Would Thurman vs Crawford look a lot like Casamayor vs Corrales
Collapse
-
-
You forget that Thurman is great at countering when you counter him. Watch the Guerror, Porter, and Garcia fight Keith does this better than any boxer currently. If anything Crawford would be more intimated by Thurman's style. Thurman is faster, hots harder, bigger, and he has better defense. T beat Thurman you have to cut the ring off and batter him. That is no easy task. This is why I think Spence and Porter have the best chance to beat Thurman. But one thing is for sure, Porter showed us that it is suicide trying to go to war with Thurman. This is one of the reasons why I favor Thurman over Tito.I think Keith would be intimidated by Crawford's counter-punching ability and would fight cautiously. Couple this with the fact that Bud starts conservatively and ramps it up when he's established control, and you have a fight that's not going to live up to the hype.
Yea, I could be entirely wrong, but that's my prediction on this one.Comment
-
Comment
-
Guerrero, Porter, and Garcia don't have the movement Bud does. He doesn't hang around in the pocket unless he's hurting you. You can't expect Thurman to just be countering off counters. Bud is too accurate, fast, and his footwork too strong. Things those other 3 don't have.You forget that Thurman is great at countering when you counter him. Watch the Guerror, Porter, and Garcia fight Keith does this better than any boxer currently. If anything Crawford would be more intimated by Thurman's style. Thurman is faster, hots harder, bigger, and he has better defense. T beat Thurman you have to cut the ring off and batter him. That is no easy task. This is why I think Spence and Porter have the best chance to beat Thurman. But one thing is for sure, Porter showed us that it is suicide trying to go to war with Thurman. This is one of the reasons why I favor Thurman over Tito.
Crawford would beat Thurman w/o cutting off the ring or pursuing him. He'd have no need to. He's faster and has better movement. He'd make him reach, counter off the jab, and move, just like he did Postol, and leave Keith frustrated all night. I think Thurman is a very talented guy, but Crawford is exactly the type to beat him.Comment
-
No, Crawford is not faster nor does he have better movement than Thurman. Thurman has the best movement compared to all the other Welters(Porter is no slouch though)Plus comparing Crawford vs Postol to potential Crawford vs Thurman isn't a good comparisons. Thurman is head shoulder's above Postol who was an overrated hype job who doesn't scratch the floor with Thurman's boxing ability. Postol was scared to engage with Crawford, Thurman wouldn't be due to the fact that he would know that he is the bigger, faster, and stronger man. Thurman would dash in and out and he will dish it out a lot harder than Crawford would. I am of the mindset that in order to dominate at higher weight classes you need to have great defense like Pernell, Floyd, Wilfred, and Bradley. Hell, even Pac did a good job at bobbing, blocking shots, and countering his opponents while slipping. Crawford gets hit too much and he hasn't beaten the quality of opponents that Thurman has. Before I'm sold on the whole idea of Crawford dominating at 147 I have to see how he handles, Horn, Porter, Vargas, and Garcia.Guerrero, Porter, and Garcia don't have the movement Bud does. He doesn't hang around in the pocket unless he's hurting you. You can't expect Thurman to just be countering off counters. Bud is too accurate, fast, and his footwork too strong. Things those other 3 don't have.
Crawford would beat Thurman w/o cutting off the ring or pursuing him. He'd have no need to. He's faster and has better movement. He'd make him reach, counter off the jab, and move, just like he did Postol, and leave Keith frustrated all night. I think Thurman is a very talented guy, but Crawford is exactly the type to beat him.Comment
Comment