Jacobs had Broner winning LMAO

[soul_survivor]

Nah this is too much man. I'm reading "Mirko Troll Cop" saying he heard Jacobs say Broner won last night.

No wonder he also felt he beat Golovkin.



Shameless from Jacobs.

This is the same guy who thought he beat GGG

[RoyJonesJrp4pno1]

Hey Danny, Broner is the black guy and Garcia is the Mexican guy.

[RetroSpeed05]

Just like he thought he "beat" GGG.

[Vegemil]

Lol Ego in the background like, "***** what?".

[DannYankee]

Boxers don't automatically make good judges. Also he even says in the video he is biased because he was rooting for Broner .

[jas]

looks tipsy

seen him before looking tipsy after thurman porter:

[Eff Pandas]

LOL I just looked that up myself & posted it in the MTC thread cuz it sounded nutso to me.

For full disclosure he does outright say he might be biased cuz he wanted Broner to win or picked him or whatever, but even when I want someone to win or have picked them I don't think I've ever had them winning in a fight so seemingly easy to score + having one way action like this fight was.

With all the commentary Jacobs does these days idk that you can ever have this cat doing a scorecard off of that wacky stance without insuring it gets joked about. No one being reasonable shoulda had Broner winning that fight or I'd even argue winning more than 4 rounds which I thought was a very favorable take for Broner by a judge or two last night with the 8-4 scorecards (I gave Broner 2 rounds). If you gave Broner 5 rounds or more last night & don't own a AB shirt or got his Youtube channel bookmarked YDKSAB cuz being biased I can at least understand, but if you aren't biased wtf were you seeing to think that fight was close?

[boxinggod101]

Well.. I always thought Jacobs was a smart guy.. but now I just can't see it... It's either ur dumb as a rock or u just trolling.. wich one is it Jacobs?

[boxinggod101]

LOL I just looked that up myself & posted it in the MTC thread cuz it sounded nutso to me.

For full disclosure he does outright say he might be biased cuz he wanted Broner to win or picked him or whatever, but even when I want someone to win or have picked them I don't think I've ever had them winning in a fight so seemingly easy to score + having one way action like this fight was.

With all the commentary Jacobs does these days idk that you can ever have this cat doing a scorecard off of that wacky stance without insuring it gets joked about. No one being reasonable shoulda had Broner winning that fight or I'd even argue winning more than 4 rounds which I thought was a very favorable take for Broner by a judge or two last night with the 8-4 scorecards (I gave Broner 2 rounds). If you gave Broner 5 rounds or more last night & don't own a AB shirt or got his Youtube channel bookmarked YDKSAB cuz being biased I can at least understand, but if you aren't biased wtf were you seeing to think that fight was close?

Anyone who gave Broner more than 2 maybe 3 is biased. He didn't win that much.

[champion4ever]

To me personally, that was a one sided beating if I never saw one. Garcia clearly won the fight. It wasn't even close or controversial. As far as Jacobs is concerned, I'm willing to cut him some slack.

He was judging the fight emotionally and not empirically. He's clearly a fan of Adrien's and wanted him to win and was rooting for him to win. That's why he came up with such a subjective and partial conclusion.

It's called denial.