Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
View Post
And I never said Salido was an A-level fighter, although he's underrated. Fought pretty even with Juan Manuel Marquez for one, at the lower weights where Marquez was big. Beat JuanMa twice. Salido just gets underrated because Mikey Garcia dominated him, but now we know Mikey Garcia was a welterweight fighting at 126. I don't know how did it but he did, and it kind of skews everything. In any case, fighting a good fighter like Salido when he weighs in half a weight class above you, then rehydrates to an even bigger advantage, is a huge test, especially when he's allowed to use that 10 pound weight advantage to punch you in the balls all night, and it's only your 2nd pro fight.
If you don't acknowledge what actually happened that night, and all you look at is a sheet on boxrec, then why even discuss boxing? For example Lomachenko's performance against Salido was actually more impressive than Floyd's first performance against Castillo, the only difference is the judges protected Floyd that night but not Lomachenko. Otherwise Salido and Castillo were very similar. Some will argue Castillo was better, but he didn't miss weight that fight, and it wasn't Floyd's 2nd pro fight, so it all evens out. And Castillo actually dominated the second half of that fight, whereas it was Lomachenko who almost knocked out Salido in the 12th round of their fight.
Floyd also didn't have a referee working against him like Lomachenko did. And yet Floyd still struggled that fight. Lomachenko was able to perform similarly, arguably better when you factor in the big 12th round, despite having everything against him.
So why is it OK for Floyd to put in a performance like that and still be a supposed legend in the sport, but you want to keeping dogging Lomachenko for performing just as well or better in much more unfair circumstances in only his 2nd pro fight? If it's because corrupt judges protected Floyd but not Lomachenko, and all you care about is how corrupt authority figures define something for you instead of what you see yourself, that would make you a sheep. But I'm not saying you are, hopefully you're not.
Comment