Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Jermall Charlo: Are Canelo, Golovkin Ready For Me? I'm Ready!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by IRONCHINHAGLER View Post
    Heiland was wbc #1 for the last 2 yrs....Wbc HW champ Bumsquad has yet to fight 1 Mando in over 2 yrs. Canelo has already shown he cares little about alphabet belts. Doubt GGG waste time on unknown Charlo this late in career.
    Heiland was a secondary mandatory for the WBC belt due to these corrupt sanctioning bodies tendancy to have multiple beltholders. GGG's mandatory status superceded Heilands. Secondly, 2 years ago Miguel Cotto held the WBC belt. He lost it to Canelo in November of 2015 and then Canelo gave up the belt in May of 2016 when GGG was his mandatory. The WBC then elevated GGG but didn't obligate him to fight his mandatory and that probably has a lot to do with the fact that GGG pays them sanctioning fees every time he defends the belt (and he does it often) even when his opponent chooses not to fight for this belt or that particular belt. For instance, GGG is putting his WBC belt on the line (and paying the sanctioning fee for it) even though Canelo has went out of his way to say he won't fight for that belt because of his animosity towards the WBC.
    Last edited by yankees7448; 08-02-2017, 06:18 PM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by NYG View Post
      Lmao what the **** are you talking about man?
      laugh away simpleton you just do not understand.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
        When did Canelo avoid him?? He just barely arrived last year? 2 years ago not 1 person even thought about that fight not related to Charlo.

        IMO i thought he lost to Trout??? He gets a bad loss at 160 he might never recover. Casual fans drop their favorite fighters as soon as they get a loss and then move on to the next...
        Both Charlo's were avoided by Canelo for the last year or so.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
          Ok and if that's a soft touch then what do you call 1 legged jersey shore reject Heilland? FACT Smith would be one of the BEST wins on Charlo's entire pathetic resume and destroys that bum Charlo just fought this weekend. Canelo has stepped up and fought much better fighters then Charlo and especially the bums he chooses to fight. Ducking Lara and Jacobs guys in his own stable while Canelo and GGG already stepped up and fought them. SMH
          No one is dis*****g the fact that Heiland sucks. But don't try to reason away the fact that Smith ****** as well and had he not held a belt he would have had no credibility whatsoever as an opponent for someone like Canelo.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by aceventura View Post
            yes bums like kirkland and chavez fraud jr have more class hahahahahaaha nice one ******
            What the hell are you even talking about?!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by yankees7448 View Post
              No one is dis*****g the fact that Heiland sucks. But don't try to reason away the fact that Smith ****** as well and had he not held a belt he would have had no credibility whatsoever as an opponent for someone like Canelo.
              He also wouldnt of been chosen. He was chosen because Saunders has the last belt and he was about to fight GGG. If GGG owned all 4 major belts he would of been ***ED.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by OmarRueben View Post
                Both Charlo's were avoided by Canelo for the last year or so.
                D idnt the brother lose like every round to a tomato can?? He was like 4 rounds from getting a shutout.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
                  He also wouldnt of been chosen. He was chosen because Saunders has the last belt and he was about to fight GGG. If GGG owned all 4 major belts he would of been ***ED.
                  I am thinking you're either confusing who you were talking to and thus confusing the debate. Because Canelo choosing Smith had nothing to do with GGG or Billy Joe Saunders.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by OmarRueben View Post
                    Both Charlo's were avoided by Canelo for the last year or so.
                    NEVER heard one boxing writer/expert/analyst/commentator call out Canelo for supposedly avoiding a Charlo bc nobody gives a crap about a Charlo!!!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by yankees7448 View Post
                      I am thinking you're either confusing who you were talking to and thus confusing the debate. Because Canelo choosing Smith had nothing to do with GGG or Billy Joe Saunders.
                      He became Built Ho's mandatory BEATING Smith. You need me provide link??

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP