Comments Thread For: Golovkin: I'm Not Small Like Canelo's Opponents, I Want KO Win!

[Bronx2245]

What is your point. Lara moves. Floyd moves. Cotto moves.


Canelo is very flat footed. They will get into a fire fight and Golovkins power will make a mark.

Chepo will stop the fight. 10-11

My point is that it is a little hypocritical to throw shade on Canelo for fighting "smaller" guys, when GGG ducked Ward, to wait on "smaller" guys to come to 160! On top of that, those "smaller" guys that Canelo fought were a lot better than the guys GGG fought. In fact, if GGG would've come to 155, we would be, at the minimum, watching Golovkin vs. Alvarez II in September. I like GGG, but sometimes he and able say some things that seem very hypocritical. Here are few more examples:

GOLOVKIN'S TRAINER SLINGS HYPOCRISY: CHARLO'S GOTTA EARN HIS SHOT AT GENNADY

http://www.fighthype.com/news/article30244.html

[Fabes88]

I understand why he wanted Cotto and Canelo, but they fought @ 155. They weren't really middleweights. So, in fact GGG wanted smaller guys, yet he's criticizing Canelo's choice of little guys! I think the Trout that Canelo beat was better than Murray, but not Jacobs. However, GGG has not faced a fighter like Floyd, Lara, or Cotto.

They have that lineal title though. I understand what you're saying but they have something that belongs to him. There's no such weight division as 155

[Diego Rodriguez]

I understand why he wanted Cotto and Canelo, but they fought @ 155. They weren't really middleweights. So, in fact GGG wanted smaller guys, yet he's criticizing Canelo's choice of little guys! I think the Trout that Canelo beat was better than Murray, but not Jacobs. However, GGG has not faced a fighter like Floyd, Lara, or Cotto.

Then they should never have stepped into the MW discussion which they did when they captured the title.

[Beercules]

My point is that it is a little hypocritical to throw shade on Canelo for fighting "smaller" guys, when GGG ducked Ward, to wait on "smaller" guys to come to 160! On top of that, those "smaller" guys that Canelo fought were a lot better than the guys GGG fought. In fact, if GGG would've come to 155, we would be, at the minimum, watching Golovkin vs. Alvarez II in September. I like GGG, but sometimes he and able say some things that seem very hypocritical. Here are few more examples:

GOLOVKIN'S TRAINER SLINGS HYPOCRISY: CHARLO'S GOTTA EARN HIS SHOT AT GENNADY

http://www.fighthype.com/news/article30244.html

You're comparing Canelo to fighters who have feet and also now using irrelevant logic.




Does Canelo use movement like Floyd. Lara even Cotto.


He is squared when he punches. He has good upper body movement but then again how long can he keep that up with Golovkins pressure. Hard shots.

Stamina is a huge factor here. Golovkin has it. Canelo doesn't.

[-Kev-]

Yeah one did.

Two boxers who never fought at 160 did. Rosado and Brook.

Three boxers who never fought at 154 came up to fight Canelo. Hatton, Lopez and Khan.

I'd say with that fact, GGG shouldn't really be talking ****.

[WesternChamp]

I want win, i not small, i want ko, i true champion. Damm was hard reading all that from ggg.

[Mr.Fantastic]

GGG forgot his own opponents came from 147 and 154.

Like most MWs that have been great. Hopkins did it, Hagler did it, Monzon did it, GGG did it, and great MWs in the future will do it.

[Diego Rodriguez]

My point is that it is a little hypocritical to throw shade on Canelo for fighting "smaller" guys, when GGG ducked Ward, to wait on "smaller" guys to come to 160! On top of that, those "smaller" guys that Canelo fought were a lot better than the guys GGG fought. In fact, if GGG would've come to 155, we would be, at the minimum, watching Golovkin vs. Alvarez II in September. I like GGG, but sometimes he and able say some things that seem very hypocritical. Here are few more examples:

GOLOVKIN'S TRAINER SLINGS HYPOCRISY: CHARLO'S GOTTA EARN HIS SHOT AT GENNADY

http://www.fighthype.com/news/article30244.html

He never "ducked" Ward. He never waited on guys to come up to 160lbs. Do you understand Golovkin is a Middleweight and those guys had the MW title.

Nothing hypocritical about Sanchez saying Charlo needs to earn his shot. I think Charlo is a very good fighter and dangerous but beating a middle tier opponent who has beat absolute crap in his last 4 fights over 3 years doesn't land you a title fight. I don't give an F what the crooked WBC says.

[Lester Tutor]

He never "ducked" Ward. He never waited on guys to come up to 160lbs. Do you understand Golovkin is a Middleweight and those guys had the MW title.

Nothing hypocritical about Sanchez saying Charlo needs to earn his shot. I think Charlo is a very good fighter and dangerous but beating a middle tier opponent who has beat absolute crap in his last 4 fights over 3 years doesn't land you a title fight. I don't give an F what the crooked WBC says.

Hi Maxi!!!!

[Lester Tutor]

They have that lineal title though. I understand what you're saying but they have something that belongs to him. There's no such weight division as 155

That's a flawed point of view. Lineage means you have to fight the guy who beat the guy, so if a defending Lineal fighter is in the realm of divisional rules, then why didn't Golovkin fight Alvarez at 155?

If Suleiman had said the weight limit would be through a contract between GBP and K2 to negotiate industry would've not cared, and the weight, pun intended, would've been on K2 to accept.

Why is that important? Because Gennady could've tried to beat Alvarez at 155, had the Lineal and finish the undisputed ordeal at 160 without anything to do with Alvarez. If Alvarez ever wanted the rematch or opportunity GBp would have to submit to B side and meet to 160 demands via K2.

Now we are there at 160 and who is the A side?