Did Wlad Dominate Peter?

[Hous]

Wlad was hurt before that sequence began, and tried to duck under Peter's arm, moving past him, turning his back to him.

You can't do that.

He did that because he was stunned and had no legs, the ref saw that, and that's why the knock down counted.

Show me where Wlad went under Sam Peters arm? Thats right he didn't. There was one time where he went to clinch and Peter turned his body to prevent it and then punched him in the back of the head, but he still didnt go under his arm. I give that one to Peter, but Im talking about Peter holding Wlads head down twice and then punching Wlad in the back of the head when Wlad wasn't attempting to clinch. Im saying one KD was legit of the three disputed KDs.

Is there even a rule about going under ones arm? I never heard of it.

For the record I voted Wlad didnt dominate.

[Bozo_no no]

Show me where Wlad went under Sam Peters arm?

It couldn't be anymore clear, Peter throws, and Wlad ducks under his arm and looks to move past him. He did this or somthing like this at several times in the 5th round alone because he was hurt, desperate and stumbling all over. He also lunged forward and tried to wrap both his arms around Peter's waste.

The point is, when you're turning your head and back away from coming pucnes, you are at fault if you get hit in the back of the head.


This is not difficult to understand, and the ref was standing right there watching.

They were legit knock downs. End of story.

[vB Martin]

Did you seriously say Wlad was on the verge of being KOed? All three of the KDs were caused by illegal blows to the back of the head if I remember correctly...

No Wlad didnt dominate, dominate is what Wlad did to Byrd.

Only 2 of the KDs were the result of blows to the back of the head. The other was definitely a legit KD.

as for the 2 back of the head KDs, they were a result of Little Klit ducking away from the punches as Peter launched them. They were a much his fault as Peter's.

[antihero]

No. Wlad didn't dominate to my mind. He probably won 9 out of the 12 rounds but it wasn't that convincing and he was holding and clinching a lot. Peter looked a lot shorter and couldn't cut off the ring enough. It was an important win for Wlad though.

[beez721]

I was at the fight and though Peter won, simply my opinion, but Wlad held A LOT, and was backing up A LOT. He looked scared of Peter the whole fight.

how much did you have to drink that night?

[beez721]

It couldn't be anymore clear, Peter throws, and Wlad ducks under his arm and looks to move past him. He did this or somthing like this at several times in the 5th round alone because he was hurt, desperate and stumbling all over. He also lunged forward and tried to wrap both his arms around Peter's waste.

The point is, when you're turning your head and back away from coming pucnes, you are at fault if you get hit in the back of the head.


This is not difficult to understand, and the ref was standing right there watching.

They were legit knock downs. End of story.

legit or not it really doesnt matter. wlad had peter hurt badly in the last round and won the fight. the people who dont like him just need to get over it and move on. maybe next fight you'll get your wish,,lol. lets just hope we see some good fights coming up

[Parody]

Only 2 of the KDs were the result of blows to the back of the head. The other was definitely a legit KD.

as for the 2 back of the head KDs, they were a result of Little Klit ducking away from the punches as Peter launched them. They were a much his fault as Peter's.

Needless to say it was a retaliation for Klitschko's holding strategy, punching in the back of head is illegal, yet holding constantly is legal.

[leff]

Needless to say it was a retaliation for Klitschko's holding strategy, punching in the back of head is illegal, yet holding constantly is legal.

thats true, but is it equally illegal, holding is almost execpted in pro boxing rabbitpunching is not

[Parody]

thats true, but is it equally illegal, holding is almost execpted in pro boxing rabbitpunching is not

Does'nt matter, both of them are illegal, and wlad did hold thats why Peter's Knockdowns should be counted legit, if he did'nt hold that much in that fight and peter still rabit punched, i would have counted those 2 knockdowns not legit, but when both guys are at fault, you cant just look at one and say "Hey that was illegal" and blah blah blah...

A rematch should happen to clear the controversy.

[Bozo_no no]

legit or not it really doesnt matter. wlad had peter hurt badly in the last round and won the fight. the people who dont like him just need to get over it and move on. maybe next fight you'll get your wish,,lol. lets just hope we see some good fights coming up

The only ones who need to move on are the nut huggers who can't get past mild critisisms or plain facts without ranting and raving.

How many posts are there complaining about the 1st two knock downs?

Of course he deserved the win, but he did not dominate (that's silly) and he WAS knocked down THREE times.


It's unreal how many people can't get over that.