Comments Thread For: Chocolatito Over the Shock of His First Loss, Aims For Knockout

[ceylon mooney]

KO? not the kind where hes counted out. no effin way. gonzales beat his ass last time and dude looked fresh as a daisy. so no way hes gonna put him down for a 10 count. i dont think well have 2 rigged decisions in a row, tho.

whats VERY possible is pacquiao-margarito situation. thats kinda likely.

[ceylon mooney]

The Thai guy deserved his win, period. The fight was competitive.

Look people.

The Thai gave Roman the rematch, immediately.

Roman is scared to fight again vs Estrada or Cuadras.

fight was good but not close. according to the criteria for scoring pro boxing, it was 9-3 or 10-2 depending on how generous you were to rungsvai for lookin great. it was a lopsided loss regardless, at least according to how pro boxing matches are scored.

i believe rungsvai would have done it anyway, the wbc ordered an immediate rematch

[Idgogay4AJ]

The Thai was better on the night, no way is he looking forward to fighting him again, he could have hit him with a brick that night and he'd still walk forward....

[tokon]

People is crazy.

Sir Rungvisai did a great fight too, yep, he is dirty but that's the fault of the lack of defense that Chocolatito has.

He doesn't know how to box with good defense, he is a pressure fighter but too frontal.

People need to look the fight vs Vargas 1 like 7 years ago, that fight was toe vs toe but Vargas is a C class fighter and was not too strong like the Thai.

The Thai guy deserved his win, period. The fight was competitive.

Look people.

The Thai gave Roman the rematch, immediately.

Roman is scared to fight again vs Estrada or Cuadras.

Correct.

Both fighters were responsible for the head clashes not just Rungvisai.

I watched the fight live PPV and thought the Thai fighter deserved the decision.

The rematch might go differently, then again it might not!

[REMOVE SHARK 55]

Chocalito didn't get robbed at all. It was a close fight & was scored appropriately IMO.

[Mexican_Puppet]

Correct.

Both fighters were responsible for the head clashes not just Rungvisai.

I watched the fight live PPV and thought the Thai fighter deserved the decision.

The rematch might go differently, then again it might not!

Exactly!

I agree with you.

But Chocolatito is ******ly protected by the media and fans.

I don't know why but that's a reality.

All the people and media were crying like *****es, saying that was the robbery of the century.

Please... wtf with the people.

Good and competitive fight, the second fight will be another bloody war.

[theface07]

Rungvisai beat Chocolatito by the same margin that Ward beat Kovalev in the first fight, Murray beat Rosado, Bradley beat Pacquiao and Holmes beat Norton. In summation, Gonzalez deserved the nod.

[tokon]

Exactly!

I agree with you.

But Chocolatito is ******ly protected by the media and fans.

I don't know why but that's a reality.

All the people and media were crying like *****es, saying that was the robbery of the century.

Please... wtf with the people.

Good and competitive fight, the second fight will be another bloody war.

People watch the same fight and have different opinions.

For myself, I seen Rungvisai winning the first fight. I also thought that the head clashes came about primarily a sa result of the southaw-orthodox styles rather than as a deliberate tactic, andf both fighters contributed to them, just Gonzalez came off worst - and also did the most complaining. Not a good look.

Rungvisai looked the bigger, stronger, tougher fighter and Gonzalez was unable to overwelm him as he has done other fighters. I think Gonzalez looked frustrated that not only did Rungvisai not fold under pressure but fired back just as hard and, in fact, looked the heavier hitter.

I would bwe very surprised if the rematch proves any easier, for either fighter, but the Gonzales camp are doing their best to influence people that some how they were "robbed", or victims of bad refereeing, whatever.

[j0zef]

People is crazy.

Sir Rungvisai did a great fight too, yep, he is dirty but that's the fault of the lack of defense that Chocolatito has.

He doesn't know how to box with good defense, he is a pressure fighter but too frontal.

People need to look the fight vs Vargas 1 like 7 years ago, that fight was toe vs toe but Vargas is a C class fighter and was not too strong like the Thai.

The Thai guy deserved his win, period. The fight was competitive.

Look people.

The Thai gave Roman the rematch, immediately.

Roman is scared to fight again vs Estrada or Cuadras.

This is a bunch of garbage if I've ever read any.

Why do people spew such trash just to defend fighters from their country.

[Mexican_Puppet]

People watch the same fight and have different opinions.

For myself, I seen Rungvisai winning the first fight. I also thought that the head clashes came about primarily a sa result of the southaw-orthodox styles rather than as a deliberate tactic, andf both fighters contributed to them, just Gonzalez came off worst - and also did the most complaining. Not a good look.

Rungvisai looked the bigger, stronger, tougher fighter and Gonzalez was unable to overwelm him as he has done other fighters. I think Gonzalez looked frustrated that not only did Rungvisai not fold under pressure but fired back just as hard and, in fact, looked the heavier hitter.

I would bwe very surprised if the rematch proves any easier, for either fighter, but the Gonzales camp are doing their best to influence people that some how they were "robbed", or victims of bad refereeing, whatever.

Great post.

I agree with you, the team of Roman is saying a lot of sh.it since the end of the first fight.

The second fight will be the same, a bloody war.