Tweet
Yeah, buddy. Two guys can attest. Hernandez and Barrera are the best witnesses. Both met Pacquiao and Juarez. Both fell to Pacquiao. Barrera won over Jaurez, Hernandez went the distance in a losing effort to Pacquiao.
It is difficult to understand why some insist that Juarez has a bigger one-punch power. Twenty four rounds, and he never even staggered Barrera. Twelve rounds and he did not even make Hernandez pause.
Put together, 36 rounds and that one punch power went AWOL.
The last 3 guys Juarez disposed of before the final bell were: Baklin Medrano, Hurtado and Juan Carlos Ramirez. Outside of Hurtado, who has ever heard of the other two? And Hurtado had been stopped four out of five times before meeting Juarez! His vaunted power comes into play when he meets a Hurtado who had been stopped four times in five, Medrano who had been KO'd in all of his loses, and Ramirez who was KO'd in two by a faded Kevin Kelly. Not very durable, I dare say.
So OK, he stopped Guty Espadas in two. But, hey, are we forgetting that Espadas had been stopped by a Darryl Pinckney? And that Espadas had been KOd by Morales two fights prior in just three rounds?
Now let's take a look at Paquiao: the guy stopped Morales twice, and Morales has never been stopped before. In his last six fights only Larios went the distance (of course Morales, went that way too, in winning a 12 round decision in Pac-Morales I)
Why is it seen that Juarez packs a bigger punch when he disposes of unknowns and Pacquiao is seen as less of a puncher when he KOs a Morales who was never been stopped before and makes a Fahsan fly with one punch?
Why do some harp on on Pacquiao's multiple punches when he can make a Morales (who has never been floored by anyone else other than that dubious Barrera KD ) take a knee with one punch while backing up? Anyone who needs evidence of one punch power only needs to take a look at that. No body weight behind the punch and yet a MORALES falls. If one can get impressed with a one punch stoppage over an unknown, I cannot understand why one overlooks a ONE-PUNCH KD in the SECOND ROUND over a Morales EVEN AS THE PUNCHER WAS OFF BALANCE.
I just don't get it buddy.
It is difficult to understand why some insist that Juarez has a bigger one-punch power. Twenty four rounds, and he never even staggered Barrera. Twelve rounds and he did not even make Hernandez pause.
Put together, 36 rounds and that one punch power went AWOL.
The last 3 guys Juarez disposed of before the final bell were: Baklin Medrano, Hurtado and Juan Carlos Ramirez. Outside of Hurtado, who has ever heard of the other two? And Hurtado had been stopped four out of five times before meeting Juarez! His vaunted power comes into play when he meets a Hurtado who had been stopped four times in five, Medrano who had been KO'd in all of his loses, and Ramirez who was KO'd in two by a faded Kevin Kelly. Not very durable, I dare say.
So OK, he stopped Guty Espadas in two. But, hey, are we forgetting that Espadas had been stopped by a Darryl Pinckney? And that Espadas had been KOd by Morales two fights prior in just three rounds?
Now let's take a look at Paquiao: the guy stopped Morales twice, and Morales has never been stopped before. In his last six fights only Larios went the distance (of course Morales, went that way too, in winning a 12 round decision in Pac-Morales I)
Why is it seen that Juarez packs a bigger punch when he disposes of unknowns and Pacquiao is seen as less of a puncher when he KOs a Morales who was never been stopped before and makes a Fahsan fly with one punch?
Why do some harp on on Pacquiao's multiple punches when he can make a Morales (who has never been floored by anyone else other than that dubious Barrera KD ) take a knee with one punch while backing up? Anyone who needs evidence of one punch power only needs to take a look at that. No body weight behind the punch and yet a MORALES falls. If one can get impressed with a one punch stoppage over an unknown, I cannot understand why one overlooks a ONE-PUNCH KD in the SECOND ROUND over a Morales EVEN AS THE PUNCHER WAS OFF BALANCE.
I just don't get it buddy.
Comment