Did Wlad Dominate Peter?

[Bozo_no no]

that hit was in the back of the head...period. ILLEGAL

Are we really back to this?

It's NOT illegal when Wlad turns his head away from punches as he did wildly stumbling and falling all over in that 5th round.

[JDizzle79]

Are we really back to this?

It's NOT illegal when Wlad turns his head away from punches as he did wildly stumbling and falling all over in that 5th round.

well, people can say what they want. Call him glass-jawed, ****sexual...whatever. just because people say it doesn't make it true. He won a gold medal in the Olympics and has won two different belts in the Heavyweight division and he wants to Unify. Let history tell his story when the time is done

[Bozo_no no]

well, people can say what they want. Call him glass-jawed, ****sexual...whatever. just because people say it doesn't make it true. He won a gold medal in the Olympics and has won two different belts in the Heavyweight division and he wants to Unify. Let history tell his story when the time is done

What does any of that have to do with the post of mine you quoted?

The knock downs in the Peter fight were all legit, because he was flailing and turning his head and upper body away from his opponent and the punches coming at him.

[JDizzle79]

What does any of that have to do with the post of mine you quoted?

The knock downs in the Peter fight were all legit, because he was flailing and turning his head and upper body away from his opponent and the punches coming at him.

a hit to the back of the head is illegal...period. And who won the fight?!?! the answer is hard for some to swallow, but he did win. I don't think he "dominated", but he wasn't bleeding and didn't look like he just ran the boston marathon either.

[Bozo_no no]

a hit to the back of the head is illegal...period.

No, that's wrong.

Wlad was turning his head and upper body away from punches in that 5th rounnd while he had no legs under him. He was at fault for getting hit because he was turning away from his opponent.

That's all I adressed with you.

And who won the fight?!?! the answer is hard for some to swallow, but he did win. I don't think he "dominated", but he wasn't bleeding and didn't look like he just ran the boston marathon either.

Again I don't get why you're telling me this, all I mentioned to you was the validity of the knock downs.

The point of this thread was Evil trying to say it was a dominating win for Wlad. It was not.

It's that simple, I'm not sure where all the other arguments are coming from.

[JDizzle79]

No, that's wrong.

Wlad was turning his head and upper body away from punches in that 5 rounnd while he had no legs under him. He was at fault for getting hit because he was turning away from his opponent.

That's all I adressed with you.



Again I don't get why you're telling me this, all I mentioned to you was the validity of the knock downs.

The point of this thread was Evil trying to say it was a dominating win for Wlad. It was not.

It's that simple, I'm not sure where all the other arguments are coming from.

LOL, you have a good point. I'm not trying to flame or anything. It's just the fact that there are a lot of people that post here that simply hate that Wlad has a belt again and come up with excuses why he isn't good. I'm just frustrated I guess. I like him as a fighter but I'm not a nut-hugger. With all the alphabet belts out there, these fighters did earn them by winning. My bad for straying from the original topic. No, Wlad did not dominate Peter.

[Hitman932]

What does any of that have to do with the post of mine you quoted?

The knock downs in the Peter fight were all legit, because he was flailing and turning his head and upper body away from his opponent and the punches coming at him.

lame as ever i see

god forbid samuel peter ever throw a straight punch or something resembling a respectable hook. i guess wlad klitschko is the first man ever to bend down at the waist in a boxing ring. and i mean i must be crazy but i swear that ducking from punches is a fairly commonly used tactic??

i mean why throw a punch at wlads jaw when he is hurt and stumbling around the ring when the only punch in your repetoire is an overweight overhand right?

if sam peter bent over like wlad did 100 times and exposed the back of his head wlad wouldnt throw one ridiculous illegal blow the way peter did, but im sure you find it hard to believe that.

so ive been reading this thread and it looks like you still live with your mom. she must make a great meatloaf.

[Bozo_no no]

lame as ever i see

god forbid samuel peter ever throw a straight punch or something resembling a respectable hook. i guess wlad klitschko is the first man ever to bend down at the waist in a boxing ring. and i mean i must be crazy but i swear that ducking from punches is a fairly commonly used tactic??

i mean why throw a punch at wlads jaw when he is hurt and stumbling around the ring when the only punch in your repetoire is an overweight overhand right?

if sam peter bent over like wlad did 100 times and exposed the back of his head wlad wouldnt throw one ridiculous illegal blow the way peter did, but im sure you find it hard to believe that.

Funny how you can manage to ramble on that much without saying a thing.

As usual with nut huggers like yourslef, the topic upsets you, so you look to lash out dispite having nothing to say.

Those knock downs were legit, Wlad was stumbling all over the ring turning his head and upper body away from punches, and went down because he was hurt and had no legs under him.

Nowhere did anyone dispute he won the fight. But he did not dominate, and he was knocked down three times.

Learn to deal with things like this (even though they upset you) and you'll have a lot less crying to do.

so ive been reading this thread and it looks like you still live with your mom. she must make a great meatloaf.

Lies made up by one nut hugger to be eaten up by the others. I own my own home which is probably worth more than your entire family. *****.

[beez721]

the fight was scored 114-111 by all judges. had peter not KDd wlad 3 times, it wouldve been 117-111, 9 rounds for wlad and 3 for peter.

despite the KDs, wlad used his jab, size, reach, and power to keep peter at bay for most of the entire fight. peter ate jab after jab after jab and was even wobbled by a jab. with a head made of granite, sam peter managed to stay on his feet the entire fight, losing a 12 round decision.

the question is: did wlad dominate the fight (even though he was KDd three times)?

IMO, he did. aside from the KDs, peter didnt score a single round without a KD. all he did was eat punches, get clinched and throw wild swinging punches and landed very few. even the first and second KDs were rather questionable, but the third was 100% legit. wlad statistically and physically dominated the smaller and slower peter.

not sure I could use the word dominate,,but he won pretty handily. I was still disappointed by his performance. if he would have let his left hook go on the inside instead of clinching he may have stopped peter and also avoid those shots behind the head that put him down

[RAESAAD]

Hell no he did not dominate Peter......He survived Peter.