charlo might as well fight someone else in the interim.

          Comment


          • #15
            Golovkinites are scared to death of Charlo...plain and simple

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by AKAcronym View Post
              Funny people say this but totally neglect why GGG didn't get his shot at bigger names earlier in his career. "Who has Golovkin fought?" We've seen that line from many over several years. But then you see Heilands only notable name is Macklin, who is supposedly a no name for GGG but now is a worthy name for Charlo because it's an eliminator. Stay consistent
              Charlo is young and just moved to 160 in his last fight..lol...ur an idiot

              Comment


              • #17
                I'd like to see the fight since I like both but I already know once the fight is over, people are going to be hating. I prefer Charlo to get more experience at the weight before GGG but if he thinks he's ready, then go for it.

                Comment


                • #18
                  ****ing hilarious. Took canelo 4 years to fight ggg and ggg has a fight lined up and already he's ducking charlo. Can't make this **** up. WOW.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    I knew a charlo would be the great black hope once ggg looked his age. Yall really just want a black man to beat a white man but protect davis from the all powerful white man loma

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by larryxxx. View Post
                      brook didnt even prove himself at 147 and got an immediate shot at ggg..wtf did willie monroe prove??? Or wade?? Oh wait yall are going to say wade was mandatory right?? Well so is charlo!!!! Why all the roadblocks for charlo??? Rosado came straight to 160 and got a shot(where did he prove himself)???

                      Ya'll are full of **** and refuse to just admit ya'll want no parts of charlo as ya'll feel he is a threat
                      ggg is not ducking charlo you moron.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP