Comments Thread For: Sanchez: Golovkin Declining? Big Surprise in Canelo Fight!

[Shadoww702]

It isn't for nothing you're known as the shook one lol. This is actually the only account i'm on and have never been on any other... don't see why i would.

Just stick to ice skating Cinderella nobody's buying you as the toughguy and you'll just get exposed as usual.

So you just started all your sht talking a year ago??? I'm not trying be a internet tough guy...Plenty of other ppl got that title. I talk, eat, and sleep boxing. I also game a lot so when I'm wrong I litterly
Pay for it. I don't get free passes to say whatever I want

[Little Mac 91]

So you just started all your sht talking a year ago??? I'm not trying be a internet tough guy...Plenty of other ppl got that title. I talk, eat, and sleep boxing. I also game a lot so when I'm wrong I litterly
Pay for it. I don't get free passes to say whatever I want

Haven't done any shyt talking that's what you yourself did and now you're trying to save face.

Good for you that you gamble a lot. Ofcourse the odds are calculated so that on every win you're getting underpaid in relation to your bet and in the long round you're most likely to be on minus but i'm sure you knew all of that already.

[Shadoww702]

Haven't done any shyt talking that's what you yourself did and now you're trying to save face.

Good for you that you gamble a lot. Ofcourse the odds are calculated so that on every win you're getting underpaid in relation to your bet and in the long round you're most likely to be on minus but i'm sure you knew all of that already.

Yup! I didn't realize I was sht talking??? I thought we were talking boxing??? I'll have to go back and look at some of my comments. I usually never get personal?? You must of said something whacked???

[Mr. 29K]

I'm coming for you, Abel. You better have extra security, race traitor.

[turnedup]

that old "aint never gonna happen", i heard that several times already, and canelo has fought them all.. cant say the same for ggg, in fact if we go by abel sanchez, canelo-jacobs is more probable than ggg-jacobs 2...

Fought them all? LOL ok let's rewrite history. Why didn't he fight the best people at 154 in recent years? It's either they are too good or ole reliable "they are haymon fighters." As I said i'll take bets it never happens just like he ain't ever going to fight either of the Charlo brothers.

[satiev1]

Post fight comments by the canelo turds. " Canelo was never a true 160 lber." GGG has yet to fight a name. When will he move up to 168 lbs. Canelo win dosen't do much for his legacy. I can see it already.

[aboutfkntime]

Fought them all? LOL ok let's rewrite history. Why didn't he fight the best people at 154 in recent years? It's either they are too good or ole reliable "they are haymon fighters." As I said i'll take bets it never happens just like he ain't ever going to fight either of the Charlo brothers.

funny that you had to add that little caveat

the answer is..... because he became a superstar when he fought the FOUR best JMW's on the planet CONSECUTIVELY..... and the next crop had - not only never established themselves as front-runners for that payday - they had not even established a genuine contender for Canelo's belt

there were interesting fights, sure..... but nobody put their hand up and earned that fight..... e,g, nobody was in the position that Lara was in, when some observers were saying that he could beat Canelo..... they would not even fight each other

that situation was like Mayweather at 147..... everybody stood off each other, hoping to land that fight/payday by accident, or because others fell over trying

nobody at 154 staked a decent claim for that fight..... Charlo actually got there - or close - imo, with those wins over Trout/Williams, but then he moved to 160

it is ridiculous that you had to conveniently overlook the fact that Canelo fought the FOUR best JMW's CONSECUTIVELY in order to find something to whine about

and YES, the five best JMW's were definitely Canelo, Trout, Mayweather, Angulo, Lara (not in order)..... so, don't try that one on

and, Lara > the Charlo's..... until they prove otherwise

[aboutfkntime]

if Charlo becomes a worthwhile opponent at 160, and I can see it..... then he will obviously land a Canelo fight IF Canelo beats Golovkin and keeps winning

Charlo would likely need to get past Jacobs in order to land that fight, or something similar...... and Canelo would need to beat Golovkin, and keep winning

that fight has down-the-road written all over it

so..... Canelo is about to fight Golovkin, but he would never dare fight Charlo?

really ?


you guys pull boogiemen out of your ass

[turnedup]

funny that you had to add that little caveat

the answer is..... because he became a superstar when he fought the FOUR best JMW's on the planet CONSECUTIVELY..... and the next crop had - not only never established themselves as front-runners for that payday - they had not even established a genuine contender for Canelo's belt

there were interesting fights, sure..... but nobody put their hand up and earned that fight..... e,g, nobody was in the position that Lara was in, when some observers were saying that he could beat Canelo..... they would not even fight each other

that situation was like Mayweather at 147..... everybody stood off each other, hoping to land that fight/payday by accident, or because others fell over trying

nobody at 154 staked a decent claim for that fight..... Charlo actually got there - or close - imo, with those wins over Trout/Williams, but then he moved to 160

it is ridiculous that you had to conveniently overlook the fact that Canelo fought the FOUR best JMW's CONSECUTIVELY in order to find something to whine about

and YES, the five best JMW's were definitely Canelo, Trout, Mayweather, Angulo, Lara (not in order)..... so, don't try that one on

and, Lara > the Charlo's..... until they prove otherwise

He fought Trout who arguably had one noteworthy fight on his resume at the time, he fought Lara who I have credited him with, he showed up to collect a check vs Floyd (he was the Chavez Jr of that fight), he fought a 39 year old Mosley and a 35/36 year old Cotto.

Lara - Lara wasn't going to win that fight fairly but took him 12
Trout - One notable win and hasn't done shhh since but took him 12
Cotto - Too small and way too old and still took him twelve
Mosley - Too old, too slow, too punch drunk, and still took him 12
Floyd - Lost every single second of that fight, literally every second of the fight...hell Berto did better than Canelo vs Floyd.

So again what exactly has Canelo done? Who has Canelo beaten fairly that's actually an elite fighter and not washed up? NOBODY. I guess we should overlook the blown up WW's he's also fought. For all this he's fought the best, in what now 51 fights..51!!!! He's got one win over an elite fighter in their prime and it was a controversial win..1!

[Little Mac 91]

Yup! I didn't realize I was sht talking??? I thought we were talking boxing??? I'll have to go back and look at some of my comments. I usually never get personal?? You must of said something whacked???

I asked about your ******** and you started talking shyt and attacking me. But maybe you saw it as sarcasm that happens too.