Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn Wants Joshua vs. Parker Unification By Mid-2018

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pigeons
    replied
    Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
    Should have thought of that before he had them.

    What qualifications did he get at school, he needs to find a job.
    I'll pay Wilder $15K to fly to the UK to knock you DA FAWK OUT!

    Leave a comment:


  • vitali1999
    replied
    I think Hearn is mishandling Joshua's career but why is Joshua letting him. So they are both at fault, Joshua should be fighting 3 times a year not 2. Most belts don't rank the same guys number 1 as the others do so more mandatories. He's right about not mentioning wilder, wilder hasn't even fought his Mando and he's had his belt for 2 and a half years. But everyother fighter does have to fight his mandatory once a Year

    Leave a comment:


  • 1hourRun
    replied
    Reading some of these comments is disgusting! If Al Haymon been doing this I'm sure you same f*gs here defending Hearn would be doing the opposite.

    Leave a comment:


  • KillaCamNZ
    replied
    Originally posted by JRB123 View Post
    It amazes me that some people don't realize this...If Joshua had said yes to fighting Wilder, I'd bet that one of those major titles he has would be stripped before the fight would happen, and it would not be far fetched to say that both of them would.

    Let Joshua handle his business in the UK. If Wilder wants to gain popularity, go after Whyte before the end of this year and then see if Parker is available if this fight falls through. Besides, there are a few other fights that he could have while AJ goes against his mandatories.
    Absolutely. It's a non-negotiable thing, AJ has to take care of his prior arrangements before Wilder, or end up stripped of at least the IBF title, and in court with Klitchko. It's black and white, and it's incredible that there are people who can't grasp it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Earl-Hickey
    replied
    Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
    So what did I miss? Where's Deontay Wilder in this scenario? I told y'all Hearn was hiding and protecting AJ from Wilder. So what exactly is he afraid of? Parker was the unification bout that Deontay had always wanted but now he's snatching that one right from under his feet also.
    Deontay is exactly where he should be

    Nowhere

    Leave a comment:


  • NahMean
    replied
    Parker fighting in the UK making his presence bigger here to get AJ fight.. Something Wilder refuses to do despite being offered career high payday.

    Leave a comment:


  • JRB123
    replied
    Originally posted by KillaCamNZ View Post
    If Wilder wants to be stubborn and turn that down, fine. But he needs to stop pretending Wilder-Joshua can be made tomorrow - it can't, it won't, so he needs to stop talking nonsense.
    It amazes me that some people don't realize this...If Joshua had said yes to fighting Wilder, I'd bet that one of those major titles he has would be stripped before the fight would happen, and it would not be far fetched to say that both of them would.

    Let Joshua handle his business in the UK. If Wilder wants to gain popularity, go after Whyte before the end of this year and then see if Parker is available if this fight falls through. Besides, there are a few other fights that he could have while AJ goes against his mandatories.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cobra_
    replied
    Yeah Parker isn't beating Fury. Sorry Hearn!

    Leave a comment:


  • champion4ever
    replied
    Originally posted by bluebeam View Post
    In what world is Parker vs Joshua a better fight than wilder vs Joshua?

    two undefeated punchers with suspect chins have an opportunity to unify in a 50/50 fight and all i I see is dudes saying why it shouldn't happen.

    you dudes really showed the pulse of the fanboy in this thread.

    mention Parker and fury for Joshua and fanboys go crazy with joy.

    mention wilder and Ortiz for Joshua and fanboys become financial advisers.

    wilder vs Joshua is the fight to bring back heavyweights. not Joshua vs parker
    Finally, common sense prevails. This kid gets it!

    Leave a comment:


  • bluebeam
    replied
    In what world is Parker vs Joshua a better fight than wilder vs Joshua?

    two undefeated punchers with suspect chins have an opportunity to unify in a 50/50 fight and all i I see is dudes saying why it shouldn't happen.

    you dudes really showed the pulse of the fanboy in this thread.

    mention Parker and fury for Joshua and fanboys go crazy with joy.

    mention wilder and Ortiz for Joshua and fanboys become financial advisers.

    wilder vs Joshua is the fight to bring back heavyweights. not Joshua vs parker

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP