Could a prime Hector Camacho beat Salvador Sanchez?
Collapse
-
-
No way in ****ing hell. In my opinion he would've eventually crossed paths with JCC and would have beaten him too.Comment
-
The Camacho i'm talking about is the one that beat Rafael Bazooka Limon, Jose Luiz Ramirez, Rafael Solis & Cornealous Boza Edwards (Camacho's speed just plain shut out the opposition & he also had pop in his punches).I don't know which Hector Camacho you are referring to but I'm referring to the 135 lbs boxer/puncher Hector Camacho who faced Edwin Rosario in 1986 by squaring up flat-footed and who was clipped and badly hurt several times by him throughout the bout. That version of Camacho would have lost to Sanchez at 130.
I'll grant you that Camacho would have had the size advantage because he has never competed at the 126 lbs weight division as a pro. However post Rosario, the 140 Camacho would have stood a much better chance of defeating Sanchez, due to his defensive prowess and his unwillingness and reluctance to exchange punches with him.
The reason why is that Camacho had become just a pure boxer by that time who was unwilling to engage. He would have never settled down on his punches for power. He would have implemented a lot of lower body movement, thereby making him very difficult for Sanchez to hit.
By the way, the Camacho that fought Edwin Rosario would not have lost to Sanchez (if anything I give it a toss up). And he did not fight Edwin Rosario flat-footed, he was sticking & moving, it so happened that when he momentarily stopped, Rosario got him with a hook. But the fact that he was not even knocked down & that he rebounded & started sticking & moving again was a credit to him. Edwin Rosario applied a lot of pressure & can ****! Remember this was at lightweight 135 lbs, 2 divisions higher than what Sanchez fought. I am a fan of Salvadore Sanchez. Please take into account that Macho was at a higher wgt & had tremendous hand & foot speed, was a southpaw & can punch.
You can dismiss the 140 Camacho out of the equation since Sanchez only fought as a featherwgt & most likely he would've moved up to 130 lbs. So it really makes no sense in referring to the 140 lbs Macho.Last edited by sugar ray lenrd; 07-25-2017, 01:28 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
You mean try to wear him down like Jose Luiz Ramirez tried. Camacho shut him out & even dropped him.Comment
-
Yes all those fights took place at a 130 and a 135 lbs. I agree that Camacho was one hell of a fighter back in the day; Especially before the Edwin Rosario fight and before moving up to 140.The Camacho i'm talking about is the one that beat Rafael Bazooka Limon, Jose Luiz Ramirez, Rafael Solis & Cornealous Boza Edwards (Camacho's speed just plain shut out the opposition & he also had pop in his punches). I am a fan of Salvadore Sanchez. Please take into account that Macho was at a higher wgt & had tremendous hand & foot speed, was a southpaw & can punch.
In addition, he would have given Sanchez a run for his money at 130 since he was the overall natural bigger guy. One thing I can say for sure is that fight would have definitely been a barn burner.
Also, I tend to agree; Camacho probably would have been the slight favorite going into that bout too. However, one cannot dismiss that P4P Salvador Sanchez was the overall better fighter though.Comment
-
Comment
-
Camacho was something special in his prime. That would had been a great fight. Camacho also possessed a great chinComment
Comment